Skip to main content

Applications to Cognitive Systems: Beyond Computationalism

  • Chapter
  • 923 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aakerlund, L. and Hemmingsen, R., 1998. Neural networks as models of Psychopathology. Biological Psychiatry, 43: 471–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alfinito, E., Viglione, R.G. and Vitiello, G., 2001. The decoherence criterion. Modern Physics Letters B, 15: 127–136.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M.A. and Fellous, J.-M., 2004. Emotions: from brain to robot. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 554–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L.N., 1992. Cognitive Science: An overview for cognitive scientists. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R., 1993. Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R.D., 1995. A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 72: 173–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S., 1992. What Robots can and can’t be. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. and Zenzen, M., 2003. Superminds: People harness hypercomputation and more. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A., 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47: 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caelli, T., Guan, L. and Wen, W., 1999. Modularity in neural computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87: 1497–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Honda, M. and Hallet, M., 1998. Integrative visuomotor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79: 1567–1573.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.M., 1977. Why Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 1: 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J.H., 2001. Computers and cognition: Why minds are not machines. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., 1981. Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., 1983. The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., 1987. Psychosemantics. The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W.J., 1999. Noise-induced first-order phase transitions in chaotic brain activity. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 9: 2215–2218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W.J., 2000. Neurodynamics: An exploration of mesoscopic brain dynamics. Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • French, R., 1999. Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3: 128–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Pedrajas, N., Hervás-Martínez, C. and Muñoz-Pérez, J., 2002. Multi-objective cooperative coevolution of artificial neural networks (multi-objective cooperative networks). Neural Networks, 15: 1259–1278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M.S. (Ed.), 2004. The Cognitive Neurosciences III: Third Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globus, G.G., Pribram, K.H. and Vitiello, G. (Eds.), 2004. Brain and being. At the boundary between science, philosophy, language and arts. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W. and Scott, A.C. (Eds.), 1996. Toward a science of consciousness I. The first Tucson discussions and debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S.R., Kaszniak, A.W. and Scott, A.C. (Eds.), 1998. Toward a science of consciousness II. The second Tucson discussions and debates. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S.R. and Penrose, R., 1996. Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3: 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S., 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42: 335–346.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, L., 1997. Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument. Minds and Machines, 7: 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, H. and Machleidt, W., 1992. Basic emotions reflected in EEG-coherence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13: 225–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J.E. and Biederman, I., 1992. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99: 480–517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, J. and Kaneko, K., 2000. Self-organized hierarchical structure in a plastic network of chaotic units. Neural Networks, 13: 275–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jibu, M. and Yasue, K., 1995. Quantum Brain Dynamics and Consciousness: An Introduction. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibu, M. and Yasue, K., 2004. Quantum brain dynamics and Quantum Field Theory. In G.G. Globus, K.H. Pribram and G. Vitiello (Eds.). Brain and being. At the boundary between science, philosophy, language and arts (pp. 267–290). Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C.G. (Ed.), 1989. Artificial Life. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, S. and Margolis, E., 2002. Radical concept nativism. Cognition, 86: 22–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P.H. and Norman, D.A., 1972. Human Information Processing. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, B.J., 2001. ‘Transcending Turing computability’. Technical Report UT-CS-01-473, Department of Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (Eds.), 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 2 voll. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. and Cohen, N.J., 1989. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In G.H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation. Advances in research and theory (vol. 24, pp. 109–165). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H.A., 1976. Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the ACM, 19: 113–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T.A. and Chénier, V., 1999. Variations in EEG coherence as an index of the affective content of dreams from REM sleep: Relationship with face imagery. Brain and Cognition, 41:200–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., 1980. Twelve issues for Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 4: 1–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, P.L., 2000. Toward a quantitative description of large scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23: 371–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S.E. and Kimchi, R., 1986. The information processing approach to cognition. In T.J. Knapp and L.C. Robertson (Eds.). Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies (pp. 37–77). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R., 1994. Shadows of the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessa, E., 2004. Quantum connectionism and the emergence of cognition. In G.G. Globus, K.H. Pribram and G. Vitiello (Eds.). Brain and being. At the boundary between science, philosophy, language and arts (pp. 127–145). Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessa, E. and Terenzi, G., 2002. A Neural Solution to Symbol Grounding Problem. In M. Marinaro and R. Tagliaferri (Eds.), Neural Nets — WIRN 01 (pp.248–255). Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessa, E. and Vitiello, G., 2004a. Quantum noise, entanglement and chaos in the Quantum Field Theory of Mind/Brain states. Mind and Matter, 1: 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessa, E. and Vitiello, G., 2004b. Quantum noise induced entanglement and chaos in the dissipative quantum model of brain. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 18: 841–858.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Piaget, J, and Chomsky, N. (Eds.), 1980. Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, R. and Van Gelder, T.J. (Eds.), 1995. Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pour-El, M.B. and Richards, I., 1983. Computability and noncomputability in classical analysis. Transactions of American Mathematical Society, 275: 539–560.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pour-El, M.B. and Richards, I., 1989. Computability in analysis and physics. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. and Bishop, M. (Eds.), 2002. Views into the Chinese Room: New essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z.W., 1984. Computation and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., 1990. Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97: 285–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S.K., 1988. Cognition. Theory and application. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Berndt, R. (Eds.), 1996. Neural modeling of brain and cognitive disorders. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggia, J.A., Ruppin, E. and Glanzman, D.L. (Eds.), 1999. Disorders of brain, behavior, and cognition: The neurocomputational perspective. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J.P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B. and Varela, F.J., 1999. Perception’s shadow: Long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397: 430–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarnthein, J., Petsche, H., Rappelsberger, P., Shaw, G.L. and Von Stein, A., 1998. Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95: 7092–7096.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R., 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R., 1999. The Mystery of Consciousness. A New York Review Book, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelmann, H.T., 1999. Neural networks and analog computation: Beyond the Turing limit. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W., 1999. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24: 49–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A., 2002. The irrelevance of Turing machines to AI. In M. Scheutz (Ed.). Computationalism: New directions (pp.87–127). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E.S., Breinlinger, K., Macombe, J. and Jacobson, K., 1992. Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99: 605–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stannett, M., 2001. ‘An introduction to post-Newtonian and non-Turing computation’. Technical Report CS-91-02. Department of Computer Science, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. and Ludik, J. (Eds.), 1998. Neural networks and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillings, N.A., Weisler, S.E., Chase, C.H., Feinstein, M.H., Garfield, J.L. and Rissland, EX., 1995. Cognitive Science. An introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J.P. and Jamieson, I.M.D., 2002. Reconfigurable networking for coordinated multi-agent sensing and communications. Information Sciences, 148: 103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tani, J., 2003. Learning to generate articulated behavior through the bottom-up and the top-down interaction processes. Neural Networks, 16: 11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark, M., 2000. Why the brain is probably not a quantum computer. Information Sciences, 128: 155–179.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tschacher, W. and Dauwalder, J.-P. (Eds.), 1999. Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous Agents: Nonlinear systems approaches to Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science. World Scientific, Singapore.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., 1983. Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velde, F. and De Kamps, M., 2002. Synchrony in the eye of the beholder: An analysis of the role of neural synchronization in cognitive processes. Brain and Mind, 3: 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T.J., 1998. The dynamical hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21: 615–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T.J., 1999. Dynamic approaches to cognition. In R. Wilson and F. Keil (Eds.). The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (pp. 244–246). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitiello, G., 1995. Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 9, 973–989.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitiello, G., 2001. My double unveiled. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, X., 1999. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87: 1423–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wermter, S. and Sun, R., 2000. Hybrid neural systems. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, M., 2000. Dynamics of intelligent systems. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 39:2107–2140.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z.-H., Jiang, Y. and Chen, S,-F., 2003. Extracting symbolic rules from trained neural network ensembles. AI Communications, 16: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Applications to Cognitive Systems: Beyond Computationalism. In: Collective Beings. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35941-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics