Skip to main content

Dose Calculations for IMRT

  • Chapter
Image-Guided IMRT
  • 2645 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mackie TR et al. (1985) Lung dose corrections for 6-and 15-MV X-rays. Med Phys 12(3):327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu CX, Mackie TR, Wong JW (1995) Photon dose calculation incorporating explicit electron transport. Med Phys 22(7):1157–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnfield MR et al. (2000) The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose. Med Phys 27(6):1266–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohan R et al. (2000) The impact of fluctuations in intensity patterns on the number of monitor units and the quality and accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys 27(6):1226–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JO et al. (2001) A Monte Carlo study of radiation transport through multileaf collimators. Med Phys 28(12):2497–2506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Low DA (2002) Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 12(3):219–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mackie TR et al. (1996) Photon beam dose computations. In: Mackie TR, Palta JR (eds) Teletherapy: present and future. Advanced Medical Publishing, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  8. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group (2001) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(4) 880–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Meerleer G et al. (2004) Direct segment aperture and weight optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 180(3):136–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Y et al. (2003) Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT. Med Phys 30(11):2937–2947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xing L et al. (2000) Monitor unit calculation for an intensity modulated photon field by a simple scatter-summation algorithm. Phys Med Biol 45(3):N1–N7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohan R, Chui CS (1987) Use of fast Fourier transforms in calculating dose distributions for irregularly shaped fields for three-dimensional treatment planning. Med Phys 14(1):70–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceberg CP, Bjarngard BE, Zhu TC (1996) Experimental determination of the dose kernel in high-energy X-ray beams. Med Phys 23(4):505–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Storchi P, Woudstra E (1996) Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data. Phys Med Biol 41(4):637–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bourland JD, Chaney EL (1992) A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions. Med Phys 19(6):1401–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackie TR, Scrimger JW, Battista JJ (1985) A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV X-rays. Med Phys 12(2):188–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyer A, Mok E (1985) A photon dose distribution model employing convolution calculations. Med Phys 12(2):169–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahnesjo A (1989) Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Med Phys 16(4):577–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Siebers JV et al. (2001) Acceleration of dose calculations for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys 28(6):903–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Q et al. (2003) A fast dose calculation method based on table lookup for IMRT optimization. Phys Med Biol 48(12):N159–N166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Q, Mohan R (2000) Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system. Med Phys 27(4):701–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Siebers JV et al. (2002) Incorporating multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing into iterative IMRT optimization. Med Phys 29(6):952–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Seco J, Evans PM, Webb S (2002) An optimization algorithm that incorporates IMRT delivery constraints. Phys Med Biol 47(6):899–915

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cho PS, Marks RJ II (2000) Hardware-sensitive optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 45(2):429–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bortfeld T, Schlegel W, Rhein B (1993) Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculations in three-dimensional treatment planning. Med Phys 20(2 Pt 1):311–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chui CS, Mohan R (1988) Extraction of pencil beam kernels by the deconvolution method. Med Phys 15(2):138–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Niemierko A, Goitein M (1989) The use of variable grid spacing to accelerate dose calculations. Med Phys 16(3):357–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Niemierko A, Goitein M (1990) Random sampling for evaluating treatment plans. Med Phys 17(5):753–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu XQ, Chin LM (1993) Sampling techniques for the evaluation of treatment plans. Med Phys 20(1):151–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shepard DM et al. (2002) Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. Med Phys 29(6):1007–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y et al. (2002) A deterministic iterative least-squares algorithm for beam weight optimization in conformal radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 47(10):1647–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Gersem W et al. (2001) An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(3):849–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Webb S, Oldham M (1996) A method to study the characteristics of 3D dose distributions created by superposition of many intensity-modulated beams delivered via a slit aperture with multiple absorbing vanes. Phys Med Biol 41(10):2135–2153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jeraj R, Keall P (1999) Monte Carlo-based inverse treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 44(8):1885–1896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho PS, Phillips MH (2001) Reduction of computational dimensionality in inverse radiotherapy planning using sparse matrix operations. Phys Med Biol 46(5)N117–N125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thieke C et al. (2002) Acceleration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose calculation by importance sampling of the calculation matrices. Med Phys 29(5):676–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Renner WD et al. (2003) A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions. Med Phys 30(11):2996–3005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vineberg K et al. (2002) IMRT plans robust to setup error and motion: Explicit incorporation of clinical setup data using the multiple instance of geometry approximation (MIGA). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(2S):255

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leong J (1987) Implementation of random positioning error in computerised radiation treatment planning systems as a result of fractionation. Phys Med Biol 32(3):327–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beckham WA, Keall PJ, Siebers JV (2002) A fluence-convolution method to calculate radiation therapy dose distributions that incorporate random set-up error. Phys Med Biol 47(19):3465–3473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jeraj R, Keall PJ, Siebers JV (2002) The effect of dose calculation accuracy on inverse treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 47(3):391–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Siebers JV et al. (2002) Reducing dose calculation time for accurate iterative IMRT planning. Med Phys 29(2):231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ma CM et al. (2000) Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system. Phys Med Biol 45(9):2483–2495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang L, Yorke E, Chui CS (2002) Monte Carlo evaluation of 6MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments. Med Phys 29(11):2705–2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pawlicki T, Ma CM (2001) Monte Carlo simulation for MLC-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Med Dosim 26(2):157–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Laub WU, Bakai A, Nusslin F (2001) Intensity modulated irradiation of a thorax phantom: comparisons between measurements, Monte Carlo calculations and pencil beam calculations. Phys Med Biol 46(6):1695–1706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fippel M (1999) Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm. Med Phys 26(8):1466–1475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fippel M et al. (2000) Inverse treatment planning for radiation therapy based on fast Monte Carlo dose calculation. In: Monte Carlo 2000 Conference, Lisbon. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kawrakow I, Fippel M (2000) VMC++, a fast MC algorithm for Radiation Treatment planning. In: XIII International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sempau J, Bielajew AF (2000) Towards the elimination of Monte Carlo statistical fluctuation from dose volume histograms for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 45(1):131–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Deasy JO (2000) Denoising of electron beam Monte Carlo dose distributions using digital filtering techniques. Phys Med Biol 45(7):1765–1779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kawrakow I (2002) On the de-noising of Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 47(17):3087–3103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siebers, J.V. (2006). Dose Calculations for IMRT. In: Bortfeld, T., Schmidt-Ullrich, R., De Neve, W., Wazer, D.E. (eds) Image-Guided IMRT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30356-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30356-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20511-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30356-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics