Abstract
Given that persons starting new ventures often share ownership with one or more persons (Ruef, Aldrich, & Carter, 2003), determining the distribution of ownership among team members and how members contribute various sources to their startups has become more complicated. Teams are recognized as having larger pools of potential resources, including time, money, ideas, and social connections. For teams to be effective, members must synthesize their shared assets enough to compensate for the extra time and effort that coordination, delegation, and consensus making can take (Aubert & Kelsey, 2003; Erez & Somech, 1996; Faraj & Sproull, 2000). Startup teams differ from top management teams, classroom teams, and work teams because they are typically self-selected, self-directed, and composed of individuals sharing close relationships (such as kinship ties). Prior to the PSED I and PSED II, researchers had little empirical information regarding how startup team members activated their pooled resources to pursue business formation. Now that the two studies are publicly available, information on equity and contributions can be used to address at least four important concerns regarding startup processes in teams: access to resources, helpfulness (willingness to contribute), equality, and role differentiation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aram, J. D., & Morgan, C. P. (1976). The role of project team collaboration in R&D performance. Management Science, 22, 1127–1137.
Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 523–556.
Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1389–1397.
Bray, S. R. (2004). Collective efficacy, group goals, and group performance of a muscular endurance task. Small Group Research, 35, 230–238.
Bray, R. M., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33, 233–253.
Budig, M. J. (2006). Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family, and occupational class. Social Forces, 84, 2223–2239.
Caldwell, D. E., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (2003). The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations: The role of social influence. Small Group Research, 34, 497–517.
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., Eys, M. A., Bray, S., Dorsch, K., Estabrooks, P., et al. (2004). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs? An empirical analysis. Small Group Research, 34, 468–496.
Chansler, P. A., Swamidass, P. M., & Cammann, C. (2003). Self-managing work teams: An empirical study of group cohesiveness in “natural work groups” at a Harley-Davidson Motor Company Plant. Small Group Research, 34, 101–120.
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 55–79.
Davis, A. E. (2007). More (or less) than the sums of their parts? Status, teams, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Dhaliwal, S. (2000). Entrepreneurship—a learning process: The experience of Asian female entrepreneurs and women in business. Education and Training, 48, 445–452.
Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275–295.
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685–716.
English, A., Griffith, R. L., & Steelman, L. A. (2004). Team performance: The effect of team conscientiousness and task type. Small Group Research, 35, 643–665.
Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996). Is group productivity loss the rule or the exception? Effects of culture and group-based motivation. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1513–1537.
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568.
Foo, M. D., Sin, H., & Yiong, L. (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on new venture team effectiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 389–399.
Foo, M. D., Wong, P. K., & Ong, A. (2005). Research note: Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges’ evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 385–402.
Halfhill, T., Sundrstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36, 83–105.
Hurley, A. (1999). Incorporating feminist theories into sociological theories of entrepreneurship. Women in Management Review, 14(2) 54–62.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intergroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
Kim, P. H., Longest, K. C., & Aldrich, H. E. (2008, August). Can you lend me a hand? Social support, network structure, and entrepreneurial action. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston.
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks, 24, 407–422.
Olivera, F., & Straus, S. G. (2004). Group-to-individual transfer of learning: Cognitive and social factors. Small Group Research, 35, 440–465.
Reynolds, P. D., & Curtin, R. T. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II: Initial assessment. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 155–307.
Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80, 123–158.
Ruef, M. (2003). Norms of group-generalized exchange in formal organizations. Unpublished manuscript.
Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68, 195–222.
Shaver, K. G. (2006). Cleaning of ERC data from ISR web site. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.cofc.edu/%7Eshaverk/kscleans06.sps.
Shepherd, D. A., & Krueger, N. F. (2002). An intentions-based model of entrepreneurial teams’ social cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 167–185.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P, Jr., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.
Talaulicar, T., Grundei, J., & Werder, A. V. (2005). Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team orientation and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 519–541.
Van Der Vet, G. S., Bunderson, J. S., & Oosterhof, A. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 877–893.
Whiteoak, J. W., Chalip, L., & Hort, L. K. (2004). Assessing group efficacy: Comparing three methods of measurement. Small Group Research, 35, 158–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, A.E., Longest, K.C., Kim, P.H., Aldrich, H.E. (2009). Owner Contributions and Equity. In: Curtin, R., Reynolds, P. (eds) New Firm Creation in the United States. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 23. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09523-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09523-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09522-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09523-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)