Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
Urban Ecology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achimore, A. (1993) “Putting the Community Back into Community Retail,” Urban Land 52(8), pp. 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.W. (1973) “Land Speculation and Scattered Development: Failures in the Urban-Fringe Market,” Urban Studies 10, pp. 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I. and M. Zifou (1989) “Urban Development Issues: What is Controversial in Urban Sprawl? An Annotated Bibliography of Often-Overlooked Sources,” Council of Planning Librarians Bibliography No. 247. Chicago, III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I., A.H. Shoemyen and M.T. Smith (1989) “Consumer Preference and the Compact Development Debate,” paper presented at the National Planning Conference of the American Planning Association, Atlanta, Ga., Apr. 29-May 3, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, R.W. (1968) “A Land Speculation Model: The Role of the Property Tax as a Constraint to Urban Sprawl,” Journal of Regional Science 8(2), pp. 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore Regional Council of Governments (1992) Impact of Land Use Alternatives on Transportation Demand. Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (1975) Comparative Evaluation of New Community Growth versus Trend Development Growth. Charles County, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellomo, S.J., R.B. Dial and A.M. Voorhees (1970) “Factors, Trends, and Guidelines Related to Trip Length,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 89. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. and E.A. Medrich (1980) “Children in Four Neighborhoods: The Physical Environment and Its Effect on Play and Play Patterns,” Environment and Behavior 12(3), pp. 320–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. and T. Plaut (1978) “Retaining Agricultural Activities under Urban Pressures: A Review of Land Use Conflicts and Policies,” Policy Sciences 9, pp. 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, C. et al. (1975) Interceptor Sewers and Urban Sprawl. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, F.W. and D.B. Johnson (1968) “Nondescript Streets,” Traffic Quarterly 22(3), pp. 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookout, L.W. (1992) “Neotraditional Town Planning: The Test of the Marketplace,” Urban Land 51(6), pp. 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, R.R. (1963) “Myth versus Reality in Urban Planning,” Land Economics 39(3), pp. 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslaw, J.A. (1990) “Density and Urban Sprawl: Comment,” Land Economics 66(4), pp. 464–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J.K. and D.A. Fansler (1983) “The Economics of Urban Sprawl: Theory and Evidence on the Spatial Size of Cities,” Review of Economics and Statistics 65(3), pp. 479–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L.D. and T.F. Golob (1976) “The Role of Accessibility in Basic Transportation Choice Behavior,” Transportation 5, pp. 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M. (1991) Transportation Efficiency: Tackling Southern California’s Air Pollution and Congestion. Environmental Defense Fund, Oakland, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carp, F.M. (1980) “Environmental Effects Upon the Mobility of Older People,” Environment and Behavior 12(2), pp. 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carp, F.M. (1988) “Significance of Mobility for the Well-Being of the Elderly,” Transportation Research Board Special Report 218, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Urban Policy Research (1992) Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development Plan—Executive Summary. New Jersey Office of State Planning, Trenton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1988) “Land Use Mixing and Suburban Mobility,” Transportation Quarterly 42, pp. 429–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1989) “Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility,” Journal of the American Planning Association 55(2), pp. 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1991a) “Congestion Relief: The Land Use Alternative,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 10, pp. 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. (1991b) “Land Uses and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers,” Transportation Quarterly 45(4), pp. 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M. (1962) “Urban Sprawl and Speculation in Suburban Land,” Land Economics 38(2), pp. 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M. (1971) Suburban Land Conversion in the United States: An Economic and Governmental Process. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, M.R., J.H. Lillydahl and L.D. Singell (1978) “The Effects of Greenbelts on Residential Property Values: Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space,” Land Economics 54, pp. 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalvi, M.Q. and K.M. Martin (1976) “The Measurement of Accessibility: Some Preliminary Results,” Transportation 5, pp. 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, A.H. (1973) “Measuring Benefits Generated by Urban Water Parks,” Land Economics 49, pp. 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCorla-Souza, P. (1991) “Peak Period Tolls: One Cure for Urban Congestion,” ITE 1991 Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCorla-Souza, P. (1992) “The Impacts of Alternative Urban Development Patterns on Highway System Performance,” issue papers for the 1992 ITE International Conference. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didato, B. (Jan. 1990), “The Paths Less Traveled—A Wrapup on the Nation’s Greenways,” Planning 56, pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P.B. and R.D. Gustely (1977) “The Public Service Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Evidence,” in P.B. Downing (ed.), Local Service Pricing Policies and Their Effect on Urban Spatial Structure. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1992) Stuck in Traffic—Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, R.T. and K.M. Fisher (1994) “Transportation, Congestion, and Density: New Insights,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (1991) Developing Successful New Communities. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (1994) “Getting Around a Traditional City, a Suburban PUD, and Everything In-Between,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A. (1982) “The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study,” Land Economics 58(2), pp. 236–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A. (1991) “Good for the Town, Bad for the Nation? A Comment,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(3), pp. 341–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.E. (1989) The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. (1994) “The Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on the Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: The Single Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B.D. (1977) “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (Dec.), pp. 1026–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, W.L. et al. (1959) Studies of Highway Development and Geographic Change. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. and J.S. Dajani (1974) “Energy, Urban Form and Transportation Policy,” Transportation Research 8, pp. 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G. (1989) “Literature Synthesis: Transportation and Urban Form,” report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration under Contract DTFH61-89-P-00531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. and H.L. Wong (1985) “The Costs of Urban Sprawl—Some New Evidence,” Environment and Planning A 17(5), pp. 661–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., A. Kumar and H.W. Richardson (1989) “The Influence of Metropolitan Spatial Structure on Commuting Time,” Journal of Urban Economics 26, pp. 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., H.W. Richardson, and M.J. Jun (1991) “The Commuting Paradox—Evidence from the Top Twenty,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(4), pp. 416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A.M. and C. Cluett (1976) “Analysis of Mass Transit Ridership Using 1970 Census Data,” Traffic Quarterly 30(1), pp. 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. (1986) “Energy and Urban Form: A Human Ecological Critique,” Urban Affairs Quarterly 21(3), pp. 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, T.R., R.E. Coughlin and E.T. Horn (1974) “The Effect of a Large Urban Park on Real Estate Value,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40, pp. 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W.G. (1959) “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25, pp. 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M.E. (1992a) “Automobile Subsidies and Land Use: Estimates and Policy Responses,” Journal of the American Planning Association 58(1), pp. 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M.E. (1992b) Results of a Literature Survey and Summary of Findings: The Nature and Magnitude of Social Costs of Urban Roadway Use. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. and M. Schwab (1987) “Accessibility and Intraurban Travel,” Environment and Planning A 19, pp. 735–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. and E. Deakin (1991) “Toward Improved Regional Transportation Modeling Practice,” paper prepared for the National Association of Regional Councils, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, R.O. and W.A.V. Clark (1965) “The Nature and Economics of Urban Sprawl,” Land Economics 41(1), pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendon, W.S. (1971) “The Park as a Determinant of Property Values,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 30, pp. 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkila, E.J. and R.B. Peiser (1992) “Urban Spawl, Density, and Accessibility,” Papers in Regional Science 71(2), pp. 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzclaw, J. (1991) Explaining Urban Density and Transit Impacts on Auto Use. Sierra Club, San Francisco, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard County Planning Commission (1967) Howard County 1985. Howard County, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D.R. (1971) “The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form,” Regional Studies 5(2), pp. 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, J.G. (1980) “Indicators of Urban Accessibility: Theory and Application,” Transportation 9, pp. 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, J. (1989) “Should We Halt Urban Sprawl?” Florida Trend 31(12), pp. 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulash, W. (1990) “Traditional Neighborhood Development—Will the Traffic Work?” paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Pedestrian Conference, Bellevue, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P. (Spring-Summer 1992) “Open Space That Sells,” Land Development 5, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leake, G.R. and A.S. Huzayyin (1980) “The Impact of Accessibility on Trip Production and Trip Attraction Models,” Engineering and Traffic Control 21(10), pp. 469–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.B. Jr. (1979) “Land Use Planning as a Response to Market Failure,” in J.I. de Neufville (ed.), The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessinger, J. (1962) “The Case for Scatterization,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28(3), pp. 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H.S. and F.H. Wynn (1963) “Effects of Density on Urban Transportation Requirements,” Highway Research Record No. 2, pp. 38–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, I.S. (1988) “Planning for Urban Sprawl,” Transportation Research Board Special Report No. 220, pp. 275–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, J.J. (1994) “The Going Rate: What It Really Costs to Drive,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, D.L. and G.H. Smith (1972) “Environmental Diseconomies in Suburban Expansion,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 31(2), pp. 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P.B. (1984) “The Demand for Local Amenity: An Hedonic Price Analysis,” Environment and Planning A 16, pp. 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (1991) Transportation Demand Impacts of Alternative Land Use Scenarios, Final Report. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlesex Somerset Mercer Regional Council (1991) The Impact of Various Land Use Strategies on Suburban Mobility, Final Report. Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millas, A.J. (1980) “Planning for the Elderly within the Context of a Neighborhood,” Ekistics 283, pp. 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D.E. (1981) “Growth, Speculation, and Sprawl in a Monocentric City,” Journal of Urban Economics 10, pp. 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J.M., P.L. Dumble and M.R. Wigan (1979) “Accessibility Indicators for Transport Planning,” Transportation Research 13A, pp. 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, W.G. (1977) “Large Lot Zoning, Property Taxes, and Metropolitan Area,” Journal of Urban Economics 4(4), pp. 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neels, K. et al. (1977) “An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Land Use on Urban Travel,” Working Paper 5049–17–1. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A.C. (1986) “Towards a Theory of the American Rural Residential Land Market,” Journal of Rural Studies 2, pp. 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A.C. (1990) “Economic Critique of Prime Farmland Preservation Policies in the United States,” Journal of Rural Studies 6(2), pp. 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A.C. (1992) “Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization—Lessons from Oregon,” Journal of the American Planning Association 58(4), pp. 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, M. (1991) “Utopia, Dystopia, and Diaspora,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(3), pp. 344–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P.W.G. and J.R. Kenworthy (1988) “The Transport Energy Trade-Off: Fuel-Efficient Traffic versus Fuel-Efficient Cities,” Transportation Research A 22A(3), pp. 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P.W.G. and J.R. Kenworthy (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence. Gower Technical, Aldershot, Eng.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Central Texas Council of Governments (1990) Urban Form/Transportation System Options for the Future: Dallas/Fort Worth Case Study. Arlington, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohls, J.C. and D. Pines (1975) “Discontinuous Urban Development and Economic Efficiency,” Land Economics 51(3), pp. 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottensmann, J.R. (1977) “Urban Sprawl, Land Values, and the Density of Development,” Land Economics 53(4), pp. 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiser, R.B. (1984) “Does It Pay to Plan Suburban Growth?” Journal of the American Planning Association 50(4), pp. 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiser, R.B. (1989) “Density and Urban Sprawl,” Land Economics 65(3), pp. 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiser, R.B. (1990) “Density and Urban Sprawl—Reply,” Land Economics 66(4), pp. 469–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.E. and H. Yampolsky (1975) Urban Development and the Protection of Metropolitan Farmland. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, G.H. (1979) “Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal,” Environment and Planning A 11, pp. 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, T. (1976) “The Effects of Urbanization on the Loss of Farmland at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A National and Regional Perspective,” Regional Science Research Institute Discussion Paper Series No. 94. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R. (1982) “View Amenities, Building Heights, and Housing Supply,” in D.B. Diamond and G.S. Tolley (eds.), The Economics of Urban Amenities. Academic Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1977) The Suburban Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1979) “Urban Sprawl—Some Neglected Sociological Considerations,” Sociology and Social Research 63(2), pp. 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevedouros, P.D. (1991) “Trip Generation: Different Rates for Different Densities,” paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, D. et al. (1977) Large-Scale Development: Benefits, Constraints, and State and Local Policy Incentives. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Council of Governments (1990) Summary and Comparison Between Alternatives. Vision 2020, Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pushkarev, B.S. and J.M. Zupan (1977) Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., pp. 24–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, P.M. (1975) “Urban Threats to Rural Lands,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41(Nov.), pp. 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real Estate Research Corporation (1974) The Costs of Sprawl, Detailed Cost Analysis. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, M. (1988) Rethinking the Role of the Automobile. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A.J. and W. Young (1982) “A Measure of Linked-Trip Accessibility,” Transportation Planning and Technology 7, pp. 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H.W. and P. Gordon (1993) “Market Planning—Oxymoron or Common Sense?” Journal of the American Planning Association 59(3), pp. 347–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Diego Association of Governments (1991a) “The Relationship Between Jobs/Housing Balance and Travel Patterns in the San Diego Region,” Regional Growth Management Strategy, Appendix 2. San Diego, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Diego Association of Governments (1991b) “Jobs/Housing Balance and Transportation Corridor Densities,” Regional Growth Management Strategy, Appendix 3. San Diego, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, K.H. and E. Sclar (1975) Access for All. Penguin Books, Baltimore, Md., pp. 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuernstuhl, G.J. and J. May (1979) “Analysis of Air Quality Sensitivity to Development Pattern Changes and Growth Levels,” Transportation Research Record 714, pp. 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K.R. (1970) “The Destruction of Urban Space,” Traffic Quarterly 24, pp. 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R. (1967) “Von Thunen and Urban Sprawl,” Annuals of the Association of American Geographers 57, pp. 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W.S. (1986) “Interactions Between Transportation and High-Rise, High-Density Living,” Ekistics 320/321, pp. 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillar, R.J. and G.S. Rutherford (1990) “The Effects of Population Density and Income on Per Capita Transit Ridership in Western American Cities,” ITE 1991 Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R.L. (1994) “Residential Density and Travel Patterns: A Review of the Literature and Methodological Approach,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P.A. (1973) The Structure, Size, and Costs of Urban Settlements. Cambridge University Press, London, Eng.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation (1976) Urban Transportation and Land Use. Washington, D.C., pp. 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickerman, R.W. (1974) “Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility,” Environment and Planning A 6(6), pp. 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, M.T. (1991) “The True Costs of the Automobile: A Basis for Comparison,” Grass Roots to Green Modes. Proceedings of the 12th International Pedestrian Conference, Boulder, Colo., pp. 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, M. and J.G. Koenig (1979) “Behavioral Modelling, Accessibility, Mobility and Travel Need,” in D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher (eds.), Behavioral Travel Modeling. Croom Helm, London, Eng., pp. 698–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J.W. (1976) “An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Accessibility,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6, pp. 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weicher, J.C. and R.H. Zerbst (1973) “The Externalities of Neighborhood Parks: An Empirical Investigation,” Land Economics 49, pp. 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. Jr. (1957) “Urban Sprawl” in The Exploding Metropolis. Doubleday & Company, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Smart Growth Preinkert Field House, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

    Reid H. Ewing

Authors
  1. Reid H. Ewing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195

    John M. Marzluff , Gordon Bradley  & Clare Ryan ,  & 

  2. University of Washington, 3912 NE 127th Street, Seattle, WA 98125

    Eric Shulenberger

  3. Geographisches Institute, Humboldt University Unter den Linden, 10099 Berlin, Germany

    Wilfried Endlicher

  4. University of Washington, Box 355740, Seattle, WA 98195

    Marina Alberti

  5. Humboldt University Miningstrasse 46, 12359 Berlin, Germany

    Ute Simon

  6. University of Washington, Box 355740, Seattle, WA 98195

    Craig ZumBrunnen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ewing, R.H. (2008). Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review. In: Marzluff, J.M., et al. Urban Ecology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation