Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Orthodontic Bonding to Wet Enamel with Water-Insensitive and Water-Activated Orthodontic Adhesive Resins

  • Chapter
Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding

Abstract

The interference of moisture in enamel bonding procedures is of interest mainly for orthodontic applications and to a lesser extent for bonded restorations. The mechanism and interfacial phenomena of enamel bonding from a restorative dentistry perspective are analyzed in Chap. 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkman PG, Süssenberger U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113:402–407

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: Wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998; 1:29–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 2000; 25:51–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Angelis M de, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:633–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Eliades G. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:13–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21:33–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katona TR, Chen J. Engineering and experimental analyses of the tensile loads applied during strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets: a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol 2000 45:461–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson K, Throckmorton GS, Buschang PH, Havasaki H. The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:689–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Braem M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G, van Doren V, Lambrechts P. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987; 5:1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of loading rate on bond strength of brackets bonded to enamel. J Orofac Orthop 2004; 65:336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophylic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod 2000; 27:181–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eliades T. Comparing bond strengths (Letter). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:13A–15A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Polymerization efficiency of chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives: degree of cure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:294–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Monomer leaching from chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:316–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moseley HC, Horrocks EN, Pearson GJ, Davies EH. Effects of cyclic stressing on attachment bond strength using glass ionomer cement and composite resin. Br J Orthod 1995; 22:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:132–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. The effect of food simulants on enamel-composite bond strength. J Orthod. 2000; 27:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishara SE, Wald L von, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:466–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999; 69:457–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122:277–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eliades T, Eliades G. Orthodontic adhesive resins. In: Brantley W A, Eliades T, eds. Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 201–21

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentin bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22:73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters WJ, Jackson RW, Smith DC. Studies of the stability and toxicity of zinc polyacrylate (polycarboxylate)cements (PAZ). J Biomed Mater Res 1974; 8:53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Turner GPA. Introduction to paint chemistry and principles of paint technology, Chapman and Hall, London, 1980

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Korbmacher H, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of a new one-phase orthodontic adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:595 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brantley WA, Eliades T, Litsky AS. Mechanics and mechanical testing of orthodontic materials. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, pp 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  33. Webster MJ, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Khajotia SS, Sinha PK. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schaneveldt S, Foley TF. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 12:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE. In vivo evaluation of two moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial: J Orthod 2003; 30:139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Karamouzos A, Mavropoulos A, Athanasiou AE, Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002; 5:170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cook WD. Polymerization defects in composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, The Netherlands, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  39. Söderholm KJ. Degradation of glass filler in experimental composites. J Dent Res 1981; 60:1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Söderholm K-J, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Söderholm K-J. Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 1993; 62:126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Söderholm, K-J. Filler systems and resin interface. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Peter Szulc, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1984, p 139

    Google Scholar 

  43. Söderholm K-J. Filler leachability during water storage of six composite materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Söderholm K-J, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75:1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Söderholm K-J. In vivo degradation mechanisms of dental resin composites. In: Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC, eds. Dental materials in vivo: aging and related phenomena. Quintessence, Chicago, 2003, pp 99–125

    Google Scholar 

  46. Eliades T, Eliades G, Bradley TG, Watts DC. Degree of cure of orthodontic adhesives with various polymerization initiation modes. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Papagiannoulis L, Tzoutzas J, Eliades G. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin degradation and wear. Dent Mater 1997; 13:305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Billmeyer FW Jr (ed) Thermosetting resins. In: Textbook of polymer science. Wiley, New York, 1984, pp 436–457

    Google Scholar 

  50. Munksgaard EC, Freud M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Freud M, Munksgaard EC. Enzymatic degradation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA polymers causing decreased microhardness and greater wear in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98:351–355

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 1996; 17:1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oonsombat C, Bishara SE, Ajlouni R. The effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with the use of a new self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123:547–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Reddy L, Marker VA, Ellis E III. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. T. Eliades
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Eliades
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Silikas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D.C. Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, 2 Thivon Street, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece

    George Eliades DDS, Dr. Dent.

  2. Biomaterials Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

    David Watts PhD, DSc, FADM

  3. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Theodore Eliades DDS, MS, Dr.Med., PhD, FADM

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eliades, T., Eliades, G., Silikas, N., Watts, D. (2005). Orthodontic Bonding to Wet Enamel with Water-Insensitive and Water-Activated Orthodontic Adhesive Resins. In: Eliades, G., Watts, D., Eliades, T. (eds) Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23408-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28559-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation