Abstract
Results about persistence reported in this book lead to two main conclusions: firstly most of the patenting firms only patent for one year, afterwards they never or very sporadically patent; secondly, a few firms succeed in continuing to patent for long periods of time. Unfortunately patent data are not sufficient to understand in detail why some firms persist in innovation while others are absolutely non-innovative or only sporadic innovators. The purpose of this paper is to explore this question with qualitative data collected in two French surveys devoted to study innovation and the competences for innovation. More precisely we will address three questions: 1- What are the competences that explain entry into innovation? 2- What are the competences that explain persistence in innovation? 3- What are the differences between competences that promote entry and those that promote persistence? This chapter is structured into three parts. Firstly we briefly discuss the relevance of this questioning and we describe the organization of our empirical analysis. Secondly we present the French surveys on which the analysis is based and we report basic descriptive results. Thirdly we comment on the results obtained from different binary logit estimations in which competences are entered as explanatory variables of the probability of entry and persistence in innovation. In conclusion we discuss the scope and implications of the results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Audretsch, D. B. (1995), “Firm profitability, growth and innovation”, Review of Industrial Organization, no.10, pp.579–588.
Cefis, E. (2003), “Is there persistence in innovative activities?,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(4), April, pp.489–515
Cefis, E. (1999), “Persistence in profitability and in innovative activities”, European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, 7–9 June 1999, Grenoble, France.
Cefis, E. and Orsenigo, L. (2001), “The persistence of innovative activities: A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis”, Research Policy, 30(7), August, pp.1139–1158.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989), “Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D”, The Economic Journal, 99, September, pp.569–596.
Foray, D. and Mairesse, J. (1999), Innovations et Performances. Approches interdisciplinaires, édition des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris
François, J-P. (1998), “Les compétences pour innover,” Le 4 Pages, SESSI, no85, janvier
François, J-P. (1998), “Les compétences pour innover dans l’industrie,” Chiffres Clés Référence, SESSI
François, J-P., Goux, D., Guellec, D. and Templé, P. (1999), “Décrire les compétences pour l’innovation Une proposition d’enquête”, in Innovations et Performances. Approches Interdisciplinaires, ed. by Foray, D. and Mairesse, J., édition des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, pp.283–303
Leiponen, A. (1997), “Dynamic competences and firm performance”, IIASA, Interim Report n°IR-97-006/February
Leiponen, A. (2000), Competencies, Innovation and Profitability of Firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(1), pp.1–24
Malerba, F. (1992), “Learning by firms and incremental technical change”, The Economic Journal, vol.102, July, pp.845–859.
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1993), “Technological regimes and firm behavior”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(1), pp.45–71.
Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L. and Peretto, P. (1997), “Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), October, pp.801–826
Nelson, R. R. (1994), “The role of firm difference in an evolutionary theory of technical advance”, in Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics, ed. by Magnusson L., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA, pp.231–242.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, London
Waring, G. F. (1996), “Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns”, The American Economic Review, 86(5), December, pp.1253–1265.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cabagnols, A. (2006). Factors of Entry and Persistence In Innovation: A Competence Based Approach. In: Latham, W.R., Le Bas, C. (eds) The Economics of Persistent Innovation: An Evolutionary View. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 31. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29245-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29245-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28872-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29245-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)