Skip to main content

L’artroprotesi di ginocchio con tecnica computer-assistita

  • Chapter
  • 481 Accesses

Estratto

Negli ultimi anni si sta assistendo allo sviluppo di nuove tecnologie finalizzate a migliorare le tradizionali tecniche chirurgiche ortopediche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW (2002) Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:698–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B et al (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop (354):49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1997) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ecker ML, Lotcker PA, Windsor RE (1987) Long term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty: significance of radiolucent line. Clin Orthop (216):151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng EL, Stulberg SD, Wixon RL (1994) Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in TKRs with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop (229):60–71

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garg A, Walzer PS (1990) Prediction of total knee motion using a three dimensional computer graphics model. J Biomech 23:45–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffery RS, Morris SW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:709–714

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laskin RS (1990) Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:529–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewound H (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Piazza SJ, Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Stem SH (1998) Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral roll-back in posterior substituting knee replacement. J Orthop Res 16:264–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Post operative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop (299):153–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM (1994) Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in the total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stern SH, Insall JN (1992) Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of 9–12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:980–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasiliewsky RC, Galante JO, Leigthy R et al (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved poly-ethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (299):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berger RA, Rubasi HE, Seel MJ et al (1993) Determining the rotation alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondilar axis. Clin Orthop (286):40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friggie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG et al (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patient with posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  17. Towney CD (1985) The anatomic total knee: instrumentation and alignment technique. The Knee. Papers of the first scientific meeting of the Knee Society. University Press, Baltimore, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  18. DiGioia AM, Jamaraz B, Colgan BD (1998) Computer assisted orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop (354):8–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart L et al (2004) Radiological results of image based and non image based computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart L et al (2004) Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 75:464–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla D et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Confalonieri N, Cerea P, Motavalli K, Manzotti A (2002) Cos’è la navigazione: tre anni di esperienza con sistemi di ricostruzione virtuale intraoperatoria nella protesizzazione del ginocchio. GIOT 28[Suppl 1]:S74–86

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mielke RK, Clemes U, Jens JH, Kershally S (2001) Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation: preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation tecnique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C (2001) Computer assisted knee arthroplasty; comparison with conventional procedures. Results of 50 cases in prospective ran-domised study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:18–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jenny JY, Miele RK, Kohler S et al (2003) Total knee prosthesis implantation with a non image-based navigation system — a multicentric analysis. 70th Annual Meeting AAOS

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:645–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27:366–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart L et al (2003) Useability of an image based navigation system in reconstruction of leg alignment in total knee arthroplasty — results of a prospective study. Biomed Tech 48:339–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perlick L, Bathis H, Lerch K et al (2004) Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique. Z Rheumatol 63:140–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M (2004) Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop (428):131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berry DJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty is better than a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perlick L, Bathis H, Perlick C et al (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of intraoperative measurement of the transepicondilar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment based on the anterior-posterior axis in total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee: a technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondilar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR et al (2000) Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:354–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y (1998) Reliability of the anterior-posterior axis and the posterior condilar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 3:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R et al (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (426):180–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingard M et al (2004) Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pace, N., Chiusaroli, M., Di Matteo, R. (2005). L’artroprotesi di ginocchio con tecnica computer-assistita. In: La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0315-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0379-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics