Skip to main content
  • 1408 Accesses

Scaling the supply voltage (Vdd) and threshold voltages (Vth) to an optimal point for a design can provide substantial power savings, particularly at a relaxed performance constraint. We will examine how Vdd, Vth and gate size affect the circuit delay, dynamic power and leakage power with analytical models. We compare these models to empirical fits for a 0.13um library characterized at different Vdd and Vth values. These models help us examine the trade-off between power and delay, and determine which power reduction techniques can provide the most benefit in different situations. In this chapter, we focus on use of a single supply voltage (Vdd) and a single threshold voltage (Vth). In Chapter 7, we will examine use of multiple supply and multiple threshold voltages in comparison to using a single Vdd and single Vth. Throughout this chapter, we assume that the NMOS and PMOS threshold voltages are of about the same magnitude, Vthn = –Vthp, and will generally refer to this value as the threshold voltage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avant!, Star-Hspice Manual, 1998, 1714 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brglez, F., and Fujiwara, H., “A neutral netlist of 10 combinational benchmark circuits and a target translator in Fortran, ” in Proceedings of the International Symposium Circuits and Systems, 1985, pp. 695-698.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brodersen, R., et al., “Methods for True Power Minimization, ” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2002, pp. 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burd, T. “Low-Power CMOS Library Design Methodology, ” M. S. Report, University of California, Berkeley, UCB/ERL M94/89, 1994, 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrakasan, A., and Brodersen, R., “Minimizing Power Consumption in Digital CMOS Circuits, ” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 83, no. 4, April 1995, pp. 498-523.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chinnery, D., Low Power Design Automation, Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De, V., et al., “Techniques for Leakage Power Reduction, ” chapter in Design of High- Performance Microprocessor Circuits, IEEE Press, 2001, pp. 48-52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, D., Blaauw, D., and Sylvester, D., “Gate Oxide Leakage Current Analysis and Reduction for VLSI Circuits, ” IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, 2004, pp. 155-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nose, K., and Sakurai, T., “Optimization of VDD and VTH for Low-Power and High-Speed Applications, ” in Proceedings of the Asia South Pacific Design Automation Conference, 2000, pp. 469-474.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabaey, J. M., Digital Integrated Circuits. Prentice-Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roy, K., Mukhopadhyay, S., and Mahmoodi-Meimand, H., “Leakage Current Mechanisms and Leakage Reduction Techniques in Deep-Submicrometer CMOS Circuits, ” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, no. 2, 2003, pp. 305-327.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sakurai, T., and Newton, R., “Delay Analysis of Series-Connected MOSFET Circuits, ” Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, no. 2, February 1991, pp. 122-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sirichotiyakul, S., et al., “Stand-by Power Minimization through Simultaneous Threshold Voltage Selection and Circuit Sizing, ” in Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, 1999, pp. 436-441.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stojanovic, V., et al., “Energy-Delay Tradeoffs in Combinational Logic Using Gate Sizing and Supply Voltage Optimization, ” in Proceedings of the European Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2002, pp. 211-214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sutherland, I., Sproull, R., and Harris, D., Logical Effort: Designing Fast CMOS Circuits, Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veendrick, H., “Short-circuit dissipation of static CMOS circuitry and its impact on the design of buffer circuits, ” Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-19, Aug. 1984, pp. 468-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Q., and Vrudhula, S., “Algorithms for Minimizing Standby Power in Deep Submicrometer, Dual-Vt CMOS Circuits, ” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, 2002, pp. 306-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chinnery, D., Keutzer, K. (2007). Voltage Scaling. In: Closing the Power Gap Between ASIC & Custom. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68953-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68953-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25763-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68953-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics