Skip to main content

Nonablative and Minimally Ablative Resurfacing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1475 Accesses

Abstract

Skin damage, resulting from surgery, trauma, acne scarring, or excessive skin exposure, often prompts patients to seek medical advice. Nowadays, even expected signs of aging, such as rhytides and “age spots,” can be distressing enough to lead patients to inquire about treatment. Traditional treatment modalities include the use of topical retinoids, bleaching agents, chemical peels, microdermabrasion, and lasers. With the recent advances in technology, lasers and light sources have now become the technique of choice for skin resurfacing. Conventional lasers, like the carbon dioxide (CO2) or erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG), are ablative and thus remove the entire epidermis and portions of the dermis during treatment. Consequently, results are impressive, but there is a great degree of associated postoperative ­morbidity. Patients are often advised to expect 1–2 weeks of “downtime” in order to recover from the swelling, oozing, crusting, and discomfort that results from the procedure [1] (V/B).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeHoratius DM, Dover JS. Nonablative tissue remodeling and photorejuvenation. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Non-ablative/light-based treatment information. http://www.asds.net/NonAblativeLightBasedTreatmentInformation.aspx. Accessed 22 Sept 2008.

  3. Alexiades-Armentakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):719–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Technology report: LED photorejuvenation. http://www.asds.net/TechnologyReportLEDRejuvenation.aspx. Accessed 22 Sept 2008.

  5. Technology report: fractional photothermolysis. http://www.asds.net/fractional_photothermolysis.aspx. Accessed 22 Sept 2008.

  6. Trelles MA, Allones I, Levy JL, et al. Combined nonablative skin rejuvenation with the 595- and 1450-nm lasers. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1292–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilmer S, Semchyshyn N, Shah G, Fitzpatrick R. A pilot study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait PSR3) in the full facial rejuvenation procedures. Lasers Med Sci. 2007;22:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology in low-energy full-facial rejuvenation. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(2):168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alam M, Dover JS. Nonablative laser and light therapy: an approach to patient and device selection. Skin Therapy Lett. 2003;8(4):4–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanzi EL, Williams CM, Alster TS. Treatment of facial rhytides with a nonablative 1,450-nm diode laser: a controlled clinical and histological study. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berlin AL, Hussain M, Goldberg DJ. Cutaneous photoaging treated with a combined 595/1064 nm laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9:214–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan HHL, Lam L, Wong DYS, et al. Use of 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser for wrinkle reduction and the treatment of atrophic acne scarring in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bitter PH. Non-invasive rejuvenation of photodamaged skin using serial, full face intense pulsed light treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:835–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadick NS, Weiss R, Kilmer S, Bitter P. Photoreju­venation with intense pulsed light: results of a multi-center study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2004;3(1):41–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jorgensen GF, Hedelund L, Haedersdal M. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40:293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Negishi K, Kushikata N, Takeuchi K, et al. Photorejuvenation by intense pulsed light with objective measurement of skin color in Japanese patients. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:1380–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ang P, Barlow RJ. Nonablative laser resurfacing: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002;27:630–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg DJ, Whitworth J. Laser skin resurfacing with the Q-switched Nd:AYG laser. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:903–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cisneros JL, Rio R, Palou J. The Q-switched neodymium (Nd):YAG laser with quadruple frequency. Clinical histological evaluation of facial resurfacing using different wavelengths. Dermatol Surg. 1998;23:345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg DJ, Metzler C. Skin resurfacing utilizing a low fluence Nd:YAG laser. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1:23–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lipper GM, Perez M. Nonablative acne scare reduction after a series of treatments with a short-pulsed 1,064-nm neodymium:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:998–1006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatia AC, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Stewart B, Alam M. Patient satisfaction and reported long-term therapeutic efficacy associated with 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of acne scarring and photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:346–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy JL, Trelles M, Lagarde JM, Mordon S. Treatment of wrinkles with the nonablative 1,320-nm Nd:YAG laser. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47(5):482–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yaghmai D, Garden JM, Bakus AD, et al. Comparison of a 1,064 nm laser and a 1,320 nm laser for the nonablative treatment of acne scars. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:903–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross EV, Sajben FP, Hsia J, et al. Non ablative skin remodeling: selective dermal heating with mid-infrared laser and contact cooling combination. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26:186–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah G, Kilmer S. Combined nonablative rejuvenation techniques. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1206–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Comparison of a 1450-nm diode laser and a 1320-nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of atrophic facial scars: a prospective clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fournier N, Dean S, Barneon G, et al. Non ablative remodeling: clinical, histologic, ultrasound imaging and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:glass laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bogle MA, Dover JS, et al. Evaluation of the 1,540-nm erbium:glass laser in the treatment of inflammatory facial acne. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:810–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, et al. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rahman Z, Alam M, Dover JS. Fractional laser treatment for pigmentation and texture improvement. Skin Therapy Lett. 2006;11(9):7–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wanner M, Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Fractional photothermolysis: treatment of facial and nonfacial cutaneous photodamage with a 1,550-nm erbium-doped fiber laser. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kono T, Chan HH, Groff WF, et al. Prospective direct comparison study of fractional resurfacing using different fluences and densities for skin rejuvenation in Asians. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:311–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McDaniel DH, Newman J, Geronemus R, et al. ­Non-ablative non-thermal LED photomodulation – a ­multicenter clinical photoaging trial. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;15:22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weiss RA, McDaniel GH, Geronemus R, Weiss MA. Clinical trial of a novel non-thermal LED array for reversal of photoaging: clinical, histologic, and surface profilometric results. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Russel BA, Kellet N, Reilley LR. A study to determine the efficacy of combination LED light therapy (633 nm and 830 nm) in facial skin rejuvenation. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7:196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alster TS, Konda S. Plasma skin resurfacing for regeneration of neck, chest and hands: investigation of a novel device. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(11):1315–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Foster KW, Moy RL, Fincher EF. Advances in plasma skin rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(3):169–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hedelund L, Due E, Bjerring P, et al. Skin rejuvenation using intense pulsed light: a randomized controlled split-face trial with blinded response evaluation. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:985–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhat J, Birch J, Whitehurst C, et al. A single-blinded randomized controlled study to determine the efficacy of Omnilux Revive facial treatment in skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci. 2005;20:6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Alster TS, Lupton JR. Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Galeckas KJ, Collins M, Ross EV, Uebelhoer NS. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:672–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: rhytid improvement by nonablative dermal remodeling. J Cutan Laser Ther. 2000;2:157–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hohenleutner S, Koellner K, Lorenz S, et al. Results of nonablative wrinkle reduction with a 1,450-nm diode laser: difficulties in the assessment of “subtle changes”. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37:14–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kligman DE, Zhen Y. Intense pulsed light treatment of photoaged facial skin. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1085–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lapidoth M, Odo MEY, Odo LM. Novel use of erbium:YAG (2940-nm) laser for fractional ablative photothermolysis in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:1048–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lask G, Fournier N, Trelles M, et al. The utilization of nonthermal blue (405–425 nm) and near infrared (850-890 nm) light in aesthetic dermatology and surgery – a multicenter study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee SY, Park KH, Choi JW, et al. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: clinical, probiometric, histologic, ultrastructural, and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settings. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;88:51–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sadick NS, Trelles MA. Nonablative wrinkle treatment of the face and neck using a combined diode laser and radiofrequency technology. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1695–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shraddha Desai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Desai, S., Bhatia, A.C. (2012). Nonablative and Minimally Ablative Resurfacing. In: Alam, M. (eds) Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09423-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09424-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics