Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Radiology for the Diagnosis of Gastric Carcinoma

  • Chapter
Book cover The Diversity of Gastric Carcinoma

Conclusions

As a result of future advancements in image engineering and computer technology, digital radiographic systems and MDCT systems will continue to evolve, and it can be predicted that new diagnostic methods that utilize the advantages of digitalization in the radiological diagnosis of gastric carcinoma will also be developed. MDCT gastrography has little potential at present as a diagnostic method for the primary lesions of gastric carcinoma. However, with further advances in MDCT, higher-speed examinations, improved image quality, and optimization of exposure dose, it appears certain that MDCT gastrography will gradually replace radiography, endoscopy, and ultrasound endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Templeton FE (1964) X-ray examination of the stomach, rev edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuru M (1966) X-ray diagnosis. In: Atlas of early gastric carcinoma of the stomach. Nakayama-Shoten, Tokyo, pp 219–223

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shirakabe H, Ichikwa H, Kumakura K, et al (1966) Atlas of X-ray diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Igaku Shoin, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ichikawa H (1993) X-ray diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Gastric cancer. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 232–245

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okumura T, Maruyama M (1993) A prospective study on advanced gastric cancer detection by mass screening. Gastric Cancer. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 263–277

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, et al (1983) Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148:833–838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillman BJ, Ovitt TW, Nudelman S, et al (1981) Digital video subtraction angiography of renal vascular abnormalities. Radiology 139:277–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iinuma G, Ushio K, Ishikawa T, et al (2001) Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography with a 4 million-pixels charge-coupled device. Radiology 214:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209:327–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH (2000) Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 215:55–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Metz CE, Goodenough DJ, Rossmann K (1973) Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography. Radiology 109:297–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al (1991) Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 181:426–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Habermann RC, Weiss F, Riecken R, et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ba-Ssalamah A, Prokop M, Uffmann M, et al (2003) Dedicated multidetector CT of the stomach: spectrum of diseases. Radiographics 181:426–432

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dachman A (2003) Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Mori Y, et al (2002) Lung: feasibility of a method for changing tube current during low-dose helical CT. Radiology 224:905–912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Iinuma G, Moriyama N (2004) Clinical potential of CT gastrography for visualization of gastric cancers. In: Recent advances in gastric cancers: the 17th International Symposium of Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research, pp 37–38

    Google Scholar 

  20. Summers RM (2003) Road maps for advancement of radiologic computer-aided detection in the 21st century. Radiology 229:11–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iinuma, G. et al. (2005). Recent Advances in Radiology for the Diagnosis of Gastric Carcinoma. In: Kaminishi, M., Takubo, K., Mafune, Ki. (eds) The Diversity of Gastric Carcinoma. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27713-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27713-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-21139-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-27713-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics