Skip to main content

Linguistic Relations Encoding in a Symbolic- Connectionist Hybrid Natural Language Processor

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1952))

Abstract

In recent years, the Natural Language Processing scene has witnessed the steady growth of interest in connectionist modeling. The main appeal of such an approach is that one does not have to determine the grammar rules in advance: the learning abilities displayed by such systems take care of input regularities. Better and faster learning can be obtained through the implementation of a symbolic-connectionist hybrid system. Such system combines the advantages of symbolic approaches, by introducing symbolic rules as network connection weights, with the advantages of connectionism. In a hybrid system called HTRP, words within a sentence are represented by means of semantic features. The features for the verbs are arranged along certain semantic dimensions, and are mutually exclusive within each dimension. One may infer that this happens because of the semantic features encoded in the network inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dowty, D.: On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’, in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (Eds.), Properties, Types, and Meaning, vol. 2, Semantic Issues, Dordrecht: Kluwer (1989) 69–129

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franchi, C. and Cançado, M.: Thematic Hierarchy (in Portuguese), Unpublished paper, Unicamp/USP, UFMG, Brazil (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fu, L. M.: Knowledge-Based Connectionism for Revising Domain Theories, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 23, No.1 (1993) 173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcez, A. S. d’A., Zaverucha, G., and Carvalho, L. A. V.: Connectionist Inductive Learning and Logic Programming System, System Engineering and Computing Program —COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Technical Report (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haegeman, L.: Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., and Fong, S.: Natural Language Grammatical Inference with Recurrent Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2000) 126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R., and Amyote, L.: Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts, Language and Cognitive Processes, 12 (2/3) (1997) 137–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McClelland, J. L. and Kawamoto, A. H.: Mechanisms of Sentence Processing: Assigning Roles to Constituents of Sentences. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 2. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa, J. L. G. and Françozo, E.: Hybrid Thematic Role Processor: Symbolic Linguistic Relations Revised by Connectionist Learning. Proceedings of IJCAI’99 — Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Volume 2, Stockholm, Sweden, 31 July-6 August, Morgan Kaufmann (1999) 852–857

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblatt, F.: The Perceptron: A Perceiving and Recognizing Automaton, Report 85-460-1, Project PARA, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Ithaca, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J.: Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation, in D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing-Volume 1: Foundations, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Setiono, R. and Liu, H.: Symbolic Representation of Neural Networks, IEEE Computer, Vol. 29, No. 3 (1996) 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  13. Towell, G. G. and Shavlik, J. W.: Extracting Refined Rules from Knowledge-based Neural Networks, Machine Learning, 13 (1993) 71–101

    Google Scholar 

  14. Waltz, D. L. and Pollack, J. B.: Massively Parallel Parsing: A Strongly Interactive Model of Natural Language Interpretations. Cognitive Science 9 (1985) 51–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garcia Rosa, J.L., Françozo, E. (2000). Linguistic Relations Encoding in a Symbolic- Connectionist Hybrid Natural Language Processor. In: Monard, M.C., Sichman, J.S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. IBERAMIA SBIA 2000 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1952. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44399-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics