Skip to main content

History and General Aspects of Tumor Grading

  • Chapter
Cancer Grading Manual

Abstract

The relationship between tumor morphology and the clinical behavior of tumors has been known for more than a century, and the study of such clinicopathologic correlations could be traced to the teachings of Rudolf Virchow and the scientific beginnings of microscopic pathology. From the historical point of view, however, the first attempts to correlate the microscopic features of tumors with their biology and clinical behavior traditionally are attributed to von Hansemann (1–3). In the 1890s, this German pathologist published his observations on anaplasia and abnormal mitotic figures and first suggested that the biologic and clinical behavior of tumors could be predicted from their microscopic characteristics. His pioneering publications on tumor cell atypia, anaplasia, and asymmetrical mitoses were summarized in a 1897 book, which was so popular that it reappeared 5 years later in a second edition (Figure 1-1). This book, based on meticulous microscopic study of tumors, contains drawings illustrating the author’s views of cancer (Figure 1-2).The clarity of these illustrations is fascinating even today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. von Hansemann D. Ueber assymentrische Zellteilung in Epithelkrebsen und deren biologische Bedeutung. [Asymmetric cell division in epithelial cancer and its biological meaning.] Virchows Arch. 1890;119:299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. von Hansemann D. Ueber die Anaplasie des Geschwülstzellen und die asymetrische Mitose. [Anaplasia of tumor cells and asymmetric mitosis.] Virchows Arch. 1892;129:436–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. von Hansemann D. Die mikroskopische Diagnose der bösartigen Geschwülste. [The microscopic diagnosis of malignant tumors.] Berlin: A. Hirschwald; 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broders AC. Squamous cell epithelioma of the lip: a study of 537 cases. JAMA. 1920;74:656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broders AC. Squamous cell epithelioma of the skin. Ann Surg. 1921;73:141–160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broders AC. Carcinoma: grading and practical applications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1926;2:376–381.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greenhough RB. Varying degrees of malignancy in cancer of the breast. J Cancer Res. 1925;9:425–463.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dukes CE. Histologic grading of cancer. Proc R Soc Med. 1937;30:371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henson DE. The histological grading of neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988;112:1091–1096.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Collan Y. General principles of grading lesions in diagnostic histopathology. Pathol Res Pract. 1989;185:539–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Humphrey PA. Prostate Pathology. Chicago: American Society of Pathology Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carriaga MT, Henson DE. The histologic grading of cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:406–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haagensen CD. The basis for histologic grading of carcinoma of the breast. Am J Cancer. 1933;1:285–327.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cross SS. Grading and scoring in histopathology. Histopathology. 1998;33:99–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, et al. The 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Egevad L, Allsbrook WC Jr, Epstein JI. Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer JS, Alvarez C, Milikowski C, et al. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1067–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroger N, Milde-Langosch K, Riethdorf S, et al. Prognostic and predictive effects of immunohistochemical factors in high-risk primary breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:159–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Habuchi T, Marberger M, Droller MJ, et al. Prognostic markers for bladder cancer: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005;66(suppl 1):64–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott IS, Morris LS, Rushbrook SM, et al. Immunohistochemical estimation of cell cycle entry and phase distribution in astrocytomas: applications in diagnostic neuropathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2005;31:455–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Smith JS, McDermott MW. Techniques to assess the proliferative potential of brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2005;74:19–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giordana MT, D’Agostino C, Pollo B, et al. Anaplasia is rare and does not influence prognosis in adult medulloblastoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005;64:869–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: the challenge of providing precise information in an imprecise world. Histopathology. 2006;48:42–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Damjanov, I. (2007). History and General Aspects of Tumor Grading. In: Damjanov, I., Fan, F. (eds) Cancer Grading Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33750-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33751-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics