Skip to main content

From Employee Governance to Corporate Governance: Transnational Forces and the Polish Corporate Governance Debates Since the 1980s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

This chapter discusses the corporate governance debate in postsocialist Poland in the light of processes of transnationalization. With the collapse of state socialism at the end of the 1980s, the countries in Central Europe faced a wide variety of ‘transition models’ from which they could choose. As Marangos (2004) points out, the former state socialist countries were to choose from a broad array of economic arrangements ranging from the introduction of a neoliberal market economy to a pluralistic socialist model, to mention but two totally different systems. This chapter aims to broaden our insights of why countries choose their distinct path. More concretely, it focuses on corporate governance debates, that is policy discussions on the distribution of ownership and control. Such debates have been of vital importance in the context of Central Europe, where the collapse of state socialism and its replacement with a decentralized market economy fundamentally altered the role of the firm within the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     The only alteration from the original quote is based on the reference Bayart to colonial past Africa, which I have replaced by the word ‘transnational’.

  2. 2.

     Please note that the notion of external ownership still allows for substantial variation in actual ownership structures, ranging from highly dispersed ownership to large block holders (see for instance Andreff 2007). The main element of outside ownership rests on the separation between ownership on the one hand and management and employees on the other.

  3. 3.

     With regard to the first group, Marc Weinstein (2000) mentions the names of Lewandowski, Szomburg, Bielecki and Merkel. With regard to the second group we can think of people such as Balcerowicz (see also Balcerowicz 1995).

  4. 4.

     Interview with Balcerowicz, retrieved from Commanding Heights. The battle for the World economy. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/int_leszekbalcerowicz.html (20-1-2003).

  5. 5.

     The historic overview of AmCham Poland’s activities can be found under http://www.amcham.pl/index.php?mod=page&page=1_history&PHPSESSID=b7ba6d3edba877e5e308114254d232f1.

  6. 6.

     The acquis refers to the EU regulation that needed to be implemented prior to EU membership.

  7. 7.

     For an overview of Polish corporate governance scandals, see Dzierżanowski and Tamowicz 2003, Kobrak and Obloj 2002 and Tamowicz 2006.

  8. 8.

     See Best Practices in Public Companies in 2002, retrieved from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/practices_2002.pdf, 24 April 2008.

  9. 9.

     Whereas the term ‘shareholder’ is mentioned 26 times.

  10. 10.

     Interviews with Raimondo Eggink, former Chief Executive Officer, ABN AMRO Asset Management Poland, June 2006 Warsaw, and with Mike Lubrano, International Finance Corporation, July 2007.

  11. 11.

     Interview with Tomasz Prusek, correspondent on corporate governance for the Gazeta Wyborcza, June 2006.

References

  • Aguilera, R. (2005). ‘Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: An Institutional Comparative Perspective’, British Journal of Management, 16(S1): S39–S53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R.V. and Jackson, G. (2003). ‘The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants’, Academy of Management Review, 28: 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1991). Capitalism against Capitalism. London, Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allio, L. (1997). ‘Institutional Structures, Labor Interests, and Evolving Privatization Bargains in Poland’, in: D.L Weimer (ed.) The Political Economy of Property Rights. Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreff, W. (2007). ‘Corporate Governance Structures in Postsocialist Economies: Towards a Central Eastern European Model of Corporate Control?’, in: B. Van Apeldoorn, A. Nölke, H.W. Overbeek (eds.) The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation. London, Routledge, pp. 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation. Budapest, Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, J.F. (1993). The State in Africa. The Politics of the Belly. Harlow, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggelli, M. and Ghini, G. (2005). Eastward Enlargement and Privatisation in EECs: A Survey. University of Bologna – Department of Management and University of Bologna – Department of Management, Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockman, J. and Eyal, G. (2002). ‘Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 108(2): 310–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, J.M. (2001). Silent Revolution the International Monetary Fund 1979–1989. Washington, DC, IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1996). ‘A Theory of Privatisation’, The Economic Journal, 106(435): 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, L. (2002). ‘Making Markets and Eastern Enlargement: Diverging Convergence?’, West European Politics, 25(2), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. and Zaman, M. (2005). ‘Convergence in European Corporate Governance: the audit committee concept’, Corporate Governance: An international Review, 13(6), 753–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1983). ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1987). Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.W. (1992). ‘Global Perestroika’, in: R. Miliband, L. Panitch (eds.) The Socialist Register. London, Merlin Press, pp. 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahokoupil, J. (2008). Globalization and the state in Central ean Eastern Europe: The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzierżanowski, M. and Tamowicz, P. (2003). ‘Setting Standards of Corporate Governance: The Polish Experience of Drafting Governance Codes’, European Business Organization Law Review, 4: 273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002). Regular Report from the Commission on Poland’s Progress Towards Accession. Brussels, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Nuti, D.M., and Uvalic, M. (2000). ‘The Impact of Investment Funds on Corporate Governance in Mass Privatization Schemes: Czech Republic Poland and Slovania’ MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transactional Economics, 1: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleye, O., Mehrotra, V., and Morck, R. (2006). ‘When Labor has a Voice in Corporate Governance’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41: 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, T. (2002). The Polish Revolution: Solidarity, Third Revised Version. London, Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L., and Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, M. (1994). ‘The Great Deformation: Polanyi, Poland and the Terrors of Planned Spontaneity’, New Left Review, 204, 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2003). ‘European Integration and Corporate Governance in Central Europe: Trajectories of Institutional Change’, in: M. Federocwicz, R.V. Aguilera (eds.) Corporate Governance in a Changing Economic and Political Environment. Trajectories of Institutional Change. Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp. 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, E., King, L., and János, I.T. (2002). ‘The State, International Agencies, and Property Transformation in Postcommunist Hungary’, American Journal of Sociology, 108(1): 129–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdan, A. and Krasodomska, J. (2005). ‘The Implementation of Corporate Governance Code by Polish Companies’, Paper presented at the British Accounting Association. Annual Conference, Edinburgh, 30 March to 1 April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D. (2005). Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reform for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrak, C. and Obloj, K. (2002). ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Poland’s Search for a Workable Model’, Paper presented at the European International Business Academy, Athens, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanowicz, J., Kozarzewski, P., and Woodward R. (2005). Understanding Reform: The Case of Poland. CASE Reports 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, T. (1994). ‘A Reply to Maurice Glasman’ New Left Review, July/August: 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozarzewski, P. (2003). Corporate Governance and Secondary Privatization in Poland: Legal Framework and Changes in Ownership Structure. CASE Studies and Analyses, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozarzewski, P. (2007). Corporate Governance Formation in Poland, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Ukraine. Centre for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Studies and Analyses No. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, J. (1997). ‘The Political Context of Mass Privatization in Poland’, in: I.W. Lieberman, S.S. Nestor, R.M. Desai (eds.) Between State and Market. World Bank Studies of Economies in Transition, pp. 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. (2000). ‘Developments in Corporate Governance in Central and Eastern Europe’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(1): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangos, J. (2004). Models of Economic Transition. London, Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, A. (2000). Enlargement of the European Union: An Analysis of the Negotiations with the Central and Eastern European Candidate Countries. European Institute, Sussex, Working Paper no. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, C.S. (1995). ‘Foreign Experts, Capitalists, and Competing Agendas. Privatization in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary’, Comparative Political Studies, 28: 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. (2000). ‘International Production Networks and Enterprise Transformation in Central Europe’, Comparative Economic Studies, 42: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oplustil, K. (2000). Gläubigerschutz durch reale Kapitalaufbringung im deutschen und polnischen Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Frankfurt am Main, Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, M. (2001). Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. (2004). Global Governance, Class, Hegemony: A Historical Materialist Perspective. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Working Papers Political Science (01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L. (1996). ‘Rethinking the Role of the State’, in: J. Mittelman (ed.) Globalization: Critical Reflections. Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner, pp. 83–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainnie, A. and Hardy, J. (1995). ‘Desperately seeking capitalism: Solidarity and Polish industrial relations’, Industrial Relations Journal, 26(4): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. (2003). ‘The Charge of the Right Brigade: Transnational Social Forces and the Neoliberal Configuration of Poland’s Transition’, Political Economy, 8(2): 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. (2004). ‘Global Restructuring and the Polish State: Transition, Transformation, or Transnationalisation?’, Review of International Political Economy, 11(1): 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. (2006). ‘Historicizing Transition: The Polish Political Economy in a Period of Global Structural Change – Eastern Central Europe’s Passive Revolution?’, International Politics, 43(4): 474–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. and Weichenrieder, A.J. (1997). ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Political Resentment and the Privatization Process in Eastern Europe’, Economic Policy, 12(4): 178–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.C. (1994). ‘On the Law and Economics of Employee Ownership in Privaitszation in Developing and Transition Economies’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 65(3): 437–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg, S. (2003). ‘The Promotion of “Anglo-American” Corporate Governance in the South: Who benefits from this new international standard?’, Third World Quarterly. 24(1), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soederberg, S. (2005). ‘The Transnational Debt Architecture and Emerging Markets: Politics of Paradoxes and Punishment’, Third World Quarterly, 26(6): 927–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. (1992). ‘Path Dependence and Privatization. Strategies in East Central Europe’, Eastern European Politics and Societies, 6(1), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2002). ‘Introduction: Global Knowledge and Advocacy Networks’, Global Networks, 2(1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamowicz, P. (2006). ‘Corporate Governance in Poland’, in: C. Mallin (ed.) Handbook on International Corporate Governance, Country Analyses. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. and Smith, C. (1992). ‘Socialism and the Labour Process in Theory and Practice’, in: P. Thompson, C. Smith (eds.) Labour in Transition. The Labour Process in Eastern Europe. London, Routledge, pp. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, S. (2006). ‘The Hidden Meaning of Codes: Corporate Governance and Investor Rent Seeking’, European Business Organization Law Review, 7: 845–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uminski, S. (2001). ‘Foreign Capital in the Privatization Process in Poland’, Transnational Corporations, 10(3): 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Apeldoorn, B., Nölke, A., and Overbeek, H.W. (2007). ‘The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation: Introducing Key Concepts, Questions and Approaches’, in: B. Van Apeldoorn, A. Nölke, H.W. Overbeek, (eds.) The Political Economy of Corporate Governance Regulation. London, Routledge, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, A. (2008a). ‘EU membership and the rise of a foreign-led type of capitalism in the Czech Republic’ In: J. Pickles & R.M. Jenkins (eds.), State and society in post-socialist economies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, A. (2008b). The Transnational Political Economy of Corporate Governance Codes- the Case of the Polish Corporate Governance Code. Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, A. and Horn, L. (2007). ‘The Role of the EU in the (Trans)formation of Corporate Governance Regulation in Central Eastern Europe- The Case of the Czech Republic’, Competition and Change, 11(2): 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, A. and Overbeek, H.W. (2007). ‘Corporate Governance Regulation in East Central Europe: The Role of Transnational Forces’, in: B. Van Apeldoorn, A. Nölke, H.W. Overbeek (eds.) The Political Economy of Corporate Governance Regulation. London, Routledge, pp. 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, J.R. (2003). ‘Clans, Cliques and Captured States: Rethinking “Transition” in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union’, Journal of International Development, 15(4): 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (2000). ‘Solidarity’s Abandonment of Worker Councils: Redefining Employee Stakeholder rights in Post-socialist Poland’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(1): 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, D.M. (2004). ‘Property Rights in Context: Privatization’s Legacy for Corporate Legality in Poland and Russia’, Studies in Comparative International Development, Winter 38(4): 82–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. (1996). ‘Management-Employee Buy Outs in Poland’, in: D. Boda, J. Karsai, L. Neumann, R. Woodward (eds.) Management-Employee Buy Outs in Hungary and Poland. Warsaw, Case, pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1987). Poland: Reform, Adjustment, and Growth. Washington, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes. Corporate Governance Country Assessment Poland. Retrieved at: http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/rosc_cg_pol_05.pdf (26-10-2006).

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Henk Overbeek, Andreas Nölke, László Bruszt and Jasper de Raadt for their extremely insightful feedback and useful suggestions on earlier versions of this study. Research support by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) is gratefully acknowledged. The usual caveats apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjan Vliegenthart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vliegenthart, A. (2009). From Employee Governance to Corporate Governance: Transnational Forces and the Polish Corporate Governance Debates Since the 1980s. In: Bruszt, L., Holzhacker, R. (eds) The Transnationalization of Economies, States, and Civil Societies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89339-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics