Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology ((ETEP,volume 1))

Abstract

Defining the source of pollution is sometimes a contentious affair. Pollution from human sources is readily characterized by the presence of the synthetic estrogen, ethinylestradiol. Steroid and sterol profiles are characteristic of different CAFOs, e.g. 17α estradiol is typical of cattle, a high ratio of androstenedione/testosterone is characteristic of aquaculture. This can be combined with the new methods of bacterial phenotyping for source determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed W, Stewart J, Powell D, Gardner T (2008) Evaluation of Bacteroides markers for the detection of human faecal pollution. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:237–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barel-Cohen K, Shore LS, Shemesh M, Wenzel A, Mueller J, Kronfeld-Schor N (2006) Monitoring of natural and synthetic hormones in a polluted river. J Environ Manage 78:16–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Call DR, Satterwhite DM, Soule M (2007) Using DNA suspension arrays to identify library independent markers for bacterial source tracking. Water Res 41:3740–3746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cimenti M, Hubberstey A, Bewtra JK, Biswas N (2007) Alternative methods in tracking sources of microbial contamination in waters. Water SA 33:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Field KG, Samadpour M (2007) Fecal source tracking, the indicator paradigm, and managing water quality. Water Res 41:3517–3538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn C, Crozier JB, Mentz KA, Booth AM, Graves AK, Nelson NJ, Reneau Jr RB (2003) Carbon source utilization profiles as a method to identify sources of faecal pollution in water. J Appl Microbiol 94:792–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins RL, Wilson EM, Angus RA, Howell WM, Kirk M (2003) Androstenedione and progesterone in the sediment of a river receiving paper mill effluent. Toxicol Sci 73:53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leeming R, Ball A, Ashbolt N, Nichols P (1996) Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters. Water Res 30:2893–2900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Domingo JS, Shanks OC (2007) Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach. Water Res 41:3561–3574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santo Domingo JW, Bambic DG, Edge TA, Wuertz S (2007) Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution. Water Res 41:3539–3552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schill WB, Mathes MV (2008) Real-Time PCR detection and quantification of nine potential sources of fecal contamination by analysis of mitochondrial Cytochrome b targets. Environ Sci Technol 42:5229–5234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standley LJ, Kaplan LA, Smith D (2000) Molecular tracers of organic matter sources to surface water resources. Environ Sci Technol 34:3124–3130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker AR, Wilhartitz I, Farnleitner AH, Mach RL (2008) Development of a Scorpion probe-based real-time PCR for the sensitive quantification of Bacteroides sp. ribosomal DNA from human and cattle origin and evaluation in spring water matrices. Microbiol Res 163:140–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundram A, Jumanlal N, Ehlers MM (2006) Studies to distinguish between human and animal faecal pollution using F-RNA coliphages and faecal sterols. Water SA 32:627–632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins BA (1996) Discriminant analysis of antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal Streptococci, a method to differentiate human and animal sources of fecal pollution in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 621:3997–4002

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U, Plaut I, Hushan M (2004) The case of the nonionic alkylphenol ethoxylates in the Mediterranean Sea region: is there a problem? Water Sci Technol 50:79–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Shore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shore, L. (2009). Tracking Sources of CAFO Pollution. In: Pruden, A., Shore, . (eds) Hormones and Pharmaceuticals Generated by Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92834-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics