Abstract
Human-computer systems have traditionally been analysed and described in terms of their components — humans and computers — plus the interaction. Several contemporary schools of thought point out that decomposed descriptions are insufficient, and that a description on the level of the system as a whole is needed instead. The dependability of human-computer systems must therefore refer to the performance characteristics of the joint system, and specifically the variability of human performance, not just as stochastic variations but also as purposeful local optimisation.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amalberti, R. (1996). La conduite des systèmes à risques, Paris: PUF.
Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775–779.
Billings, C. E. (1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Technical Memorandum 103885). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Hollnagel, E. (1998). Cognitive reliability and error analysis method — CREAM. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Hollnagel, E. (1999). From function allocation to function congruence. In S. Dekker & E. Hollnagel (Eds.), Coping with computers in the cockpit. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Leplat, J. & Rasmussen, J. (1987). Analysis of human errors in industrial incidents and accidents for improvement of work safety. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error. London: Wiley.
Marsden, P. & Hollnagel, E. Human interaction with technology: The accidental user. Acta Psychologica, 91, 345–358.
Miller, D. P. & Swain, A. D. (1987). Human Error and Human Reliability. In G. Salvendy (Ed.) Handbook of Human factors. New York: Wiley.
Moray, N., Inagaki, T. & Itoh, M. (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(1), 44–58.
Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, J. T. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T Press.
Wiener, E. L. & Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23(10), pp. 995–1011.
Woods, D. D. (1986). Cognitive technologies: The design of joint human-machine systems. The AI Magazine, 6(4), 86–92.
Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I. & Sarter, N. B. (1994). Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers and hindsight. Columbus, Ohio: CSERIAC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hollnagel, E. (2002). Dependability of Joint Human-Computer Systems. In: Anderson, S., Felici, M., Bologna, S. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability and Security. SAFECOMP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2434. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45732-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45732-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44157-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45732-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive