Abstract
The relationship between tumor morphology and the clinical behavior of tumors has been known for more than a century, and the study of such clinicopathologic correlations could be traced to the teachings of Rudolf Virchow and the scientific beginnings of microscopic pathology. From the historical point of view, however, the first attempts to correlate the microscopic features of tumors with their biology and clinical behavior traditionally are attributed to von Hansemann (1–3). In the 1890s, this German pathologist published his observations on anaplasia and abnormal mitotic figures and first suggested that the biologic and clinical behavior of tumors could be predicted from their microscopic characteristics. His pioneering publications on tumor cell atypia, anaplasia, and asymmetrical mitoses were summarized in a 1897 book, which was so popular that it reappeared 5 years later in a second edition (Figure 1-1). This book, based on meticulous microscopic study of tumors, contains drawings illustrating the author’s views of cancer (Figure 1-2).The clarity of these illustrations is fascinating even today.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
von Hansemann D. Ueber assymentrische Zellteilung in Epithelkrebsen und deren biologische Bedeutung. [Asymmetric cell division in epithelial cancer and its biological meaning.] Virchows Arch. 1890;119:299–326.
von Hansemann D. Ueber die Anaplasie des Geschwülstzellen und die asymetrische Mitose. [Anaplasia of tumor cells and asymmetric mitosis.] Virchows Arch. 1892;129:436–449.
von Hansemann D. Die mikroskopische Diagnose der bösartigen Geschwülste. [The microscopic diagnosis of malignant tumors.] Berlin: A. Hirschwald; 1897.
Broders AC. Squamous cell epithelioma of the lip: a study of 537 cases. JAMA. 1920;74:656–664.
Broders AC. Squamous cell epithelioma of the skin. Ann Surg. 1921;73:141–160.
Broders AC. Carcinoma: grading and practical applications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1926;2:376–381.
Greenhough RB. Varying degrees of malignancy in cancer of the breast. J Cancer Res. 1925;9:425–463.
Dukes CE. Histologic grading of cancer. Proc R Soc Med. 1937;30:371–376.
Henson DE. The histological grading of neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988;112:1091–1096.
Collan Y. General principles of grading lesions in diagnostic histopathology. Pathol Res Pract. 1989;185:539–543.
Humphrey PA. Prostate Pathology. Chicago: American Society of Pathology Press; 2003.
Carriaga MT, Henson DE. The histologic grading of cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:406–421.
Haagensen CD. The basis for histologic grading of carcinoma of the breast. Am J Cancer. 1933;1:285–327.
Cross SS. Grading and scoring in histopathology. Histopathology. 1998;33:99–106.
Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, et al. The 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228–1242.
Egevad L, Allsbrook WC Jr, Epstein JI. Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:5–9.
Meyer JS, Alvarez C, Milikowski C, et al. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1067–1078.
Kroger N, Milde-Langosch K, Riethdorf S, et al. Prognostic and predictive effects of immunohistochemical factors in high-risk primary breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:159–168.
Habuchi T, Marberger M, Droller MJ, et al. Prognostic markers for bladder cancer: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005;66(suppl 1):64–74.
Scott IS, Morris LS, Rushbrook SM, et al. Immunohistochemical estimation of cell cycle entry and phase distribution in astrocytomas: applications in diagnostic neuropathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2005;31:455–466.
Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Smith JS, McDermott MW. Techniques to assess the proliferative potential of brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2005;74:19–30.
Giordana MT, D’Agostino C, Pollo B, et al. Anaplasia is rare and does not influence prognosis in adult medulloblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005;64:869–874.
Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: the challenge of providing precise information in an imprecise world. Histopathology. 2006;48:42–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Damjanov, I. (2007). History and General Aspects of Tumor Grading. In: Damjanov, I., Fan, F. (eds) Cancer Grading Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33750-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33751-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)