Skip to main content

Enhanced End-Use Efficiency

  • Chapter
  • 833 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is about energy success stories and potential success stories. Since the oil embargo, the United States has reduced its energy-use growth rate from 4.4% per year (1960–70) to about 1% per year. The nation’s appetite for energy rose from 74 quads in 1973 to 100 quads in 2004, a much smaller rise than the 1972 Atomic Energy Commission projection of 160 quads for 2000. Electric power consumption actually grew by 2% per year in the 1990s, reaching an average power of 450GWe in 2004. This growth was also well below the 1972 Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) projection of 2000 GWe for the year 2000. The reason energy use by 2000 had not matched expectations is found in enhanced end-use efficiency. The United States has saved 50% of energy use on new autos (other than SUVs), houses and refrigerators since the oil embargo of 1973–74. Appliance standards saved the building of 50 large power plants, which would have consumed 3 quads/year. Energy demand could be cut by another 50% on new cars and houses, but it must be shown that these yeoman technologies are cost effective. Over a 10–20 year period, thicker insulation is cost effective, but it is far cheaper as installed on new construction, compared to when it is retrofitted to existing houses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Brown, R. and J. Koomey (2003). Electricity use in California: Past trends and present usage patterns, Energy Policy 31, 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., M.D. Levine, J.P. Romm, A. Rosenfeld and J. Koomey (1998). Engineering-economic studies of energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Five DOE Laboratory Study), Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 23, 287–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1986). Cogeneration: Efficient energy source, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 11, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, J., E. Worrell and K. Blok (1998). Future technologies for energy-efficient iron and steel making, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 23, 123–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, K., G.I. Rochlin, R.H. Socolow, et al. (1975). The Efficient Use of Energy, American Institute of Physics Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., T. Johansson, A. Reddy and R. Williams (1985). End-use global energy strategy, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 10, 613–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafemeister, D., H. Kelly and B. Levi (Eds.) (1985). Energy Sources: Conservation and Renewables, American Institute of Physics Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. (1997). Electric utilities in transition, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 22, 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreith, F. and R. West (1997). CRC Handbook of Energy Efficiency, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLarnon, F. and E. Cairns (1989). Energy storage. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 14, 241–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadal, S. (2002). Energy end-use and conservation: Appliance and equipment standards, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 159–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001). Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It, 1978–2000? National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1989). Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing, OTA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1993). Industrial Energy Efficiency, OTA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. and M. Ross (1978). Some energy problem, problems and solutions, Phys. Teacher 16, 272–279.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A. (1999). The art of energy efficiency: Protecting the environment with better technology, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 24, 33–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A., et al. (2000) Phys. Today 53, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A., T. Kaarsberg and J. Romm (2002). Technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, Phys. Today 53(11), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. and I. Walker (1998). Can duct tape take the heat? Home Energy 15(4), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M., I.S. Walker and D.J. Dickerhoff (2000). Stopping Duct Quacks: Longevity of Residential Duct Sealants, Proc. 2000 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Washington DC. [LBNL-45423]

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., R. Hawarth and H. Geller (1990). US energy use from 1973 to 1987: The impact of improved efficiency, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 15, 455–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenung, S., J.M. Eyer, J.J. Iannucci and S. Horgan (1996). Energy storage for a competitive market, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 21, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hafemeister, D. (2007). Enhanced End-Use Efficiency. In: Physics of Societal Issues. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68909-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics