Skip to main content

Methods in the Analysis of Maasai Livelihoods

  • Chapter
Staying Maasai?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 Livestock densities are expressed in Livestock equivalents (LE) or Tropical livestock units (TLU) per unit area. Exact definitions vary. In the context of these studies, one LE or TLU = 250 kg weight. Adult Maasai cow = 0.71; adult sheep/goat = 0.17 TLU or LE. See, for example,. ILCA (1981) and Sellen (2003).

  2. 2.

    2 In the case of this book, abridged versions were produced and the families revisited in 2007 to seek their consent for these versions to be published as they appear in the book.

  3. 3.

    3 In Amboseli and Longido, cropping was differentiated as lowland or highland, whereas in the other sites only one cropping variable was defined.

  4. 4.

    4 Adult equivalents are a system for expressing a group of people in terms of standard reference adult units, with respect to food or metabolic requirements. A reference adult is taken as an adult male: other categories are a fraction of that adult equivalent: Adult male = 1AE; adult female = 0.9AE; M/F 10–14 years = 0.9AE; M/F/5–9 years = 0.6AE; infant/child 2–4 years = 0.52AE (Homewood and Rogers, 1991; Sellen, 2003).

  5. 5.

    5 In Mara and Longido, this analysis was limited to examining factors influencing gross annual income according to available data.

  6. 6.

    6When a variogram is extrapolated back to zero distance, it may not approach zero variance. The amount by which the variance differs from zero (the constant) is known as the nugget effect. This term derives from mining geostatistics where nuggets literally exist. A pure nugget effect corresponds to the total absence of auto-correlation.

References

  • Anderson, D., 2002, Eroding the Commons: The Politics of Ecology in Baringo, Kenya 1890–1968 Oxford, UK: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., and Broch-Due, V., 1999, The Poor Are Not Us. Oxford, UK: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltenweck, I., Staal, S.J., Ibrahim, M., Manyong, V. , Williams, T., Jabbar, M., Holmann, F., Patil, B., Herrero, M., Thornton, P., and de Wolff, T., 2003, SLP Project on Transregional Analysis of Crop-Livestock Systems. Level 1 Report: Broad dimensions of crop-livestock intensification and interaction across three continents. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, R., BurnSilver, S., and Thornton, P. , 2006, Optimizing aspects of land use intensification in Southern Kajiado District, Kenya. Final Report to the International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. Reto-o-Reto Project, DGIC, December 2006. Available at: www.reto-o-reto.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., 2001, Women's income and livelihood strategies of dispossessed pastoralists. The case of Mkomazi Game Reserve . Human Ecology 29, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BurnSilver, S., 2007, Pathways of Continuity and Change: Diversification, Intensification and Mobility in Maasailand Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Colorado State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov, A.V., 1966, The Theory of Peasant Economy, Edited by D. Thorner, B. Kerblay, and R.E.F. Smith. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin (American Economic Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coast, E., 2002, Maasai socio-economic conditions: cross-border comparison. Human Ecology 30(1), 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, K., Nkedianye, D., Partoip, E., Sumare, S., Kiruswa, S., Kaelo, D., Onetu, L., Nesele, M., Said, M., Homewood, K., Trench, P., Reid, R.S., and Herrero, M., 2005, Family fortunes: Analysis of changing livelihoods in Maasailand. Final Project Report ZC0275. Livestock Production Programme. UK: Department for International Development. 213 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, B., 1986, Land tenure, subdivision and residential change on a Maasai group ranch. Bulletin of the Institute for Development Anthropology 4(2), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, B., 1988, Wealth Ranking in Smallholder Communities: A Field Manual. Nottingham, UK: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Nkedianye, D., BurnSilver, S., Kamuaro, O., Reid, R., and Thornton, P.K., 2003, Identifying the information needs of decision-makers supporting Maasai pastoralists in Kenya. ILRI, University of Edinburgh and the Maasai pastoralist communities of Kajiado and Narok. Final Technical Report, Project ZC0196 — DfID Livestock Production Research Programme. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute. 57 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homewood, K., 1992, Development and the ecology of Maasai food and nutrition. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 29, 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homewood, K., and Rogers, W., 1991, Maasailand Ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Homewood, K., Lambin, E.F., Coast, E., Kariuki, A., Kikula, I., Kivelia, J., Said, M., Serneels, S., and Thompson, M., 2001, Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: Pastoralism, population or policies? Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences 98(22), 12544–12549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homewood, K., Trench, P., Randall, S., Lynen, G., and Bishop, E., 2006, Livestock health and socio-economic impacts of veterinary intervention in Maasailand . Agricultural Systems 89, 248–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IIED, 1995, Critical Reflections from Practice. PLA Notes Vol. 24. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIED, 2005, Family Portraits. Tool write-up by K.Cochrane, with inputs from S.Vermeulen, E. Morrison, and C. Hesse of IIED. The family portrait tool was originally developed by B. Thébaud. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILCA, 1981, Introduction to the East African Range and Livestock Study. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Centre for Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliffe, J., 1987, The African Poor: A History. New York: Cambridge University Press. African Studies Series.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiwasila, H., and Homewood, K., 1999, Appendix 1: PRA background. In: Mkomazi: The Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation of a Tanzanian Savanna, Edited by M.J. Coe, N.C. McWilliam, G.N. Stone, and M. Packer. London: Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers). pp. 550–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Nkedianye, D., Kruska, R., Reid, R., Gichohi, H., Atieno, F., and Sandford, R., 2002, Valuing alternative land use options in the Kitengela wildlife dispersal area of Kenya. ILRI Impact Assessment Series 10. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI. 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, P., McPeak, J., Barrett C., and Kristjanson, P., 2008, Challenging stereotypes: The complexity of poverty in pastoral areas of East Africa. Development and Change 39(4), 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A., 2002, Unexpected migrations: Urban labour migration of rural youth and Maasai pastoralists. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, F., 2007, Emergent or illusory? Community wildlife management in Tanzania. Drylands Issue Paper No. 146. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D., and Gwynne, M. (eds), 1977, Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellen, D., 2003, Nutritional consequences of wealth differentials in East African pastoralists: The case of the Datoga of Northern Tanzania. Human Ecology 31(4), 529–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano, C., León, H., Perez, E., and Herrero, M., 2001, Characterising objective profiles of Costa Rican dairy farmers . Agricultural Systems 67, 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano, C., León, H., Perez, E., and Herrero, M., 2003, The role of personal information sources on the decision making process of Costa Rican dairy farmers . Agricultural Systems 76, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P., 1988, The Maasai of Matapato: Rituals of Rebellion. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thébaud, B., 2004, Le pastoralisme au Sahel — module d'animation et de formation. Dakar, Senegal: ARED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.M., 2002, Livestock, cultivation and tourism: Livelihood choices and conservation in Maasai Mara buffer zones. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.M., Serneels, S., and Lambin, E.F., 2002, Land-use strategies in the Mara Ecosystem (Kenya): A spatial analysis linking socio-economic data with landscape variables. In: Remote Sensing and GIS Applications for Linking People, Place and Policy, Edited by S.J. Walsh and K.A. Crews-Meyer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., and Homewood, K., 2002, Elites, entrepreneurs and exclusion in Maasailand. Human Ecology 30 (1), 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., BurnSilver, S., Boone, R., and Galvin, K., 2006, Modeling the impacts of group ranch subdivision on agro-pastoral households in Kajiado, Kenya . Agricultural Systems 87, 331–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waithaka, M.M., Ouma, E.A., Kariri, J.M., Ikongo, D.O., Herrero, M., Thornton, P.K., Shepherd, K.D., 2003, Report on characterisation of Kilifi farmers. Nairobi, Kenya: PROSAM Project. International Livestock Research Institute. 21 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., 1994, Identifying target groups for livestock improvement research: The classification of sedentary livestock producers in Western Niger . Agricultural Systems 46(2), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Homewood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serneels, S. et al. (2009). Methods in the Analysis of Maasai Livelihoods. In: Homewood, K., Kristjanson, P., Trench, P.C. (eds) Staying Maasai?. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87492-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics