13.9 Conclusion
Radiologists frequently encounter small renal masses in daily practice. Most are small benign cysts which are difficult to characterize because of their size. With modern cross-sectional imaging techniques, however, it is possible to distinguish most of these from true renal neoplasms. The small renal neoplasms that contain fat or reside within the collecting system of the kidney are easily identified and managed appropriately. The remainder of enhancing, small solid renal masses continue to be a challenge. Since their histologic make-up and biologic behavior cannot be accurately predicted by imaging, a choice of nephron-sparing surgical or percutaneous ablation techniques vs “watchful waiting” are rational options for management. The appropriate course of action depends heavily on individual patient factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abdulla C, Kalra MK, Saini S et al. (2002) Pseudoenhancement of simulated renal cysts in a phantom using different multidetector CT scanners. Am J Roentgenol 179:1473–1476
Aizawa S, Suzuki M, Kikuchi Y et al. (1987) Clinicopathological study on small renal cell carcinomas with metastases. Acta Pathol Jpn 37:947–954
Amendola MA, Bree RL, Pollack HM et al. (1988) Small renal cell carcinomas: resolving a diagnostic dilemma. Radiology 166:637–641
Bae KT, Heiken JP, Siegel CL et al. (2000) Renal cysts: Is attenuation artifactually increased on contrast-enhanced CT images? Radiology 216:792–796
Bell ET (ed) (1950) Tumors of the kidney. In: Renal diseases. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia
Bennington JL (1973) Cancer of the kidney: etiology, epidemiology, and pathology. Cancer 32:1017–1029
Bennington JL (1987) Renal adenoma. World J Urol 5:66–70
Birnbaum BA, Maki DD, Chakraborty DP et al. (2002) Renal cyst pseudoenhancement evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 225:83–90
Black WC, Ling A (1990) Is earlier diagnosis really better? The misleading effects of lead time and length time biases. Am J Roentgenol 155:625–630
Bosniak MA (1995) Observation of small incidentally detected renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 13:267–272
Bosniak MA, Rofsky NM (1996) Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 198:638–641
Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA et al. (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197:589–597
Campbell SC, Novick AC, Herts B et al. (1997) Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology 50:25–29
Curry NS (1995) Small renal masses (lesions smaller than 3 cm): imaging evaluation and management. Am J Roentgenol 164:355–362
Curry NS (2002) Imaging the small solid renal mass. Abdom Imaging 27:629–636
Curry NS, Schabel, SI, Betsill WL (1986) Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and clinical course. Radiology 158:113–117
Dechet CB, Sebo T, Farrow G et al. (1999) Prospective analysis of intraoperative frozen needle biopsy of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 162:1282–1285
Ellis WJ, Bauer KD, Oyasu R et al. (1992) Flow cytometric analysis of small renal tumors. J Urol 148:1774–1777
Eschwege P, Saussine C, Steichen B et al. (1996) Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 30 mm or less: longterm follow-up results. J Urol 155:1196–1199
Fielding JR, Visweswaran A, Silverman S et al. (1999) CT and ultrasound features of metanephric adenoma in adults with pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:441–444
Forman HP, Middleton WD, Melson GL et al. (1993) Hyperechoic renal cell carcinomas: increase in detection at US. Radiology 188:431–434
Hajdu SI, Thomas AG (1967) Renal cell carcinoma at autopsy. J Urol 97:978–982
Herts BR, Coll DM, Novick AC et al. (2002) Enhancement characteristics of papillary renal neoplasms revealed on triphasic helical CT of the kidneys. Am J Roentgenol 178:367–372
Hsu RM, Chan DY, Siegelman SS (2004) Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype. Am J Roentgenol 182:551–557
Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB et al. (1996) Small (≤3 cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology 198:785–788
Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Mukai M et al. (2000) Double-phase helical CT of small renal parenchymal neoplasms: correlation with pathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:835–842
Jinzaki M, McTavish JD, Zou KH et al. (2004) Evaluation of small (≤3 cm) renal masses with MDCT: benefits of thin overlapping reconstructions. Am J Roentgenol 183:223–228
Kim JJ, Kim TK, Han JA et al. (2004) Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans. Am J Roentgenol 178:1499–1506
Levine E, Huntrakoon M, Wetzel CH (1989) Small renal neoplasms: clinical pathologic and imaging features. Am J Roentgenol 153:69–73
Macari M, Bosniak MA (1999) Delayed CT to evaluate renal masses incidentally discovered at contrast-enhanced CT: demonstration of vascularity with deenhancement. Radiology 213:674–680
Petersen RO (1992) Kidney: neoplastic disorders. In: Petersen RO (ed) Urologic pathology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 77
Pretorius ES, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P et al. (1999) Renal neoplasms amenable to partial nephrectomy: MR imaging. Radiology 212:28–34
Reis M, Faria V, Lindoro J et al. (1988) The small cystic and noncystic noninflammatory renal nodules: a postmortem study. J Urol 140:721–723
Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T et al. (2000) The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 164:1143–1147
Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES et al. (2003) Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. Am J Roentgenol 180:1281–1287
Scialpi M, DiMaggio A, Midiri M et al. (2000) Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression. Am J Roentgenol 175:751–757
Semelka RC, Hricak H, Stevens SK et al. (1991) Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat saturation MR imaging of renal masses. Radiology 178:803–809
Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA et al. (1996) Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation. Radiology 198:785–788
Siegel CL, Fisher AJ, Bennett HF (1999) Interobserver variability in determining enhancement of renal masses on helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 172:1207–1212
Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE et al. (1994) Small (≤to 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 163:597–605
Smith SJ, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ et al. (1989) Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection. Radiology 170:699–703
Someren A, Zaatari GS, Campbell WG et al. (1989) Tumors of differentiated tubular epithelium: renal “adenoma” and adenocarcinoma. In: Someren A (ed) Urologic pathology with clinical and radiologic correlations. Macmillan, New York, pp 162–163
Steinberg AP, Lin CH, Matin S et al. (2003) Impact of tumor size on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: analysis of 163 patients (Abstract). J Urol 169 (Suppl):174a
Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altzieber S et al. (1997) Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (>3 cm) renal masses. Radiology 201:211–217
Takebayashi S, Hidai H, Chiba T et al. (1999) Using helical CT to evaluate renal cell carcinoma in patients undergoing hemodialysis: value of early enhanced images. Am J Roentgenol 172:429–433
Takebayashi S, Hidai H, Chiba T et al. (2000) Renal cell carcinoma in acquired cystic kidney disease: volume growth rate determined by helical computed tomography. Am J Kidney Dis 36:759–766
Talamo TS, Shonnard JW (1980) Small renal adenocarcinoma with metastases. J Urol 124:132–134
Tuncali K, van Sonnenberg E, Shankar S et al. (2004) Evaluation of patients referred for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: importance of a preprocedural diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 183:575–582
Urban BA, Buckley J, Soyer P et al. (1997) CT appearance of transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Am J Roentgenol 169:157–168
Volpe A, Panzarella T, Rendon RA et al. (2004) The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 100:738–745
Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L et al. (1988) Detection of renal masses: sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US and CT. Radiology 169:363–365
Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Watanabe O et al. (1992) Small renal cell carcinoma: pathologic and radiologic correlation. Radiology 184:493–498
Yuh BI, Cohan RH (1999) Detecting and characterizing renal masses during helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 173:747–755
Zagoria RJ (2000) Imaging of small renal masses: a medical success story. Am J Roentgenol 175:945–955
Zagoria RJ, Wolfman NT, Karstaedt N et al. (1990) CT features of renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on relation to tumor size. Invest Radiol 25:261–266
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curry, N.S. (2006). Small Renal Neoplasms. In: Guermazi, A. (eds) Imaging of Kidney Cancer. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30003-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30003-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21129-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30003-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)