Skip to main content

The Use of Surgical Care Improvement Projects in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially mortal complication in patients undergoing surgery. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism can be seen up to 40 % of patients who have no or inappropriate VTE prophylaxis during perioperative period.

In addition to the preoperative and intraoperative preventive measures, the standardization of postoperative care and follow-up are essential to reduce VTE risk. Modern healthcare prioritizes patient’s safety and aims to reduce postoperative morbidity by using standardized protocols. Use of quality improvement projects with well-organized surgical care has an important role to prevent VTE during hospital stay. Present surgical care improvement projects have provided us the opportunity to identify patients who are vulnerable to VTE. Description and introduction of the quality standards for VTE prevention in the educational materials, meetings and at the medical schools will increase the VTE awareness among the health care providers. You are going to find the characteristics of the major surgical quality improvement projects and their relations with VTE in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133(6 Suppl):S381–S453

    Google Scholar 

  2. Millan M, Hull TL, Hammel J et al (2007) Portal vein thrombi after restorative proctocolectomy: serious complication without long-term sequelae. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1540–1544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro R, Vogel JD, Kiran RP (2011) Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: an additional benefit of the minimally invasive approach? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1496–1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prandoni P, Samama MM (2008) Risk stratification and venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and cancer patients. Br J Haematol 141:587–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muntz JE, Michota FA (2010) Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in the surgical patient: options by surgery type and individual patient risk factors. Am J Surg 199(1 Suppl):S11–S20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl):e227S–e277S

    Google Scholar 

  7. Novacek G, Weltermann A, Sobala A et al (2010) Inflammatory bowel disease is a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism. Gastroenterology 139:779–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sulu B, Aytac E, Stocchi L et al (2013) The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced perioperative thromboembolic and bleeding complications for patients receiving preoperative chronic oral anticoagulant therapy who undergo colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:1339–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ et al (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126:66–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD (2002) Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 14:269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenna GS, Karthikesalingam A, Walsh SR et al (2009) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: improving practice in surgical patients. Int J Surg 7:50–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergman S, Martelli V, Monette M et al (2013) Identification of quality of care deficiencies in elderly surgical patients by measuring adherence to process-based quality indicators. J Am Coll Surg 217:858–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLeod RS, Geerts WH, Sniderman KW et al (2001) Subcutaneous heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of the Canadian colorectal DVT prophylaxis trial: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Surg 233:438–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Qadan M, Tyson M, McCafferty MH et al (2008) Venous thromboembolism in elective operations: balancing the choices. Surgery 144:654–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson KR, Berenholtz SM, Garrett-Mayer E et al (2007) Association between venous thromboembolism and perioperative allogeneic transfusion. Arch Surg 142:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. No authors listed (2015) The ACS NSQIP hospitals significantly improve outcomes over time. Bull Am Coll Surg 1005:64

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Vries EN, Hollmann MW, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA (2009) Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist. Qual Saf Health Care 18:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM et al (2007) Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 204:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffen FD, Stephens LS, Alexander JB et al (2007) The American College of Surgeons’ closed claims study: new insights for improving care. J Am Coll Surg 204:561–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwon S, Meissner M, Symons R et al (2011) Perioperative pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 213:596–603

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cornwell EE 3rd, Chang D, Velmahos G et al (2002) Compliance with sequential compression device prophylaxis in at-risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis. Am Surg 68:470–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Veterans’ Administration Health-Care Amendments of 1985, Pub L No 99-166, 99 Stat 941. (Dec 3, 1985); Title II: Health-Care Administration, Sec. 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG (2002) The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg 137:20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, riskadjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [home page on the Internet] (2005) American College of Surgeons, Chicago [cited 2012 Jan 17]. Available from: www.acsnsqip.org

  28. Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL et al (2010) Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg 210:503–508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL et al (2010) Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality improvement program approach. Adv Surg 44:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  30. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [homepage on the Internet]. American College of Surgeons, Chicago; © 2011 [cited 2011 Jun 20]. Available from: www.acsnsqip.org

  31. Gibbs J, Clark K, Khuri S, Henderson W, Hur K, Daley J (2001) Validating risk adjusted surgical outcomes: chart review of process of care. Int J Qual Health Care 13(3):187–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ et al (1997) Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):341–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raval MV, Hamilton BH, Ingraham AM, Ko CY, Hall BL (2011) The importance of assessing both inpatient and outpatient surgical quality. Ann Surg 253:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Merrill A, Millham F (2012) Increased risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a study of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients. Arch Surg 147:120–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2014) A nationwide analysis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 18:2169–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tran BH, Nguyen TJ, Hwang BH, Vidar EN, Davis GB, Chan LS, Woo K, Wong AK (2013) Risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism in 49,028 mastectomy patients. Breast 22:444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bratzler DW for the Infectious Diseases QIO Support Center. From SIP to SCIP. Online presentation recorded November 18, 2004; Oklahoma City

    Google Scholar 

  38. Erem HH, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2014) Venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: skip SCIP or comply? Tech Coloproctol 18:719–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM et al (2010) SURPASS Collaborative Group. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Flink E, Kilburn H, Morley J et al Using process measures to improve patient safety practices to prevent pulmonary embolism. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA et al (eds) Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches, vol 3, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sadeghi B, White RH, Maynard G et al (2015) Improved coding of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in administrative data (AHRQ patient safety indicator 12) after introduction of new ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Med Care 53:e37–e40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bateman AG, Sheaff R, Child S et al (2013) The implementation of NICE guidance on venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis: a before-after observational study to assess the impact on patient safety across four hospitals in England. BMC Health Serv Res 4(13):203

    Google Scholar 

  43. Greaves SW, Holubar SD (2015) Preoperative hospitalization is independently associated with increased risk for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database study. Dis Colon Rectum 58:782–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Waits SA, Reames BN, Krell RW, Bryner B et al (2014) Development of Team Action Projects in Surgery (TAPS): a multilevel team-based approach to teaching quality improvement. J Surg Educ 71:166–168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Dr. Erman Aytac is also working as a fellow at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared no commercial conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Hakan Erem M.D., FTBS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erem, H.H., Aytac, E. (2016). The Use of Surgical Care Improvement Projects in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. In: Islam, M. (eds) Thrombosis and Embolism: from Research to Clinical Practice. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 906. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_102

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_102

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22107-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22108-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics