Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness pp 327–352Cite as

Healthy Settings

Building Evidence for the Effectiveness of Whole System Health Promotion – Challenges and Future Directions

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, J. (1988). Rising to the challenge. Health Service Journal, 20 October, 1232–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Health Promoting Schools Association (2002). National framework for health promoting schools, 2002–2003. http://www.ahpsa.org.au/files/framework.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barí,L. (1993). The settings approach implications for policy and strategy. Journal of the Institute of Health Education, 31, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarićL. (1994). Health promotion and health education in practice. Module 2: The organisational model. Altrincham: Barns Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarićL. & BarićL. (1995) Health promotion and health education. Module 3: Evaluation, quality, audit. Altrincham: Barns Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnekow Rasmussen, V. & Rivett, D. (2000). The European network of health promoting schools an alliance of health, education and democracy. Health Education, 100, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholemew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. H. (2006). Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach (2nd Ed.). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Boss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, F. (1995). Researching public health: beyond the qualitative and quantitative method debate. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessel, T., McDonald, S., Silagy, C., Anderson, J., Hiller, J., & Sansom, L. (2002). Do internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expectations, 5, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L. W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., & Buchholz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 168–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, B., McLean, C., Pennington, A., & Gillies, P. (2006). Using new media to build social capital for health. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 297–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breuker, G. & Schroer, A. (2000). Settings 1 – health promotion in the workplace. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 98–109). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Vol. 3, 2nd Ed., (pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Pergamon Press/Elseiver Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1983). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, D. (2006). Complexity and the health promoting school. In S. Clift & B.Bruun Jensen (Eds.), The health promoting school: International advances in theory, evaluation and practice (pp. 41–53). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish University of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P. & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. In K. Fulbright-Anderson, A. C. Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Volume 2: Theory, measurement, and analysis, (pp. 15–44). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, J. (2001). Critical realism and health promotion: Effective practice needs an effective theory. Health Education Research, 16, 115–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costongs, C. & Springett, J. (1997). Joint working and the production of a city health plan: The Liverpool experience. Health Promotion International, 12, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health, Social Services & Public Safety (2002). Investing for health. Belfast: DHSSPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschesnes, M., Martin, C., & Jomphe Hill, A. (2003). Comprehensive approaches to school health promotion: How to achieve broader implementation? Health Promotion International, 18, 387–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M (2001). The “health promoting university”: A critical exploration of theory and practice. Health Education, 101, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M. (2004). Joining up settings for health: a valuable investment for strategic partnerships? Critical Public Health, 14, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M. (2006a). Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promotion International, 21, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M. (2006b). Health promoting settings: future directions. Promotion & Education, 13, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M. & Hunter, D. (2007). Organisations and settings for public health. In S. Handsley, C. Lloyd, J. Douglas, S. Earle & S. Spurr (Eds.),Policy and practice in promoting public health. London: Sage/Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M., Dowding, G., Thompson, J., & Wynne, C. (1998). The settings-based approach to health promotion. In A. Tsouros, G. Dowding, J. Thompson, & M. Dooris (Eds.), Health promoting universities: Concept, experience and framework for action (pp. 18–28). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, J., Robertson, A., Poland, B., Coburn, D. & Edwards, R. (1996). Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promotion International. 11, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng, T. (2002). eHealth research and evaluation: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 267–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, K. (2006). eHealth promotion: the use of the internet for health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 20, 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French, W. & Bell, C. (1999). Organisation development: Behavioural science interventions for organisation improvement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, G., Powis, B., & Tamplin, S. (2000). Healthy islands in the Western Pacific – international settings development. Health Promotion International, 15, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity – A platform for designing business architecture. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, M. (2001). Part 3: Settings – introduction. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives (pp. 209–211). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W. & Kreuter, M. (2005). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., Poland, B. D., & Rootman, I. (2000). The settings approach to health promotion. In B. D. Poland, L. W. Green, & I. Rootman (Eds.), Settings for health promotion: Linking theory and practice (pp. 1–43). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., Richard, L. & Potvin, L. (1996). Ecological foundations of health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 270–281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groene, O. & Garcia-Barbero, M. (Eds.) (2005). Health promotion in hospitals: Evidence and quality management. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. & Scala, K. (1993). Health promotion and organisational development: Developing settings for health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirji, F. (2004). Freedom or folly? Canadians and the consumption of online health information. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, M. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: confronting complexity. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. & Waters, E. (2005) Guidelines: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Melbourne:Cochrane Collaboration – Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health Field.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, R. & Murcott, A. (1998). Community representativeness: Representing the ѣommunityѿ Social Science and Medicine, 46, 843–858.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. & Douglas, J. from 1st draft by Adams, L. (2002). The politics of health promotion. In L. Jones, M. Sidell, & J. Douglas (Eds.). The challenge of promoting health: Exploration and action (pp. 143–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • julnes, G., Mark, M., & Henry, G. (1998). Promoting realism in evaluation: Realistic evaluation and the broader context. Evaluation,4, 483–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, B. & Goodstadt, M. (2001). The interactive domain model of best practices in health promotion: Developing and implementing a best practices approach to health promotion. Health Promotion Practice, 2, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegler, M. C., Twiss, J. M., & Look, V. (2000). Assessing community change at multiple levels: The genesis of an evaluation framework for the California Healthy Cities Project. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 760–779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. (2005). Practical suggestions for community interventions using participatory action research. Public Health Nursing, 22(1), 65–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koerin, B. (2003). The settlement house tradition: current trends and future concerns. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXX(2), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (1995). An overview to the settings-based approach to health promotion. In T. Theaker & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Settings-based approach to health promotion: Report of an international working conference, 17–20 November 1993 (pp. 3–9). Welwyn Garden City: Hertfordshire Health Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (1996). Tribute to Aaron Antonovsky – “what creates health”? Health Promotion International, 11, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2003). The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 383–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, L. (2002). Education reform and the goals of modern school health programs. The State Education Standard: The Quarterly Journal of the National Association of State Boards of Education, 3, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, L. (2005). A framework for school health programs in the 21st Century. Journal of School Health, 75, 226–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, L., Jones, J., Birdthistle, I., & Vince-Whitman, C. (2000). Building the capacity of schools to improve the health of nations. In C. E. Koop, C. E. Pearson, & M. R. Schwarz (Eds.), Critical Issues in Global Health (pp. 212–220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, L., Tirozzi, G., Marx, E., Bobbitt-Cooke, M., Riedel, S., Jones, J., & Schmoyer, M. (2005). Health programs for school employees: Improving quality of life, health & productivity. Promotion & Education, 12, 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Cheng, F., & St Leger, L (2005). Evaluating health promoting schools in Hong Kong: the development of a framework. Health Promotion International ,20, 177–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, E. de & Skovgaard, T. (2005). Utility-driven evidence for healthy cities: problems with evidence generation and application. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1331–1341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, M., Yen, I., & Minkler, M. (2004). Community based participatory research: A promising approach for increasing epidemiology–s relevance in the 21st century. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 499–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lister-Sharp, D., Chapman, S., Stewart-Brown, S., & Soden, A. (1999). Health promoting schools and health promotion in school: Two systematic reviews. Health Technology Assessment, 3(22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohrmann, D. (2006). Creating a healthy school using the healthy school report card. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, C. & Skinner, H. (2003–2004). “A virtual hug” Prospects for self-help online. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 2, 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, C., Zakus, D., & Skinner, H. (2002). Youth social action: Building a global latticework through informtion and communication technologies. Health Promotion International, 17, 363–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorence, D.P. & Greenberg, L. (2006). The zeitgeist of online health search: Implications for a consumer-centric health system. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 134–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, M. & Blamey, A. (2005). The practice and the theory: Lessons from the applications of a Theories of Change approach. Evaluation, 11, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. (2003). Bio-medical Topoi – the dominance of space, the recalcitrance of place, and the making of persons. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 2343–2351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L., Belzer, E. G., Manchester, L., Blanchard, W., Officer, S., & Simpson, A. C. (1996) The Dartmouth health promotion study: A failed quest for synergy in school health promotion. Journal of School Health, 66, 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L. & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 6–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. (2002). The evidence debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 83–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. & Lippman, L. (2004). What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moysés, S.J., Moysés, S.T., McCarthy, M., & Sheiham, A. (2006). Intra-urban differentials in child dental trauma in relation to Healthy Cities policies in Curitiba, Brazil. Health and Place, 12, 48–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mũkhoma, W. & Flisher, A. (2004). Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies. Health Promotion International, 19, 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P., Evans, D., Forster, J., Gottlieb, N., Kreuter, M., Moon, R., O’Rourke, T., & Stretcher, V. (1995). Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 329–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Health & Medical Research Council (1996). Effective school health promotion: towards health promoting schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H., Carrieri-Kholman, V., Rankin, S., Slaugher, R., & Sulbarg, M. (2004). Supporting cardiac recovery through eHealth technology. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19, 200–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, C. & Skinner, H. (2006). eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8, e9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (1999). The challenge to provide ℌevidence“ in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 14, 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health promotion effectiveness – the questions to be answered. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 1–11). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M., Pederson, A., & Rootman, I. (2000). Health promotion in Canada: declining or transforming? Health Promotion International,15, 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) (2005). Healthy municipalities, cities and communities: Evaluation recommendations for policymakers in the Americas. Washington: PAHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, K., Sengupta, S., & Hassan, L. (2005). Settings, systems and organisation development: the Healthy Living and Working Model. Health Promotion International, 20, 81–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: An introduction. RMP Methods Paper 2/2004 Manchester: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plsek, P.E. & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in healthcare. British Medical Journal, 323, 625–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poland, B., Frohlich, K., & Cargo, M. (2007). Context as a fundamental dimension of health promotion program evaluation. In L. Potvin, D. McQueen, L. Anderson, Z. Hartz, & L. de Salazar (Eds.), Health Promotion Effectiveness in Context: Issues and Perspectives from the Americas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland, B. (1996). Knowledge development and evaluation in, of, and for healthy community initiatives. Part I: Guiding principles. Health Promotion International, 11, 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., Gordon, P., & Plamping, D. (1999). Working whole systems: Putting theory into practice in organizations. London: King’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D. (2000) The question of evidence in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 15, 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo, H.E., Llanos, G., Contrera, A., Rocabado, F., Gross, S., Suárez, J., & González, J. (1996). The PAHO/WHO experience: Healthy municipalities in Latin America. In C. Price & A. Tsouros (Eds.) Our cities, our future: Policies and action plans for health and sustainable development. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowling, L. & Jeffreys, V. (2006). Capturing complexity: Integrating health and education research to inform health-promoting schools policy and practice. Health Education Research, 21, 705–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield, D., Volansky, M., Caspersen, C., Engelgau, M., Bowman, B., Gregg, E., Geiss, L.S., Hosey, G.M., May, J., & Vinicor, F. (2003). Community-based lifestyle interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 26, 2643–2652.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Health Promoting Schools Unit. (2006). Health promoting schools. (http://www.healthpromotingschools.co.uk/index.asp accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H., Biscope, S., & Poland, B. (2003). Quality of internet access: Barrier behind internet use statistics. Social Science and Medicine,57, 875–880.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H., Biscope, S., Poland, B., & Goldberg, E. (2003). How adolescents use technology for health information: Implications for health professionals from focus group studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5, e32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, N & Strobl, J. (Eds.) (1996). Healthy prisons – a vision for the future. Report of the first international conference on healthy prisons, Liverpool, 24–27 March 1996. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Leger, L. (1997). Health promoting settings: From Ottawa to Jakarta. Health Promotion International 12, 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Leger, L. (2006). Communication technologies and health promotion: Opportunities and challenges. Health Promotion International 21, 169–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St Leger, L. & Nutbeam, D. (2000). Settings 2 – effective health promotion in schools. In International Union for Health Promotion and Education The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. Shaping public health in a new Europe. Part two: Evidence book (pp. 110–122). Brussels – Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC. 2nd edition. Paris: Jouve Composition & Impression.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stame, N. (2004). Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation, 10, 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, A., McLeray, K., & Goodman R. (1992). Towards integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and, specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (Health Evidence Network Report http://www.who.dk/Document/E88185.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 282–293.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suggs, L.S. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in new technologies for health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 61–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tones, K. (1997). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a case for “udicial review”Health Education Research, 12, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tones, K. & Green, J. (2004). Health promotion: planning and strategies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsouros, A. (Ed.) (1991). World Health Organization healthy cities project: A project becomes a movement. Review of progress 1987–1990. Copenhagen:FADL Publishers/Milan: SOGESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsouros, A.D. (1995). The WHO healthy cities project: State of the art and future plans. Health Promotion International, 10, 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsouros, A.D., Dowding, G., Thompson, J., & Dooris, M. (Eds.) (1998). Health promoting universities: Concept, experience and framework for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2005). School health index: a self-assessment and planning guide. (http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/SHI/paper.htm accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2006a). Healthy schools, healthy youth. (http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/index.htm accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control. (2006b). The school health policies and programs study. (http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/shpps/index.htm (accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2002). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review (Jan–Feb), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, E. (1997). A comment on settings in health promotion. Internet Journal of Health Promotion. (http://www.ldb.org/setting.htm accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, Canada: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharf Higgins, J. (1992). The healthy community movement in Canada. In B. Wharf (Ed.), Communities and social policy in Canada (pp. 151–189). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelaw, S., Baxendale, A., Bryce, C., Machardy, L., Young, I., & Witney, E. (2001). Settings based health promotion: A review. Health Promotion International, 16, 339–353.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. H. (2003). The determinants of health: Structure, context and agency. Sociology of Health & Illness 25(3), 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (WHO) (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Adopted at an International Conference on Health Promotion – The Move Towards a New Public Health (co-sponsored by the Canadian Public Health Association, Health and Welfare Canada, and the World Health Organization), Nov 17–21, Ottawa, Canada. (http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1991). Sundsvall statement on supportive environments for health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1996). Health-promoting schools series 5: Regional guidelines. Development of health-promoting schools– A framework for action. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1997a). Jakarta declaration on health promotion into the 21 st century . Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1997b). Promoting health through schools. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion. World Health Organization Technical Report Series, 870(i–vi), 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1998a). Health promotion glossary. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1998b). Health21: The health for all policy for the WHO European region – 21 targets for the 21st century. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2002a). Integrated management of healthy settings at the district level. Report of an intercountry consultation. Gurgaon, India, 7–11 May 2001. New Delhi: WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2002b). Healthy cities initiative: Approaches and experience in the African region. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2004). Healthy marketplaces in the Western Pacific: Guiding future action. Applying a settings approach to the promotion of health in marketplaces. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2005). Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world . Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2006a). Healthy environments for children alliance inter-regional consultation: Improving children’s environmental health in settings – experiences and lessons for policies and action. Report of meeting held in Entebbe, Uganda from 29 November to 2 December 2005. Geneva: WHO (Healthy Environments for Children Alliance Secretariat).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2006b) School health and youth health promotion. (http://www.who.int/school_youth_health/en/ accessed 06 October 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziglio, E., Hagard, S., & Griffiths, J. (2000). Health promotion development in Europe: Achievements and challenges. Health Promotion International, 15, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., Lindberg, C., & Plsek, P. (2001). Edgeware: Insights from complexity science for health care leaders, 2nd Ed. Irving, Texas: VHA Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark Dooris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blake Poland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lloyd Kolbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Evelyne de Leeuw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Douglas S. McCall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joan Wharf-Higgins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States

    David V. McQueen

  2. International Union for Health Promotion and Education, Saint-Denis, France

    Catherine M. Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dooris, M., Poland, B., Kolbe, L., de Leeuw, E., McCall, D.S., Wharf-Higgins, J. (2007). Healthy Settings. In: McQueen, D.V., Jones, C.M. (eds) Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70973-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70974-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation