Skip to main content

Adaptive Dynamics, Resource Conversion Efficiency, and Species Diversity

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Dynamic Game Theory

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 9))

Abstract

Previous work on the theory of continuous evolutionary games and adaptive dynamics has shown that a species can evolve to an evolutionarily stable minimum on a frequency-dependent adaptive landscape (e.g., Brown and Pavlovic [7], andAbrams etal. [3], [4]). While such stable minima are convergent stable, they can be invaded by rare alternative strategies. The significance of such stable minima for biology is that they produce “disruptive selection” which can potentially lead to speciation (Metz et al. [20], Geritz et al. [16], Cohen et al. [11], and Mitchell [21]. Previous analyses of Lotka-Volterra competition communities indicate that stable minima and speciation events are more likely to occur when the underlying resource distribution is broader than the resource utilization functions of the competing species. Here, I present an analysis based on a resource-consumer model which allows individuals to adaptively vary resource use as a function of competitor density and strategy. I show that habitat specialization, stable minima, community invasibility, and sympatric speciation are more likely when individuals are more efficient at converting resources into viable offspring. Conversely, factors that inhibit conversion efficiency inhibit speciation and promote competitive exclusion. This model suggests possible links between species diversity and factors influencing the resource conversion efficiency, such as climate, habitat fragmentation, and environmental toxins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P.A. 1991. Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology. 72:1242–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams, P.A. 2003. Can adaptive evolution or behavior lead to diversification of traits determingin a trade-off between foraging gain and predation risk? Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams, P.A., Y. Harada, and H. Matsuda. 1993. On the relationships between quantitative genetics and ESS models. Evolution. 47:982–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrams, P.A., H. Matsuda, and Y. Harada. 1993. Evolutionary unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7:465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, J.S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 22:37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J.S. 1989. Desert rodent community structure: a test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecological Monographs 59:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J.S. and N.B. Pavlovic. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous envioronments: Effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol. 6:360–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, J.S. and T.L. Vincent. 1992. Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution. 46:1269–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charhov, E.L. 1976. Optimal Foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biol. 9: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christiansen, F.B. 1991. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Amer. Nat. 138:37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, Y., T.L. Vincent, and J.S. Brown. 1999. A G-function approach to fitness minima, fitness maxima, evolutionarily stable strategies and adaptive landscapes. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:923–942.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diekmann, U. and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doebeli, M. and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Amer. Nat. 156:S77–S101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eschel, I. 1983. Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol. 103:99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geritz, S.A.H., E. Kisdi, G. Meszena, and J.A.J. Metz. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geritz, S.A.H., J.A.J. Metz, E. Kisdi, and G Meszena. 1997. The dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary branching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:2024–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, Lin, and P.J. Morin. 2004. Temperature-dependent interactions explain unexpected responses to environmental warming in communities of competitors. J. Anim. Ecol. 73:560–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kisdi, E. 1999. Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. J. Theor. Biol. 197:149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maynard Smith, J., and G.R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Metz, J.A.J., S.A.H. Geritz, G Meszena, F.J.A. Jacobs, and J.S. van Heerwaarden. 1996. pp. 183–231 in S.J. van Strien and S.M. Verduyn Lunel, eds. Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell, W.A. 2000. Limits to species richness in a continuum of habitat heterogeneity: an ESS approach. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell, W.A., Z. Abramsky, B.P. Kotler, B. Pinshow, and J.S. Brown. 1990. The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents: theory and experiments. Ecology 71:844–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell, W.A. and W.P. Porter. 2001. Foraging games and species diversity. Annales Zoologici Fennici 38:89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stephens, D.W. and J.R. Krebs. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Turchin, P. 2003. Complex Population Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vincent, T.L., Y. Cohen, and J.S. Brown. 1993. Evolution via strategy dynamics. Theor. Pop. Biol. 44:149–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, W.A. (2007). Adaptive Dynamics, Resource Conversion Efficiency, and Species Diversity. In: Jørgensen, S., Quincampoix, M., Vincent, T.L. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Game Theory. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 9. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4553-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics