Skip to main content

Laparoscopy in the Acute Abdomen

  • Chapter
Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Navez B, Tassetti V, Scohy JJ, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute peritonitis. Br J Surg 1998;85:32–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung RS, Diaz JJ, Chari V. Efficacy of routine laparoscopy for the acute abdomen. Surg Endosc 1998;12:219–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanna A, Adani GL, Anania G, et al. The role of laparoscopy in patients with suspected peritonitis: experience of a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2003;13:17–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Achilles E, et al. Effect of a pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat. Surg Endosc 1995;9:898–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Strate T, et al. Laparoscopic vs open repair of gastric perforation and abdominal lavage of associated peritonitis in pigs. Surg Endosc 1998;12:212–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bloechle C, Kluth D, Holstein AF, et al. A pneumoperitoneum perpetuates severe damage to the ultrastructural integrity of parietal peritoneum in gastric perforation-induced peritonitis in rats. Surg Endosc 1999;13:683–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. West MA, Baker J, Bellingham J. Kinetics of decreased LPS-stimulated cytokine release by macrophages exposed to CO2. J Surg Res 1996;63:269–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. West MA, Hackam DJ, Baker J, et al. Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide: relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 1997;226:179–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clary EM, Bruch SM, Lau CL, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic and systemic immunologic responses to peritonitis in pigs. J Surg Res 2002;108:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanly EJ, Mendoza-Sagaon M, Murata K, et al. CO2 pneumoperitoneum modifies the inflammatory response to sepsis. Ann Surg 2003;237:343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalized peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:6–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau JY, Lo SY, Ng EK, et al. A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair. Am J Surg 1998;186:325–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1999;134:845–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagne DJ, Malay MB, Hogle NJ, et al. Bedside diagnostic minilaparoscopy in the intensive care patient. Surgery 2002;131:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandt CP, Priebe PP, Echhauser ML. Diagnostic laparoscopy in the intensive care patient: avoiding the nontherapeutic laparotomy. Surg Endosc 7:168–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orlando R, Crowell KI. Laparoscopy in the critically ill. Surg Endosc 1997;11:1072–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forde K, Treat M. The role of peritoneoscopy (laparoscopy) in the evaluation of the acute abdomen in critically ill patients. Surg Endosc 1992;6:219–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkie N, et al. Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure? Surg Endosc 2000;14:478–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Navez B, Arimont JM, Guiot P. Laparoscopioc approach in acute small bowel obstruction. A review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:132–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montariol T, et al. Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2000;10:155–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 2001;71:641–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer CP, Doherty D. Laparoscopic approach to small bowel obstruction. Semin Laparosc Surg 2002;9:40–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fowler, D.L. (2006). Laparoscopy in the Acute Abdomen. In: Assalia, A., Gagner, M., Schein, M. (eds) Controversies in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30964-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22952-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30964-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics