Skip to main content

The Role of Ontologies for an Effective and Unambiguous Dissemination of Clinical Guidelines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools (EKAW 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1937))

Abstract

Guidelines for clinical practice are being introduced in an extensive way in more and more different fields of medicine They have the potential to improve the quality and cost-efficiency of care in a complex health care delivery environment. Computerization may increase the effectiveness of both the information retrieval of guidelines and the management of guideline-based care. The scenario is evolving from stand-alone workstations to telematics applications that enable guidelines development and dissemination. However, such a knowledge sharing requires the definition of formal models for guidelines representation. The models should have a clear semantics in order to avoid ambiguities. The role of ontologies is that of making explicit the conceptualizations behind a model. In this paper we present our library of generic and domain ontologies and point out its role for integrating existing guideline models and defining standard representations. In particular, we stress the distinction -often collapsed within existing guideline models- between the conceptualization of actual procedures, the conceptualization of planning, and the conceptualization behind the diagrammatic representation of plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Woolf SH. Practice Guidelines, a New Reality in Medicine: Impact on Patient Care. Arch Intern Med, 1993; 153: 2646–2655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of Clinical Guidelines on Medical Practice: a Systematic Review of Rigorous Evaluations. Lancet, 1993; 342: 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clayton PD, Hripcsak G. Decision support in healthcare. Int. J. of Bio-Medical Computing, 1995; 39: 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hibble A., Kanka D., Penheon D., Pooles F: Guidelines in general practice: The new Tower of Babel? British Medical Journal, 1998; 317: 862–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vissers MC, Hasman A, vander Linden CJ. Protocol Processing System (ProtoVIEW) to Support Residents at the Emergency Ward. Proc. MIE 94, 1994: 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ertle AR, Campbell EM, Hersh WR. Automated Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Asthma Management. Proc. AMIA 96, 1996: 552–556.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon CJ et al. Telematics for Clinical Guidelines: A Conceptual Modeling Approach. Proc MIE 97, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox J, Johns N, Rahmanzadeh A. Disseminating Medical Knowledge: The PROforma Approach Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1998; 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes M, Barnett GO. An Architecture for a Distributed Guideline Server.Proc. 19th SCAMC, 1995: 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cimino JJ, Socratous SA. Automated Guidelines Implemented via the World Wide Web.Proc. 19th SCAMC, 1995: 941.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liem EB, Obeid JS, Shareck EP, Sato L, Greenes RA. Representation of Clinical Practice Guidelines through an Interactive World-Wide-Web Interface.Proc. 19th SCAMC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pisanelli DM, Consorti F, Merialdo P. SMART: A System Supporting Medical Activities in Real Time, Proc. MIE 97, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musen MA, Tu SW, Das AK, Shahar Y. EON: A component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. JAMIA, 1996; 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musen MA, Carlson CW, Fagan LM et al. T-HELPER: Automated support for communitybased clinical research. Proc. 16th SCAMC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gennari JH, Altman RB, Musen MA. Reuse with Protégé-II. Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Reuse, Seattle, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steve G, Gangemi A, Pisanelli DM, “Integrating Medical Terminologies with ONIONS Methodology”, in: Info.Modelling and Knowledge Bases VIII, Amsterdam, IOS Press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pisanelli DM, Gangemi A, Steve G, “A Medical Ontology Library that integrates the UMLS Metathesaurus”, Proc. AI in Medicine, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Library of Medicine, UMLS Knowledge Sources, 1998 edition, available from the NLM, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gruber TR, “A translation approach to portable ontology specification”, Knowledge Acquisition, 5 (2), 1993: 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MacGregor RM, “A Description Classifier for the Predicate Calculus” Proceedings of AAAI 94, Conference, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swartout B, Patil R, Knight K, Russ T, “Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies”, Proceedings of Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, participants edition, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pisanelli DM, Gangemi A, Steve G, “WWW-available Conceptual Integration of Medical Terminologies”, Proc. AMIA 97, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guarino N, Carrara M, Giaretta P, An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories. Proc. of KR94. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmannn, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pisanelli DM, Gangemi A, Steve G, “An Ontological Analysis of the UMLS Metathesaurus”, Proc. AMIA 98, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P. The Asgaard project, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1998; 14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ohno-Machado L et al. The Guideline Interchange Format, JAMIA, 1998; 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pisanelli, D.M., Gangemi, A., Steve, G. (2000). The Role of Ontologies for an Effective and Unambiguous Dissemination of Clinical Guidelines. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools. EKAW 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1937. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39967-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics