Skip to main content

A Proposal for Case Study Methodology in Supply Chain Integration Research

  • Chapter
Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management

Summary

This paper describes a case study research proposal designed to explore how and why firms chose to integrate process activities with supply chain partners. Previous quantitative studies suggest that integrating demand management, collaborative forecasting, and demand planning activities can lead to competitive advantage and improved supply chain performance. This qualitative research fills a gap in previous research by exploring the phenomenon of Interfirm Demand Integration in a true supply chain context, garnering perceptions from multiple supply chain partners. Results are expected to contribute to managerial, theoretical, and methodological knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  • Achrol, R. S. (1997): Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1): 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. P., Perreault, W. D. (1999): Buyer-Seller Relationships in Business Markets, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November): 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937): The Nature of the Firm, in: Economica N.S., 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1994): The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations, in: Journal of Marketing, 58 (October): 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. (1996): The Use of the Case Study Method in Logistics Research, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 17(2), 193–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962): Power-Dependence Relations, in: American Sociological Review, 27: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, in: American Journal of Sociology, 19 (November): 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanfield, R. B., Melnyk, S. A. (1998): The Scientific Theory-Building Process: A Primer Using the Case of TQM, in: Journal of Operations Management, 16, 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B. (1994): Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels, in: Journal of Marketing, 58 (January): 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., John G. (1990): Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1): 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1990): Cooperation. Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory, in: Academy of Management Review, 15, 500–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S D., Morgan R. M. (1995): The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition, in: Journal of Marketing, 59 (April): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. W., Stump, R L. (1999): The Contingent Effect of Specific Asset Investments on Joint Action in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: An Empirical Test of the Moderating Role of Reciprocal Asset Investments, Uncertainty, and Trust, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3): 291–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (1992): Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. (1980): The New Social Contract. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J., Galbraith, J. R. (1981): Interdepartmental Relations, in: Handbook of Organizational Design, 2: 60–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. M. (2003): Interfirm Demand Integration: The Role of Marketing in Bridging the Gap between Demand and Supply Chain Management, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Kahn, K. B. (1995): A Framework of Logistics Research, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 16(1): 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1984): Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods; Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näslund, D. (2002): Logistics Needs Qualitative Research — Especially Action Research, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management: 32(5), 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J, Salancik G. R. (1978): The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective; Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • QSR International (2002): Nvivo Qualitative Data Analysis Program, third edition, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, V. (2001): Integrating Demand and Supply Chain Management, in: Supply Chain Management Review, (September): 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfiled, R., McLachlin, R., Samson, D. (2002): Effective Case Research in Operations Management: A Process Perspective, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., Kelley, H. H. (1959): The Social Psychology of Groups, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2000): Transaction Cost and Resource-Based Explanations of Joint Ventures: A Comparison and Synthesis, in: Organization Studies, 21(1): 215–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vokurka, R. J., Lummus, R. R. (1998): Balancing Marketing and Supply Chain Activities, in: Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(4): 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, B. A., Jap, S. D. (1995): Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4: 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, and Relational Contracting, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003): Case Study Research: Design and Methods, third edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Venkatraman N. (1995): Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange, in: Strategic Management Journal, 16: 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, T.M., Golicic, S.L. (2005). A Proposal for Case Study Methodology in Supply Chain Integration Research. In: Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Müller, M., Reiner, G. (eds) Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics