Skip to main content

What VAR Tell us about DSGE Models?

  • Chapter

Summary

We examine the consequences of extracting structural shocks in VAR models using standard standard inertial restrictions, when the data has been generated by two stochastic dynamic general equilibrium (DSGE) models featuring different types of microfundations and different sources of sluggishness. We find that, in general, misspecification is substantial: short run coefficients often have wrong signs; impulse responses and variance decompositions give misleading representations of the dynamics; inexistent puzzles are created. We show that an omitted variables bias accounts for the results and propose an alternative identification technique which can cope with the inherent underidentification displayed by the DSGE models currently used in macroeconomics.

We would like to thank Harald Uhlig, Lucrezia Reichlin, Jerome D’Adda, Morten Ravn, Vincenzo Quadrini, John Faust, David Bowman and the participants of seminars at a number of universities, conferences and summer schools for comments and suggestions. Canova acknowledges the financial support of DGYCIT grants; Pina acknowledges financial support from Sub-Programa Ciência e Tecnologia do 2 o Quadro Comunitário de Apoio. An earlier version of this paper has circulated with the title “Monetary policy misspecification in VAR models”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernanke B, Blinder A (1992) The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review 82: 901–921

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernanke B, Mihov I (1998) Measuring monetary policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 869–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanchard O, Quah D (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79: 655–673

    Google Scholar 

  4. Canova F, De Nicoló G (2002) Monetary disturbances matter for output for business fluctuations in the G-7. Journal Of Monetary Economics 49: 1131–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chari VV, Kehoe P, McGrattan E (2000) Sticky price models of the business cycle: Can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem? Econometrica 68: 1151–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiano L (1991) Modelling the liquidity effect of a monetary shock. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review Winter: 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christiano L, Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1997) Sticky price and limited participation models of money: A comparison. European Economic Review 41: 1201–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiano L, Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1999) Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end. In Taylor J, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics. Elsevier Science

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooley T, Leroy S (1985) Atheoretical macroeconomics: A critique. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 283–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooley T, Dwyer M (1995) Business cycle analysis without much theory: A look at structural VARs. Journal of Econometrics 83: 57–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooley T, Quadrini V (1997) Monetary policy and financial decision of the firms. UPF Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erceg C, Henderson D, Levin A (2000) Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 281–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farmer R (2000) Two theories of sticky prices. Journal of Macroeconomic Dynamics 4: 1–34

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Faust J (1998) The robustness of identified VAR conclusions about money. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series 49: 207–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faust J, Leeper E (1997) When do long run identifying restrictions give reliable results? Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15: 345–353

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen L, Sargent T (1991) Two difficulties in interpreting vector autoregressions. In Hansen L, Sargent T (eds) Rational expectations econometrics. Boulder Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman M, Schwartz A (1960) A monetary history of United States. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon R, Leeper E (1994) The dynamic impact of monetary policy: An exercise in tentative identification. Journal of Political Economy 102: 1228–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leeper E, Gordon (1992) In search for a liquidity effect. Journal of Monetary Economics: 341–370.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lucas R (1990) Liquidity and interest rates. Journal of Economic Theory 50: 237–264

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Neiss K, Pappa E (2003) Output persistence without too much stickiness. Review of Economic Dynamics forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rotemberg J, Woodford M (1997) An optimization-based econometric framework for the evaluation of monetary policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12: 298–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudebusch G (1998) Do measures of monetary policy in a VAR make sense? International Economic Review 39: 907–948 (with discussion and reply)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sargent T (1984) Autoregression, expectations, advice. American Economic Review 74: 408–415

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sims C (1980) A comparison of interwar and postwar business cycles: Monetarism reconsidered. American Economic Review 70: 250–257

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sims C (1992) Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review 36: 975–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sims C (1998) Comment on G. Rudebusch’s Do measures of monetary policy in a VAR make sense? International Economic Review 39: 933–941

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sims C and Zha T (1996) Does monetary policy generate recessions? Manuscript, Yale University

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sims C and Zha T (1999) Error bands for impulse responses. Econometrica 67: 1113–1165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor J (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Uhlig H (1999) A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily. In Marimon R, Scott A (eds) Computational methods for the study of dynamic economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  32. Uhlig H (1999) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure. Center working paper 9928, Tilburg University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Canova, F., Pina, J.P. (2005). What VAR Tell us about DSGE Models?. In: Diebolt, C., Kyrtsou, C. (eds) New Trends in Macroeconomics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28556-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics