Skip to main content

Effects of Wastewater Treatment Plants on Stream Nutrient Dynamics Under Water Scarcity Conditions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 8))

Abstract

Despite an array of significant technological advances, effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) generate abrupt physical and chemical discontinuities along the fluvial continuum. These discontinuities not only alter the water quality, but also significantly affect fluvial ecosystem structure and function. In particular, WWTP effluents increase nutrient concentrations and introduce toxic substances, including emergent pollutants, to the fluvial ecosystems. There is abundant evidence that these changes affect stream communities. Fewer studies, however, have examined the influence of WWTP inputs on the hydrologic and nutrient availability regimes. Yet, shifts in these regimes can have clear implications for the stream ecosystem function. This knowledge is of critical relevance for stream management as it provides insights on integrative properties of trophic state, energy transfer, and material cycling at the ecosystem level. WWTP effects on fluvial ecosystems are expected to become more exacerbated under water scarcity conditions, which are characteristic of arid and semiarid regions such as the Mediterranean region. Under these conditions, streams receiving point source inputs may turn into islands of permanent flow within a highly intermittent fluvial network. This has implications not only locally at the reach scale but also at the catchment scale. Within this context, both plant operation and fluvial management may be critical to preserve the ecological integrity of these aquatic ecosystems at the same time that a balance is met with societal demand for high quality water resources. This chapter aims to review current knowledge on this topic, with major emphasis on nutrient loads and in-stream nutrient retention, and to discuss its implications within the context of actual and future scenarios of water scarcity conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hynes HBN (1969) The enrichment of streams. Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA, pp 188–196

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith VH, Schindler DW (2009) Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol 24:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meybeck M (1982) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transport by World Rivers. Am J Sci 282:401–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Scavia D (2002) Beyond Science into Policy: Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and the Mississippi River. BioScience 52:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EEA- European Environmental Agency (2000) Nutrients in European ecosystems. Environmental Assessment report No 4. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ENVIASSRP04 (June 2009)

  7. Carey RO, Migliaccio KW (2009) Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manage. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Taylor SL (2004) The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environ Manage 34:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP II (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. United Nations Population Division, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grimm NB, Foster D, Groffman P, Grove JM, Hopkinson CS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Pataki DE (2008) Peters DPC (2008b) The changing landscape: ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients. Front Ecol Environ 6:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:602–612

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wenger SJ, Roy AH, Jackson CR, Bernhardt ES, Carter TL, Filoso S, Gibson CA, Hession WC, Kaushal SS, Martí E, Meyer JL, Palmer MA, Paul MJ, Purcell AH, Ramirez A, Rosemond AD, Schofield KA, Sudduth EB, Walsh CJ (2009) Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:1080–1098

    Google Scholar 

  16. EEA- European Environmental Agency (2009a) Assessment on Urban Waste Water Treatment Indicators, ref: CSI 024. Available at http://themes.eea.europa.eu/IMS/ISpecs/ISpecification20041007132045/IAssessment1196343193294/view_content (June 2009)

  17. EEA- European Environmental Agency (2005) Source apportionment of nitrogen and phosphorus inputs into the aquatic environment. Environmental Assessment report No 7. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2005_7 (June 2009)

  18. EEA- European Environmental Agency (2009b) Assessment on nutrients in freshwaters, ref CSI 020. Available at http://themes.eea.europa.eu/IMS/ISpecs/ISpecification20041007131957/IAssessment1202382187208/view_content (June 2009)

  19. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martinot E, Junfeng L (2007) Powering china’s development: the role of renewable energy. World Watch Institute Report (ISBN 13: 978-1-878071-83-5)

    Google Scholar 

  21. WHO/UNICEF (2008) Progress in drinking-water and sanitation: special focus on sanitation. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation update report. Available at: http://www.wssinfo.org/en/40_MDG2008.html (June 2009)

  22. United Nations (2007) Population connected to wastewater treatment plants. United Nations Statistics Division, Environmental Indicators, Wastewater. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/ENVIRONMENT/wastewater.htm (June 2009)

  23. Constanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van deen Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron JS, Poff NL, Angermeier PL, Dahm CN, Gleick PH, Hairston NG Jr, Jackson RB, Johnston CA, Richter BD, Steinman AD (2002) Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecol Appl 12:1247–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grimm NB, Sheibley RW, Crenshaw CL, Dahm CN, Roach WJ, Zeglin LH (2005) N retention and transformation in urban streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:626–642

    Google Scholar 

  26. von Schiller D, Martí E, Riera JL, Mibot M, Marks JC, Sabater F (2008) Influence of land use on stream ecosystem function in a mediterranean catchment. Freshw Biol 53:2600–2612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecolologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gasith A, Resh VH (1999) Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:51–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dodds WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martí E, Aumatell J, Godé L, Poch M, Sabater F (2004) Nutrient retention efficiency in streams receiving inputs from wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Qual 33:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brooks BW, Riley TM, Taylor RD (2006) Water quality of effluent-dominated ecosystems: ecotoxicological, hydrological, and management considerations. Hydrobiologia 556:365–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liquete C, Canals M, Ludwig W, Arnau P (2009) Sediment discharge of the rivers of Catalonia, NE Spain, and the influence of human impacts. J Hydrol 366:76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Malmqvist B, Rundle S (2002) Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29:134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gibson CA, Meyer JL, Poff NL, Hayc LE, Georgakakos A (2005) Flow regime alterations under changing climate in two river basins: implications for freshwater ecosystems. River Res Appl 21:849–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brissaud F (2009) Technologies for water regeneration and integrated management of water resources. In: Sabater S, Barceló D (eds) Water scarcity in the Mediterranean area. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Henze M, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (2008) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling and design. IWA Publishing (ISBN: 9781843391883), pp 528

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cervantes FJ (2009) Environmental technologies to treat nitrogen pollution. Water Intelligence Online © IWA Publishing 2009 (ISSN Online: 1476-1777)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Demars BOL, Harper DM, Pitt JA, Slaughter R (2005) Impact of phosphorus control measures on in-river phosphorus retention associated with point source pollution. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:43–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ekka SA, Haggard BE, Matlock MD, Chaubey I (2006) Dissolved phosphorus concentrations and sediment interactions in effluent dominated Ozark streams. Ecol Eng 26:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oelsner GP, Brooks PD, Hogan JF (2007) Nitrogen sources and sinks within the Middle Rio Grande, New Mexico. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:850–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Withers PJA, Jarvie HP (2008) Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: a review. Sci Total Environ 400:379–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hur J, Schlautman MA, Karanfil T, Smink J, Song H, Klaine SJ, Hayes JC (2007) Influence of drought and municipal sewage effluents on the baseflow water chemistry of an upper Piedmont River. Environ Monit Assess 132:171–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Merseburger GC (2006) Nutrient dynamics and metabolism in Mediterranean streams affected by nutrient inputs from human activities. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona (Spain)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tolosana R (2005) Geostatistics for constrained variables: positive data, compositions and probabilities. Application to environmental hazard monitoring. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Girona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  47. Merseburger GC, Martí E, Sabater F (2005) Net changes in nutrient concentrations below a point source input in two streams draining catchments with contrasting land uses. Sci Total Environ 347:217–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ensign SH, Doyle MW (2006) Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks. J Geophys Res 111:G04009. doi: 10.1029/2005JG000114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Butturini A, Sabater F (1998) Ammonium and phosphate retention in a Mediterranean stream: hydrological versus temperature control. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1938–1945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Peterson BJ, Wollheim WM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Martí E, Bowden WB, Valett HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WH, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory SV, Morral DD (2001) Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Dodds WK, López AJ, Bowden WB, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Hamilton SK, Hershey AE, Martí E, McDowell WH, Meyer JL, Morrall D, Mulholland PJ, Peterson BJ, Tank JL, Valett HM, Webster JR, Wollheim WM (2002) N uptake as a function of concentration in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:206–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Newbold JD, Bott TL, Kaplan LA, Dow CL, Jackson JK, Aufdenkampe AK, Martin LA, Van Horn DJ, de Long AA (2006) Uptake of nutrients and organic C in streams in New York City drinking-water-supply watersheds. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:998–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mulholland PJ, Helton AM, Poole GC, Hall RO Jr, Hamilton SK, Peterson BJ, Tank JL, Ashkenas LR, Cooper LW, Dahm CN, Dodds WK, Findlay SEG, Gregory SV, Grimm NB, Johnson SL, McDowell WH, Meyer JL, Valett HM, Webster JR, Arango CP, Beaulieu JJ, Bernot MJ, Burgin AJ, Crenshaw CL, Johnson LT, Niederlehner BR, O’Brien JM, Potter JD, Sheibley RW, Sobota DJ, Thomas SM (2008) Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrogen loading. Nature 452:202–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gücker B, Brauns M, Pusch M (2006) Effects of wastewater treatment plant discharge on ecosystem structure and function of lowland streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ruggiero A, Solimini AG, Carchini G (2006) Effects of a waste water treatment plant on organic matter dynamics and ecosystem functioning in a Mediterranean stream. Annales de Limnologie 42:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Webster JR, Patten BC (1979) Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. Ecol Monogr 49:51–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Newbold JD, Elwood JW, O’Neill RV, van Winkle W (1981) Measuring nutrient spiralling in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:860–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Webster JR, Valett HM (2006) Solute dynamics. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vandenberg JA, Ryan MC, Nuell DD, Chu A (2005) Field evaluation of mixing length and attenuation of nutrients and fecal coliform in a wastewater effluent plume. Environ Monit Assess 107:45–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gibson CA, Meyer JL (2007) Nutrient uptake in a large urban river. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:576–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Haggard BE, Stanley EH, Storm DE (2005) Nutrient retention in a point-source-enriched stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Brion N, Billen G (2000) Wastewater as a source of nitrifying bacteria in river systems: the case of the River Seine downstream from Paris. Water Res 34:3213–3221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Camargo JA, Alonso A (2006) Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 32:831–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lofton DD, Hershey AE, Whalen SC (2007) Evaluation of denitrification in an urban stream receiving wastewater effluent. Biogeochemistry 86:77–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Andersen CB, Lewis GP, Sargent KA, Sarkar D (2004) Influence of wastewater-treatment effluent on concentrations and fluxes of solutes in the Bush River, South Carolina, during extreme drought conditions. Environ Geosci 11:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  66. Haggard BE, Storm DE, Stanley EH (2001) Effect of a point source input on stream nutrient retention. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:1291–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. House WA, Denison FH (1998) Phosphorus dynamics in a lowland river. Water Res 32:1819–1839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Poole GC (2002) Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshw Biol 47:641–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB (2004) Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85:2369–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Stanley EH, Fisher SG, Grimm NB (1997) Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. BioScience 47:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Butturini A, Bernal S, Sabater S, Sabater F (2002) The influence of riparian-hyporheic zone on the hydrological responses in an intermittent stream. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lake PS (2003) Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Biol 48:1161–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hynes HBN (1975) The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  74. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Global Planet Change 63:90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Calbó J (2009) Possible climate change scenarios with specific reference to Mediterranean regions. In: Sabater S, Barceló D (eds) Water scarcity in the Mediterranean area. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  76. Caille F, Riera JL, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Middelkoop H, Rosell-Melé A (2007) Participatory scenario development for integrated assessment of nutrient flows in a Catalan river catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 4:1265–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Nilsson C, Renöfält BM (2008) Linking flow regime and water quality in rivers: a challenge to adaptive catchment management. Ecol Soc 13(2):18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art18/

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sala L, Serra M (2004) Towards sustainability in water recycling. Water Sci Technol 50:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Roach WJ, Grimm NB (2009) Nutrient variation in an urban lake chain and its consequences for phytoplankton production. J Environ Qual 38:1429–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Dillon P (2005) Future management of aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol J 13:313–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Pimm SL (1996) Designer ecosystems. Nature 379:217–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Pargament D, Henkin E, Gasith A (2005) Integrated watershed management: the Yarqon river authority as a model. Options Méditerranéennes. Série A: Séminaires Méditerranéens (CIHEAM) 65:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  83. Pargament D, Laster R, Livney D (2009) The Public’s role as a Stakeholder in the Yarqon River Authority, Israel. In: Berry KA, Mollard E (eds) Social participation in water governance and management. Critical and global perspectives. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dor I, Schechter H, Shuval HI (1976) Biological and chemical succession in Nahal Soreq: a free-flowing wastewater stream. J Appl Ecol 13:475–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Lewis DB, Grimm NB (2007) Hierarchical regulation of nitrogen export from urban catchments: interactions of storms and landscapes. Ecol Appl 17:2347–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Thomas SM, Hopkinson CH, Vörösmarty CJ (2008) Dynamics of N removal over annual time periods in a suburban river network. J Geophys Res 113:G03038. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Caille F (2009) Integrated environmental assessment of nutrient emissions in a mediterranean catchment: a case study in La Tordera, Catalonia. Ph.D. Thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  88. Gücker B, Pusch M (2006) Regulation of nutrient uptake in eutrophic lowland streams. Limnol Oceanogr 51:1443–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Reddy KR, Flaig E, Scinto LJ, Diaz O, Debusk TA (1996) Phosphorus assimilation in a stream system of the Lake Okeechobee. J Am Water Resour Assoc 32:901–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Wesolowski EA (1999) Simulation of effects of wastewater discharges on Sand Creek and lower Caddo Creek near Ardmore, Oklahoma. Investigations Report 99-4022. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kim K, Lee JS, Oh CW, Hwang GS, Kim J, Yeo S, Kim Y, Park S (2002) Inorganic chemicals in an effluent-dominated stream as indicators for chemical reactions and streamflows. J Hydrol 264:147–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugènia Martí .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martí, E., Riera, J.L., Sabater, F. (2009). Effects of Wastewater Treatment Plants on Stream Nutrient Dynamics Under Water Scarcity Conditions. In: Sabater, S., Barceló, D. (eds) Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry(), vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2009_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics