Scheduling to minimize total weighted completion time: Performance guarantees of LPbased heuristics and lower bounds
 Andreas S. Schulz
 … show all 1 hide
Abstract
There has been recent success in using polyhedral formulations of scheduling problems not only to obtain good lower bounds in practice but also to develop provably good approximation algorithms. Most of these formulations rely on binary decision variables that are a kind of assignment variables. We present quite simple polynomialtime approximation algorithms that are based on linear programming formulations with completion time variables and give the best known performance guarantees for minimizing the total weighted completion time in several scheduling environments. This amplifies the importance of (appropriate) polyhedral formulations in the design of approximation algorithms with good worstcase performance guarantees.
In particular, for the problem of minimizing the total weighted completion time on a single machine subject to precedence constraints we present a polynomialtime approximation algorithm with performance ratio better than 2. This outperforms a (4 + ε)approximation algorithm very recently proposed by Hall, Shmoys, and Wein that is based on timeindexed formulations. A slightly extended formulation leads to a performance guarantee of 3 for the same problem but with release dates. This improves a factor of 5.83 for the same problem and even the 4approximation algorithm for the problem with release dates but without precedence constraints, both also due to Hall, Shmoys, and Wein.
By introducing new linear inequalities, we also show how to extend our technique to parallel machine problems. This leads, for instance, to the best known approximation algorithm for scheduling jobs with release dates on identical parallel machines. Finally, for the flow shop problem to minimize the total weighted completion time with both precedence constraints and release dates we present the first approximation algorithm that achieves a worstcase performance guarantee that is linear in the number of machines. We even extend this to multiprocessor flow shop scheduling.
The proofs of these results also imply guarantees for the lower bounds obtained by solving the proposed linear programming relaxations. This emphasizes the strength of linear programming formulations using completion time variables.
 J. L. Bruno, E. G. Coffman Jr., and R. Sethi. Scheduling independent tasks to reduce mean finishing time. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 17:382–387, 1974.
 S. Chakrabarti, C. A. Phillips, A. S. Schulz, D. B. Shmoys, C. Stein, and J. Wein. Improved scheduling algorithms for minsum criteria, 1996. To appear in Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the 23rd ICALP Conference.
 M. E. Dyer and L. A. Wolsey. Formulating the single machine sequencing problem with release dates as a mixed integer program. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 26:255–270, 1990. CrossRef
 M. R. Garey, D. S. Johnson, and R. Sethi. The complexity of flowshop and jobshop scheduling. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1:117–129, 1976.
 R. L. Graham, E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, and A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan. Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5:287–326, 1979.
 M. Grötschel, L. Lovász, and A. Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, volume 2 of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer, Berlin, 1988.
 M. X. Goemans. A supermodular relaxation for scheduling with release dates. This volume, 1996.
 T. Gonzalez and S. Sahni. Flowshop and jobshop schedules: Complexity and approximation. Operations Research, 26:36–52, 1978.
 J. A. Hoogeveen, C. Hurkens, J. K. Lenstra, and A. Vandevelde. Lower bounds for the multiprocessor flow shop. In preparation.
 D. S. Hochbaum and D. B. Shmoys. A polynomial approximation scheme for scheduling on uniform processors: Using the dual approximation approach. SIAM Journal on Computing, 17:539–551, 1988. CrossRef
 L. A. Hall, A. S. Schulz, D. B. Shmoys, and J. Wein. Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Offline and online algorithms, 1996. In preparation.
 L. A. Hall, D. B. Shmoys, and J. Wein. Personal communication, September 1995.
 L. A. Hall, D. B. Shmoys, and J. Wein. Scheduling to minimize average completion time: Offline and online algorithms. In Proceedings of the 7th ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 142–151, January 1996.
 T. Kawaguchi and S. Kyan. Worst case bound of an LRF schedule for the mean weighted flowtime problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15:1119–1129, 1986. CrossRef
 E. L. Lawler. Sequencing jobs to minimize total weighted completion time subject to precedence constraints. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 2:75–90, 1978.
 E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, and D. B. Shmoys. Sequencing and scheduling: Algorithms and complexity. In S. C. Graves, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, and P. H. Zipkin, editors, Logistics of Production and Inventory, volume 4 of Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, pages 445–522. NorthHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993.
 J. K. Lenstra, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, and P. Brucker. Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 1:343–362, 1977.
 J. K. Lenstra, D. B. Shmoys, and É. Tardos. Approximation algorithms for scheduling unrelated parallel machines. Mathematical Programming, 46:259–271, 1990. CrossRef
 R. H. Möhring, M. W. Schäffter, and A. S. Schulz. Scheduling with communication delays: Minimizing the average weighted completion time. Preprint, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 1996.
 C. Phillips, C. Stein, and J. Wein. Scheduling jobs that arrive over time. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, number 955 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 86–97. Springer, Berlin, 1995.
 M. Queyranne and A. S. Schulz. Polyhedral approaches to machine scheduling. Preprint 408/1994, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 1994.
 M. Queyranne and A. S. Schulz. Scheduling unit jobs with compatible release dates on parallel machines with nonstationary speeds. In E. Balas and J. Clausen, editors, Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, number 920 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 307–320. Springer, Berlin, 1995. Proceedings of the 4th International IPCO Conference.
 M. Queyranne. Structure of a simple scheduling polyhedron. Mathematical Programming, 58:263–285, 1993. CrossRef
 M. Queyranne. Personal communication, September 1995.
 M. Queyranne and Y. Wang. A cutting plane procedure for precedenceconstrained single machine scheduling. Working paper. Faculty of Commerce, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1991.
 C. Rajendran and D. Chaudhuri. A multistage parallelprocessor flowshop problem with minimum flowtime. European Journal of Operational Research, 57:111–122, 1992. CrossRef
 A. S. Schulz. Polytopes and Scheduling. PhD thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
 A. S. Schulz. Scheduling to minimize total weighted completion time: Performance guarantees of LPbased heuristics and lower bounds. Preprint 474/1995, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
 W. E. Smith. Various optimizers for singlestage production. Naval Research and Logistics Quarterly, 3:59–66, 1956.
 D. B. Shmoys and E. Tardos. An approximation algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Mathematical Programming, 62:461–474, 1993. CrossRef
 Title
 Scheduling to minimize total weighted completion time: Performance guarantees of LPbased heuristics and lower bounds
 Book Title
 Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization
 Book Subtitle
 5th International IPCO Conference Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 3–5, 1996 Proceedings
 Pages
 pp 301315
 Copyright
 1996
 DOI
 10.1007/3540613102_23
 Print ISBN
 9783540613107
 Online ISBN
 9783540684534
 Series Title
 Lecture Notes in Computer Science
 Series Volume
 1084
 Series ISSN
 03029743
 Publisher
 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
 Copyright Holder
 SpringerVerlag
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Industry Sectors
 eBook Packages
 Editors
 Authors

 Andreas S. Schulz ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Fachbereich Mathematik (MA 61), Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 136, D10623, Berlin, Germany
Continue reading...
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.