Skip to main content

Tumors of the Breast

  • Chapter
Cancer Grading Manual

Abstract

Breast carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in women in North America and Europe. Invasive mammary carcinoma, like the pre-invasive tumors that typically precede it, can be readily recognized and graded in surgically removed or biopsied tissue samples. The grading and staging of these tumors are of considerable clinical significance and are performed routinely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Books and Monographs

  • Elston CW, Ellis IO, eds. Systemic Pathology: The Breast. 3rd edition, vol. 13. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli FA, ed. Pathology of the Breast. Stamford: Appleton-Lange; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli F, Devilee P, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Articles

  1. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 1996;77:2267–2274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott MA, Lagios MD, Axelsson K, Schnitt SJ, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: reproducibility of histologic subtype analysis. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:967–973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lagios MD, Margolin FR, Westdahl PR, et al. Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ: frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence. Cancer. 1989;63:618–624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yaziji H, Gown AM, Sneige N. Detection of stromal invasion in breast cancer: the myoepithelial markers. Adv Anat Pathol. 2000;7:100–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bratthauer GL, Moinfar F, Stamatakos MD, et al. Combined E-cadherin and high molecular weight cytokeratin immunoprofile differentiates lobular, ductal and hybrid mammary intraepithelial neoplasm. Hum Pathol. 2002; 33:620–627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellamy CO. Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Page DL, Lagios MD, Jensen RA. In situ carcinomas of the breast: ductal carcinoma in situ, Paget’s disease, lobular carcinoma in situ. In: Bland KI, Copeland III EM, eds. The breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Disorders. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004:255–304.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tavassoli FA. Lobular neoplasia. In: Tavassoli F, ed. Pathology of the Breast. Stamford: Appleton-Lange; 1999:373–397.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patey DH, Scarff RW. The position of histology in the prognosis of carcinoma of the breast. Lancet. 1928;1:801–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bloom HJG, Richardson WW. Histologic grading and prognosis in breast cancer: a study of 1709 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 1957;2:353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Assessment of histological grade. In: Elston CW, Ellis IO, eds. Systemic Pathology. The Breast. 3rd edition, vol. 13. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trihia H, Murray S, Price K, et al. Ki-67 expression in breast carcinoma: its association with grading systems, clinical parameters, and other prognostic factors—a surrogate marker? Cancer. 2003;97:1321–1331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tawfik OW, Fan F, Davis M, et al. A new semi-automated method of grading breast carcinoma based on a multivariant analysis of 527 cases. Mod Path. 2004;17:201.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer JS, Alvarez C, Milikowski C, et al. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod Path. 2005;18:1649–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kronenwett U, Huwendiek S, Ostring C, et al. Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2004;64:904–909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Niezabitowski A, Lackowska B, Rys J, et al. Prognostic evaluation of proliferative activity and DNA content in the phyllodes tumor of the breast: immunohistochemical and flow cytometric study of 118 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;65:77–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ward RM, Evans HL. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. A clinicopathologic study of 26 cases. Cancer. 1986;58:2282–2289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moffat CJ, Pinder SE, Dixon AR, et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a clinicopathological review of 32 cases. Histopathology. 1995;27:205–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fan, F., Thomas, P.A. (2007). Tumors of the Breast. In: Damjanov, I., Fan, F. (eds) Cancer Grading Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33750-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33751-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics