Abstract
Determination of the earthquake hypocenter represents a basic problem routinely solved in seismology. The problem belongs to the class of simpler problems in geophysics, but it is still difficult to solve. The dimension of the model space is low (three coordinates of the hypocenter plus origin time, resulting in four parameters to be searched for), but the forward problem exhibits a case-to-case-dependent degree of nonlinearity. The standard solution is based on minimizing the time residuals (differences between observed and computed arrivals of seismic waves) in the common L2 norm. We have compiled a set of 56 synthetic earthquake hypocenter location tasks, which was submitted to three different optimizers for solution: (i) Powell’s method, (ii) the downhill simplex algorithm and (iii) the differential evolution (DE) algorithm. Each localization process listed was performed two times using exact and approximate forward modeling. Our analysis has shown that the DE algorithm has worked with 100 % reliability, while other optimizing algorithms have often failed. The accuracy achieved by using the DE algorithm was at least the same or better than that achieved by competing algorithms. The only minor disadvantage of the DE algorithm is a higher computational effort needed to reach the solution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Billings SD (1994) Simulated annealing for earthquake location. Geophysical Journal International 118:680–692
Billings SD, Kennett BLN, Sambridge MS (1994) Hypocenter location: genetic algorithms incorporating problem-specific information. Geophysical Journal International 118:693–706
Bondar I (1994) Hypocenter determination of local earthquake using genetic algorithm. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 29:39–56
Buland R (1976) The mechanics of locating earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 66:173–187
Červený V, Molotkov IA, Pšenčík I (1977) Ray method in seismology. Charles University Press, Prague
Fischer T, Horálek J (2000) Refined locations of the swarm earthquakes in the Nový Kostel focal zone and spatial distribution of the January 1997 swarm in Western Bohemia, Czech Republic. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 44:210–226
Geiger L (1910) Herdbestimmung der Erdbeben aus den Ankunftzeiten. Der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 4:331–349
Herrmann RB (1979) FASTHYPO — A hypocentre location program. Earthquake Notes 50:25–37
Janský J, Horálek J, Málek J, Boušková A (2000) Homogeneous velocity models of the West Bohemian swarm region obtained by grid search. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 44:158–174
Klein RW (1978) Hypocenter location program HYPOINVERSE part I: Users guide to versions 1, 2, 3 and 4. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-694
Lee WHK, Lahr JC (1972) HYPO71: A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude, and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 75-311
Lienert BR, Berg E, Frazer LN (1986) HYPOCENTER: An earthquake location method using centered, scaled, and adaptively damped least squares. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 76:771–783
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7:308–313
Olsson DM, Nelson LS (1975) The Nelder-Mead simplex procedure for function minimization. Technometrics 17:45–51
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press
Price K, Storn R (1997) Differential evolution. Dr. Dobb’s Journal April:18–24
Rabinowitz N (1988) Microearthquake location by means of nonlinear simplex procedure. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 78:380–384
Růžek B, Kvasnička M (2001) Differential evolution algorithm in the earthquake hypocenter location. Pure and Applied Geophysics 158:667–693
Sambridge M, Gallagher K (1993) Earthquake hypocenter location using genetic algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 83:1467–1491
Sambridge MS, Kennett BLN (1986) A novel method of hypocenter location. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 87:679–697
Shearer PM (1997) Improving local earthquake locations using the L1 norm and waveform cross correlation: Application to the Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence. Journal of Geophysics Research 102:8269–8283
Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution — a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11:241–354
Tarvainen M, Tiira T, Husebye ES (1999) Locating regional seismic events with global optimization based on interval arithmetic. Geophysics Joural International 138:879–885
Tselentis GA, Melis NS, Sokos E, Papatsimpa K (1996) The Egion June 15, 1995 (6.2 ML) earthquake, Western Greece. PAGEOPH 147(1):83–97
Xie Z, Spencer TW, Rabinowitz PD, Fahlquist DA (1996) A new regional hypocenter location method. Bulletin of the Seismology Society of America 86:946–958
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Růžek, B., Kvasnička, M. (2005). Determination of the Earthquake Hypocenter: A Challenge for the Differential Evolution Algorithm. In: Differential Evolution. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31306-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31306-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20950-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31306-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)