Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Topics in Anaesthesia and Critical Care ((TIACC))

  • 971 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, NNIS (1999) Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care in USA. Crit Care Med 27:887–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shing-Naz N, Sprague BM, Patel KM, Pollack MM (2000) Risk assessment and standardized nosocomial infection rate in critically ill children. Crit Care Med 28:2069–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pearson ML (1996) Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. I. Intravascular device-related infections: an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 24:262–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Calil R, Marba ST, von Nowakonski A, Tresoldi AT (2001) Reduction in colonization and nosocomial infection by multiresistant bacteria in a neonatal unit after institution of educational measures and restriction in the use of cephalosporins. Am J Infect Control 29:133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemmen SW, Zolldann D, Gastmeier P, Lutticken R (2001) Implementing and evaluating a rotating surveillance system and infection control guidelines in 4 intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 29:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson EL, Aiello AE, Bastyr J et al (2001) Assessment of two hand hygiene regimens for intensive care unit personnel. Crit Care Med 29:944–951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Warren DK, Fraser VJ (2001) Infection control measures to limit antimicrobial resistance. Crit Care Med 29[Suppl]:N128–N134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschmann H, Fux L, Podusel J (2001) The influence of hand hygiene prior to insertion of peripheral venous catheters on the frequency of complications. J Hosp Infect 49:199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maas A, Flament P, Pardou A et al (1998) Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in critically ill neonates: risk factors and impact of a prevention programme. J Hosp Infect 40:211–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Slota M, Green M, Farley A et al (2001) The role of gown and glove isolation and strict handwashing in the reduction of nosocomial infection in children with solid organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 29:405–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Humar A, Ostromecki A, Direnfeld J et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection. Clin Infect Dis 31:1001–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S (2002) Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 136:792–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Little K, Palmer D (1998) Central line exit sites: which dressing? Nurs Stand 12:42–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikoletti S, Leslie G, Gandossi S et al (1999) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters. Am J Infect Control 27:488–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Leary M, Bihari D (1998) Central venous catheters. Time for a change? BMJ 316:1918–1919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P et al (1997) Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 25:1417–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahieu LM, De Dooy JJ, Lenaerts AE et al (2001) Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients. J Hosp Infect 48:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraenkel DJ, Rickard C, Lipman J (2000) Can we achieve consensus on central venous catheter-related infections? Anaesth Intensive Care 28:475–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ljungman P, Hagglund H, Bjorkstrand B et al (1997) Peroperative teicoplanin for prevention of gram-positive infections in neutropenic patients with indwelling central venous catheters: a randomized, controlled study. Support Care Cancer 5:485–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raad II, Hachem RY, Abi-Said D et al (1998) A prospective crossover randomized trial of novobiocin and rifampin prophylaxis for the prevention of intravascular catheter infections in cancer patients treated with interleukin-2. Cancer 82:403–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goetz AM, Miller J, Wagener MM, Muder RR (1998) Complications related to intravenous midline catheter usage. A 2-year study. Intraven Nurs 21:76–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Soifer NE, Borzak S, Edlin BR, Weinstein RA (1998) Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 158:473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McLane C, Morris L, Holm K (1998) A comparison of intravascular pressure monitoring system contamination and patient bacteremia with use of 48-and 72-hour system ghange intervals. Heart Lung 27:200–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma TY, Yoshinaka R, Banaag A et al (1998) Total parenteral nutrition via multilumen catheters does not increase the risk of catheter-related sepsis: a randomized, prospective study. Clin Infect Dis 27:500–503

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mermel LA (2000) Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 132:391–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bach A, Eberhardt H, Frick A et al (1999) Efficacy of silver-coating central venous catheters in reducing bacterial colonization. Crit Care Med 27:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boswald M, Lugauer S, Regenfus A et al (1999) Reduced rates of catheter-associated infection by use of a new silver-impregnated central venous catheter. Infection 27[Suppl]:S56–S60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA (1997) Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 127:257–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. George SJ, Vuddamalay P, Boscoe MJ (1997) Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization and associated infection in immunocompromised transplant patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 14:428–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tennenberg S, Lieser M, McCurdy B et al (1997) A prospective randomized trial of an antibiotic-and antiseptic-coated central venous catheter in the prevention of catheter-related infections. Arch Surg 132:1348–1351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heard SO, Wagle M, Vijayakumar E et al (1998) Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Arch Intern Med 158:81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Collin GR (1999) Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Chest 115:1632–1640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hannan M, Juste RN, Umasanker S et al (1999) Antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation. Anaesthesia 54:868–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheng WH, Ko WJ, Wang JT et al (2000) Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 38:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaeger K, Osthaus A, Heine J et al (2001) Efficacy of a benzalkonium chloride-impregnated central venous catheter to prevent catheter-associated infection in cancer patients. Chemotherapy 47:50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J et al (1997) Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial. The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group. Ann Intern Med 127:267–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Darouiche RO, Raad II, Heard SO et al (1999) A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. N Engl J Med 340:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bach A (1999) Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. N Engl J Med 340:1761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pierce CM, Wade A, Mok Q (2000) Heparin-bonded central venous lines reduce thrombotic and infective complications in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 26:967–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C et al (1999) Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 130:729–733

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F et al (2001) Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 286:700–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen Y, Fosse JP, Karoubi P et al (1998) The “hands-off” catheter and the prevention of systemic infections associated with pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:284–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cook D (2000) Ventilator associated pneumonia: perspectives on the burden of illness. Intensive Care Med 26[Suppl 1]:S31–S37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Day T, Wainwright SP, Wilson-Barnett J (2001) An evaluation of a teaching intervention to improve the practice of endotracheal suctioning in intensive care units. J Clin Nurs 10:682–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW et al (1985) The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 121:182–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Josephson A, Karanfil L, Alonso H et al (1991) Risk-specific nosocomial infection rates. Am J Med 91[Suppl 3B]:131S–137S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Combes P, Fauvage B, Oleyer C (2000) Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a prospective randomised evaluation of the Stericath closed suctioning system. Intensive Care Med 26:878–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Fraser VJ et al (1995) Mechanical ventilation with or without 7-day circuit changes. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 123:168–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Favero MS (1989) Principles of sterilization and disinfection. Anesth Clin N Am 7:941–949

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rathgeber J, Kietzmann D, Mergeryan H et al (1997) Prevention of patient bacterial contamination of anaesthesia-circle-systems: a clinical study of the contamination risk and performance of different heat and moisture exchangers with electret filter (HMEF). Eur J Anaesthesiol 14:368–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Boots RJ, Howe S, George N et al (1997) Clinical utility of hygroscopic heat and moisture exchangers in intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 25:1707–1701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Memish ZA, Oni GA, Djazmati W et al (2001) A randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of a heat and moisture exchanger with a heated humidifying system on the occurrence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Infect Control 29:301–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kirton OC, DeHaven B, Morgan J et al (1997) A prospective, randomized comparison of an in-line heat moisture exchange filter and heated wire humidifiers: rates of ventilator-associated early-onset (community-acquired) or late-onset (hospital-acquired) pneumonia and incidence of endotracheal tube occlusion. Chest 112:1055–1059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Davis K Jr, Evans SL, Campbell RS et al (2000) Prolonged use of heat and moisture exchangers does not affect device efficiency or frequency rate of nosocomial pneumonia. Crit Care Med 28:1412–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Blunt MC, Young PJ, Patil A, Haddock A (2001) Gel lubrication of the tracheal tube cuff reduces pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology 95:377–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH et al (1998) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42:545–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Garibaldi RA (1993) Hospital acquired UTI. In: Wenzel RP (ed) Prevention and control: nosocomial infections, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 600–610

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson C, Sandhu SS, Kaisary AV (1997) A prospective randomized study comparing a catheter-valve with a standard drainage system. Br J Urol 80:915–917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Karchmer TB, Giannetta ET, Muto CA et al (2000) A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 160:3294–3298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Darouiche RO, Smith JA Jr, Hanna H et al (1999) Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated bladder catheters in reducing catheter-associated bacteriuria: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Urology 54:976–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Gaudio, A., Di Filippo, A. (2005). Device Policies. In: van Saene, H.K.F., De La Cal, M.A., Silvestri, L. (eds) Infection Control in the Intensive Care Unit. Topics in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. Springer, Milano . https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0361-X_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0361-X_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0185-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0361-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics