Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Information Sources
Codex Alimentarius. Homepage, including minutes of all their meetings, can be found at http://www.codexalimentarius.net/agend.htm
Co-existence. A number of European Commission articles and links on this issue can be obtained under http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/risk
European Parliament and Council (2001) Off J Europ Commun L106:1
European Parliament and Council (2003) Off J Europ Commun L268:1
Labelling issues. US views on food labelling can be obtained at http://www.usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/0502/ijee/foodlabeling.htm#mat
Noussair C, Robin S, Ruffieux B (2002) Do consumers not care about biotech foods or do they just not read the labels? Econ Lett 75(1):47–53, http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/sae/econworld/econbase/ecolet/frame.htm
Public perception of GMOs. See http://www.checkbiotech.org/pdf/pubperc.pdf
Refer also to information sources listed in Sect. 3.3.
Reiss M (2002) Labelling GM foods — the ethical way forward. Nature Biotechnol 20(9):868 USDA. Homepage is a good source of information on GM crop usage http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/biotechnology/chapter1.htm
Douma WT (2003) The precautionary principle: its application in international, European and Dutch law. TMC Asser Institute, The Netherlands
CCGP-Codex Committee on General Principles (2000) EU positions paper for Codex Alimentarius. The position paper can be downloaded from http://www.Eur-lexen/com/index.html
European Commission's Communication on the Precautionary Principle COM (2000) 1. The communication can be downloaded from http://www.Eurlex/en/com/index.html
European Environment Agency (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental issue report No.22
Foster KN et al. (2000) Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288:979–981
Kriebel D et al. (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Persp 109:871–876
Tait J (2001) More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk refutation of genetically modified crops. J Risk Res 4:175–189
von Schomberg R (2000) Agricultural biotechnology in the trade-environment interface: counterbalancing adverse effects of globalization. In: Barben D (ed) Biotechnologie-Globalisierung-Demokratie. Edition Sigma, Berlin
Eurobarometer 51.1 (1999) Europeans and the Environment. Conducted between April and May 1999, published in September 1999. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg10/epo/eb.html
Eurobarometer 52.1 (2000) Europeans and Biotechnology. Conducted between November and December 1999, published in March 2000. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgl0/epo/eb.html
Eurobarometer 55.2 (2001) Europeans, science and technology. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb55/eb55_en.htm
Eurobarometer 58 (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb58/eb58_en.htm
Kamaldeen S, Powell DA (2000) Public perceptions of biotechnology. Food Safety Technical Report no 17. The report is obtainable at: http://www.foodsafetynetwork.ca/ge.htm#public
Marris C (2001) PABE Report: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports 21:545–548
Belton PS, Belton T (eds) (2003) Food, science and society: exploring the gap between expert advice and individual behaviour. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Eurobarometer 58.0 (2002) Europeans and Biotechnology. Final Report to the EC-DC Research Project LSES
Fjaestad B (2001) Why journalists report science as they do. Proceedings Communication Strategies in Biotechnology, Athens-NHRF
Gaskell G et al. (2000) Biotechnology and the European public. Nature Biotechnol 18:935–938
Gaskell G, Bauer M, Durant J (eds) (2002) Biotechnology: the making of a global controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Marks LA, Kalaitzandonakes N (2001) Mass media communications about agrobiotechnology. AgBio Forum 4:199–208
Marris C (2001) Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. EMBO reports 21:545–548
Marris C, Wynne B, Simmons P, Weldon S (2000) Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnologies in Europe (Final report of the PABE-EC-FAIR). Commission of European Communities, Brussels
Science Museum, London (eds)(l999) Biotechnology in the public sphere. Science Museum, London
Science Museum, London (eds)(2001) Biotechnology: the years of controversy. Science Museum, London
Torgersen H (2001) Remarks on scientists' communication to the public. Proceedings Communication Strategies in Biotechnology, Athens-NHRF
Blaine K, Powell D (2001) Communication of food-related risks. AgBio Forum 4:179–185. The article can be downloaded from: http://www.agbioforum.org
EFOST (2001) Report: What is Risk Analysis? EFOST, Ankara
European Federation of Biotechnology (2003) Who should communicate with the public and how? Report of the focus workshops. European Federation of Biotechnology, Delft
OECD (2000) Emerging Systemic Risks: First Meeting of the Steering Group. Summary of the Discussion and Conclusion. Minutes 90377. OECD, Paris
Renn O et al. (2002) Systemic risks: report to the OECD. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart
Thompson PB (2003) Value judgements and risk comparisons. The case of genetically engineered crops. Plant Physiol 132:10–16
Council of Europe Steering Committee on Bioethics. The committee deals with a wide range of ethical issues related to science. More information can be found at http://www.con-ventions.coe.int
European Commission. The European group on ethics in science and new technologies to the European Commission. http://www.europe.eu.int/comm/european_group_ethics
Food Ethics Council (1999) Novel foods: beyond Nuffield (second report of the UK Food Ethics Council). Food Ethics Council, Brighton, UK
Heaf D, Wirz J (2001) Intrinsic value and integrity of plants in the context of genetic engineering (Proceedings of an Ifgene workshop on 9–11 May 2001). Ifgene, Dornach, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.anth.org/ifgene/papersMay2001.htm
Mepham B (ed) (1996) Food ethics. Routledge, London, pp 101–119
Reiss MJ, Straughan R (1996) Improving nature? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Socio-Economic Considerations. In: Genes on the Menu. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27136-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27136-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20178-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27136-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)