Skip to main content

Autonomous Planning and Scheduling on the TechSat 21 Mission

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2557))

Abstract

The Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment (ASE) will fly onboard the Air Force TechSat 21 constellation of three spacecraft scheduled for launch in 2006. ASE uses onboard continuous planning, robust task and goal-based execution, model-based mode identification and reconfiguration, and onboard machine learning and pattern recognition to radically increase science return by enabling intelligent downlink selection and autonomous retargeting. In this paper we discuss how these AI technologies are synergistically integrated in a hybrid multi-layer control architecture to enable a virtual spacecraft science agent. Demonstration of these capabilities in a flight environment will open up tremendous new opportunities in planetary science, space physics, and earth science that would be unreachable without this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.C. Burl, L. Asker, P. Smyth, U. Fayyad, P. Perona, J. Aubele, and L. Crumpler, “Learning to Recognize Volcanoes on Venus,” Machine Learning Journal, April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.C. Burl and D. Lucchetti, “Autonomous Visual Discovery”, SPIE Aerosense Conference on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, (Orlando, FL), April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Burl, W.J. Merline, E.B. Bierhaus, W. Colwell, C.R. Chapman, “Automated Detection of Craters and Other Geological Features” Intl Symp Artificial Intelligence Robotics & Automation in Space, Montreal, Canada, June 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Chien, G. Rabideau, R. Knight, R. Sherwood, B. Engelhardt, D. Mutz, T. Estlin, B. Smith, F. Fisher, T. Barrett, G. Stebbins, D. Tran, “ASPEN-Automating Space Mission Operations using Automated Planning and Scheduling,” SpaceOps, Toulouse, France, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chien, R. Knight, A. Stechert, R. Sherwood, and G. Rabideau, “Using Iterative Repair to Improve Responsiveness of Planning and Scheduling,” Proc Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling, Breckenridge, CO, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Chien, B. Engelhardt, R. Knight, G. Rabideau, R. Sherwood, E. Hansen, A. Ortiviz, C. Wilklow, S. Wichman “Onboard Autonomy on the Three Corner Sat Mission,” Intl Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space, Montreal, Canada, June 2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Jonsson, P. Morris, N. Muscettola, K. Rajan, and B. Smith, “Planning in Interplanetary Space: Theory and Practice,” Procs 5th Int Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, Breckenridge, CO, April 2000. J. Kurien and P.P. Nayak, “Back to the Future for Consistency-based Trajectory Tracking,” Proc. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, TX, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. P. Bonasso, R. J. Firby, E. Gat, D. Kortenkamp, D. Miller, and M. Slack, Experiences with Architecture for Intelligent, Reactive Agents, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Chien, A. Barrett, T. Estlin, and G. Rabideau, A Comparison of Coordinate Planning Methods for Cooperating Rovers, Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2000), Barcelona, Spain, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Clement, A. Barrett, E. Durfee, and G. Rabideau, “Using Abstraction to Coordinate Multiple Robotic Spacecraft,” Proceedings of the 2001 Intelligent Robots and Systems Conference, Maui, HI, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Muscettola, G. Dorais, C. Fry, R. Levinson, and C. Plaunt, “IDEA: Planning at the Core of Autonomous Reactive Agents,” Proceedings of the AIPS-2002 Conference, Tolouse, France, April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Rabideau, R. Knight, S. Chien, A. Fukunaga, A. Govindjee, “Iterative Repair Planning for Spacecraft Operations in the ASPEN System,” Intl Symp on A.I. Robotics and Automation in Space, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Sherwood, G. Rabideau, S. Chien, B. Engelhardt, “ASPEN User’s Guide,” http://aspen.jpl.nasa.gov, August 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sherwood, R., Chien, S., Castano, R., Rabideau, G. (2002). Autonomous Planning and Scheduling on the TechSat 21 Mission. In: McKay, B., Slaney, J. (eds) AI 2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2557. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36187-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36187-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36187-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics