Abstract
Standard practice in quantitative structural neuroimaging is a segmentation into brain tissue, subcortical structures, fluid space and lesions followed by volume calculations of gross structures. On the other hand, it is evident that object characterization by size does only capture one of multiple aspects of a full structural characterization. Desirable parameters are local and global parameters like length, elongation, bending, width, complexity, bumpiness and many more. In neuroimaging research there is increasing evidence that shape analysis of brain structures provides new information which is not available by conventional volumetric measurements. This motivates development of novel morphometric analysis techniques answering clinical research questions which have been asked for a long time but which remained unanswered due to the lack of appropriate measurement tools. Challenges are the choice of biologically meaningful shape representations, robustness to noise and small perturbations, and the ability to apture the shape properties of populations that represent natural biological shape variation. This paper describes experiments with two different shape representation schemes, a fine-scale, global surface characterization using spherical harmonics, and a coarsely sampled medial representation (3D skeleton). Driving applications are the detection of group differences of amhygdala-hippocampal shapes in schizophrenia and the analysis of ventricular shape similarity in a mono/dizygotic twin study. The results clearly demonstrate that shape captures information on structural similarity or difference which is not accessible by volume analysis. Improved global and local structure characterization as proposed herein might help to explain pathological changes in neurodevelopment/neurodegeneration in terms of their biological meaning.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bibliography
Bartley, A.J., Douglas, W.J., and Weinberger, D.R., Genetic variability of human brain size and cortical gyral patterns, Brain (1997), 120, 257–269.
Brechbuehler, Ch, Gerig, G. and Kuebler, O. “Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3D shape description”, Comp. Vision and Image Underst. (CVIU), Vol. 61,No. 2, pp. 154–170, 1995
Cootes T.F. et al. (1995) Active Shape Models–Their Training and Application, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1), pp. 31–59.
Csernansky, J., Joshi, S., Wang, L., Haller, J., Gado, M., Miller, J., Grenander, U., and Miller, M., Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia via high dimensional brain mapping, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95:11406–11411, Sept. 1998
Haller, J., Christensen, G. E., Joshi, S.C, Newcomer, J. W., Miller, M. I., Csernansky, J. G., Vannier, M. W., Hipppocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching, Radiology, Vol. 199, pp. 787–791, 1996.
Haller, J., Banerjee, A., Christensen, G. E, Joshi, S.C., Miller, M.I., Vannier, M.W., J. Csernansky, G., “Three-Dimensional Hipocampal Volumetry by High Dimensional Transformation of a neuroanatomical Atlas,”, Radiology, Vol. 202, pp. 504–510, 1997.
Kelemen, A., Szekely, G. and Gerig, G. (1999) Elastic Model-Based Segmentation of 3D Neuroradiological Data Sets, IEEE Transactions On Medical Imaging, 18, 828–839.
Pizer, S.M., Fritsch, D.S., Yushkevich, P.A., Johnson, V.E., and Chaney, E.L., Segmentation, Registration, and Measurement of Shape Variation via Image Object Shape, IEEE TMI 18(10):851–865, Oct. 1999
Shenton ME, Wible CG, McCarley RW. (1997) MRI studies in schizophrenia, In: Krishnan KRR, Doraiswamy PM (Eds.), Brain Imaging in clinical Psychiatry. Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 297–380.
Staib L.H. and Duncan J.S. (1996) Model-based Deformable Surface Finding for Medical Images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 15(5), pp. 1–12.
Styner, M. and Gerig, G., Hybrid boundary-medial shape description for biologically variable shapes, Proc. IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA), pp. 235–242, June 2000
Styner, M. and Gerig, G., Medial models incorporating object variability for 3D shape analysis, to be published in Proc. of IPMI 2001, Springer Verlag, June 2001
Suddath, R.L., Christison, G.W., Torrey, E.F., Casanova, M.F., and Weinberger, D.R., Anatomical abnormalities in the brains of monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. [Published erratum in New England Journal of Medicine, 322:1616, 1990.], New England Journal of Medicine, 322:789–794, 1990.
Székely, G, A Kelemen, C Brechbühler, G Gerig (1996). Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models. Medical Image Analysis 1(1): 19–34.
Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, 1998
Wang, L., Sarang, C.J., Miller, M.I., Grenander, U., and Csernansky, J.G., Statistical Analysis of Hippocampal Asymmetry, in press, NeuroImage. to appear 2001.
Yushkevich, P., Pizer, S.M., Joshi, S., and Marron, J.S., Intuitive, Localized Analysis of Shape Variability, to be published in Proc. IPMI 2001, Springer Verlag, June 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gerig, G., Styner, M., Shenton, M.E., Lieberman, J.A. (2001). Shape versus Size: Improved Understanding of the Morphology of Brain Structures. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2001. MICCAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45468-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45468-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42697-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45468-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive