Abstract
The energy balance approach is used for a statistical assessment of CHAMP orbits, data and gravity models. It is known that the quality of GPS-derived orbits varies and that CHAMP accelerometer errors are difficult to model. The stochastic model of the in-situ potential values from the energy balance is therefore heterogeneous and it is unclear if it can be described accurately using a priori information. We have estimated parameters of this stochastic model in an iterative variance-component estimation procedure, combined with an outlier rejection method. This means we solve simultaneously for a spherical harmonic model, for polynomial coefficients absorbing accelerometer drift, for sub-daily noise variance components, and for a variance parameter that controls the influence of an a-priori gravity model (EGM96). We develop here, for the first time, a fast Monte Carlo variant of the Minimum Norm Quadratic Unbiased Estimator (MINQUE) as an alternative for the fast Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood VCE that we have introduced earlier. In this way, spurious data sets could be indicated and downweighted in the least-squares estimation of the unknown parameters. Using only 299 days of CHAMP kinematic orbit data, the quality of the estimated global gravity model was found com-parable to the EIGEN-3P model. Monte Carlo Variance Components Estimation appears to be a valid method to estimate the stochastic model of satellite gravity data and thus improves the least squares solution considerably.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gerlach C, Földvary L, Švehla D, Gruber Th, Wermuth M, Sneeuw N, Frommknecht B, Oberndorfer H, Peters Th, Rothacher M, Rummel R, Steigenberger P (2003). A CHAMP-only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral GRL 30(20), 2037, doi:10.1029/2003GL018025
Grafarend EG, Schaffrin B (1993) Ausgleichungsrechnung in linearen Modellen. BI Verlag, Mannheim
Howe E, Stenseng L, Tscherning CC (2003) Analysis of one month of state vector and accelerometer data for the recovery of the gravity potential. Adv Geosciences 1:1–4.
Jekeli C (1999) The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Cel Mech Dyn Astr 75: 85–100.
Koch K-R, Kusche J (2002) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J Geodesy 76: 259–268.
Kusche J (2003) A Monte-Carlo technique for weight estimation in satellite geodesy. J Geodesy 76: 641–652.
Kusche J, van Loon JP (2004) Statistical assessment of CHAMP data and models using the energy balance approach., in Reigber et al., Earth observation with CHAMP, results from three years in orbit, Springer.
Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olsen TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, NASA-GSFC, Greenbelt MD
Löcher A, Ilk KH (2004) Energy balance relations for validation of gravity field models and orbit determination, in Reigber et al., Earth observation with CHAMP, results from three years in orbit, Springer.
Lucas JR (1985) A variance component estimation method for sparse matrix applications NOAA Technical Report NOS 111 NGS 33, National Geodetic Survey, Rockville
Mayer-Gürr T, Ilk KH, Eicker A, Feuchtinger M (in press) ITG-CHAMP01: A CHAMP gravitiy field model from short kinematical arcs of a one-year observation period, accepted for J Geodesy
Rao CR, Kleffe J (1988) Estimation of variance components and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Ray RD (1999) A global ocean tide model from TOPEX / POSEIDON altimetry: GOT99.2, NASA/TM-1999-209478, NASA-GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, König R, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY EIGEN gravity field model to degree and order 150 from GRACE Mission data only, submitted to Journal of Geodynamics.
Reigber C, Jochman H, Wünsch J, Petrovic S, Schwintzer P, Barthelmes F, Neumayer K-H, König R, Förste C, Balmino G, Biancale R, Lemoine J-M, Loyer S, Perosanz F (2004) Earth gravity field and seasonal variability from CHAMP, in Reigber et al., Earth Observation with CHAMP, results from three years in orbit, Springer.
Švehla D, Rothacher M (2003) Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters. Adv Geosciences 1: 47–56.
Sjöberg LE (1983) Unbiased estimation of variance-covariance components in condition adjustment with unknowns-A MINQUE approach. Zeitschrift fur Vermessungswesen 108:9, p. 382–387
Visser P, Sneeuw N, Gerlach C (2003) Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates. J Geodesy 77: 207–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Loon, J., Kusche, J. (2005). Stochastic model validation of satellite gravity data: A test with CHAMP pseudo-observations. In: Jekeli, C., Bastos, L., Fernandes, J. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26930-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26932-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)