Skip to main content
Book cover

Brain Death pp 208–214Cite as

Legal Considerations on the Determination and Certification of Human Death

  • Chapter
  • 762 Accesses

Abstract

During the last several decades physicians and the public have needed urgent changes in the legal codes for accepting brain death (BD) as death, in order to obtain organs from heart-beating donors. As transplantation has become increasingly more effective, the demand for organs has outpaced the supply. Patients in need of organ transplants are dying needlessly because of the paucity of organs. The needs of tissues and organs for treatment through transplantation and the demand for organs quickly outpaced the supply; consequently, it became evident that standards and priorities needed to be established in order to allocate the increasingly scarce number of organs for transplantation. The transplant community continues to grapple with the organ-sharing shortage, to find new and inventive ways to increase the donor pool, and to allocate organs in a fair and equitable way based on sound scientific decision making, while enhancing the science of transplantation. The “dead donor rule” requires that donors must first be declared dead.1–9

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shewmon DA. The dead donor rule: lessons from linguistics? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004;14:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veatch RM. Abandon the dead donor rule or change the definition of death? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004;14:261–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crowley-Matoka M, Arnold RM. The dead donor rule: how much does the public care⋯ and how much should we care? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004;14:319–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fost N. Reconsidering the dead donor rule: is it important that organ donors be dead? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004;14:249–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veatch RM. The dead donor rule: true by definition. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3:10–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siminoff LA. The dead donor rule: not dead yet. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3:30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shelton W. Respect for donor autonomy and the dead donor rule. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3:20–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pasquerella L, Smith S, Ladd R. Infants, the dead donor rule, and anencephalic organ donation: should the rules be changed? Med Law. 2001;20:417–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson JA. The dead donor rule. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999;29:6–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernat JL. Ethical and legal aspects of the emergency management of brain death and organ retrieval. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987;5:661–676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernat JL, D'Alessandro AM, Port FK et al. Report of a national conference on donation after cardiac death. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:281–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernat JL. Philosophical and Ethical Aspects of Brain Death. In: Wijdicks EFM, ed. Brain Death. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:171–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Machado C. [Resolution for the determination and certification of death in Cuba]. Rev Neurol. 2003;36:763–770.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Deynse D, Dumont V, Lecomte C et al. Non-heart-beating donor, renewal of an old procedure: a Belgian experience. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:2821–2822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Randhawa G. Procuring organs for transplantation—a European perspective. Eur J Public Health. 1998;8:299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spital A. Consent for organ donation: today and tomorrow. Semin Dial. 1993;6:264–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nys H. Therapeutic use of human organs and tissues under Belgian law. Med Law. 1993;12:131–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Toussaint C. The new act regulating organ retrieval for transplantation in Belgium. Contrib Nephrol. 1989;71:141–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nojszewska M. [Determination of brain death]. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2002;36: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andres J, Macheta A. [Persistent vegetative state: medical, moral, legal and economic aspects]. Folia Med Cracov. 1998;39:73–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lao M, Rowinski W, Walaszewski J, Szmidt J. Renal transplantation in Warsaw: a registry report. Transplant Proc. 1996;28:3497–3503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Michalak G, Danielewicz R, Ostrowski K, Barcikowska B, Walaszewski JE, Rowinski WA. Is the decreased number of renal transplants in Warsaw caused by a shortage of potential organ donors?: an analysis of hospital deaths in Warsaw in 1993. Transplant Proc. 1996;28:270–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rowinski W, Ostrowski K, Adadynski L et al. Factors limiting renal transplantation program in Poland. Ann Transplant. 1996;1:18–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baran E, Sych M. [Medico-legal circumstances of organ transplantation in Poland (history and present state)]. Przegl Lek. 1996;53:883–885.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowinski WA, Walaszewski J, Madej K, Szmidt J, Lao M. Demand and supply of kidneys for transplantation in Poland. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:3129.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sych M. [Committee of Medical Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Cracow. Report on a closed session entitled: “Criteria of sudden intravital brain death” and held on December 17, 1974]. Folia Med Cracov. 1976;18:311–314.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pena JR. [Kidney transplant: the current situation in Portugal, 1989]. Acta Med Port. 1989;suppl 2:S11–S15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uniform determination of Death Act. Conn Med. 1982;46:259–260.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Day L. Practical limits to the Uniform Determination of Death Act. J Neurosurg Nurs. 1995;27:319–322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Determination of death (Uniform Determination of Death Act of 1981); natural death (Natural Death Act of 1981). Lexis DC Code DC. 1982;Sect. 6.2401 6.2421 to 6.2430 amended Feb 1982:Unknown.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abram MB. The need for uniform law on the determination of death. NY Law Sch Law Rev. 1982;27:1187–1205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. National Organ Transplant Act: Public Law 98–507. US Statut Large. 1984;98:2339–2348.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adams RK. Live organ donors and informed consent. A difficult minuet. J Leg Med. 1987;8:555–586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonald JC. The National Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. JAMA. 1988;259:725–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Arpesella G, Gherardi S, Bombardini T, Picano E. Recruitment of aged donor heart with pharmacological stress echo. A case report. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2006;4:3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Asano Y, Ashikari J. [Report from the Japan organ transplant network]. Nippon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2005;47:517–523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perez-Tamayo R. [The law, the medical ethic, and the transplants]. Rev Invest Clin. 2005;57:170–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hattori M, Iwaki Y. [Organs shortage in the United States]. Nippon Rinsho. 2005;63:1888–1897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Muller C, Vernet D, Moretti D, Klinger S, Vernet JP. [Organ donation in Switzerland]. Ther Umsch. 2005;62:437–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Monnier M, Weber T. [The Transplantation Law of October 8, 2004]. Ther Umsch. 2005;62:433–435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dimond B. Law concerning organ transplants and dead donors in the UK. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:47–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Murray JE. The first successful organ transplants in man. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Slooff MJ, Kazemier G. [Liver transplantation from a living donor]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004;148:2257–2259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Peron AL, Rodrigues AB, Leite DA et al. Organ donation and transplantation in Brazil: university students' awareness and opinions. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:811–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Machado C. A definition of human death should not be related to organ transplants. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:201–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Nemec P. [Ethical questions in organ transplantation]. Vnitr Lek. 2002;48:667–670.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. [Transplantation and outcome quality]. Chirurg. 2002;73:576–581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Luna-Zaragoza D, Reyes-Frias ML. Donation transplants and tissue banking in Mexico. Cell Tissue Bank. 2001;2:255–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jennett B. Transplants—are the donors really dead? Br Med J. 1980;281:1423–1424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Machado C. Determination of death. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:592–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Machado C, Abeledo M, Alvarez C et al. Cuba has passed a law for the determination and certification of death. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;550:139–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Machado C, Garcia OD, Gutierrez J, Portela L, Garcia MC. Heart rate variability in comatose and brain-dead patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2859–2860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Machado-Curbelo C. [Do we defend a brain oriented view of death?]. Rev Neurol. 2002;35:387–396.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Machado C. Consciousness as a definition of death: its appeal and complexity. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1999;30:156–164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ley No. 59 del 16 de Julio de 1987 (Codigo Civil). Edicion Extraordinaria no. 9. Gaceta Oficial de la Republica de Cuba. Ciudad de La Habana: Ministerio de Justicia, 1987:39–81.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Resolucion no. 90 de Salud Publica. Edicion Ordinaria del 21 de Septiembre del 2001. Ciudad de La Habana: Ministerio de Justicia, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Machado C, García OD. Guidelines for the determination of brain death. In: Machado C, ed. Brain Death (Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Brain Death). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1995:75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Machado C. Is the concept of brain death secure? In: Zeman A, Enamorado A, eds. Ethical Dilemmas in Neurology. London: WB Saunders, 2000:193–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Machado, C. (2007). Legal Considerations on the Determination and Certification of Human Death. In: Brain Death. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38977-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics