Skip to main content

Präoperative Diagnostik und gängige internationale Defektklassifikation

  • Chapter
Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks
  • 529 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bettin D, Katthagen BD (1997) The German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135(4): 281–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhry RR, Rice RP, Triffitt PD, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (1992) Plasma viscosity and C-reactive protein after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74(4): 523–524

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corstens FH, Meer JW van der (1999) Nuclear medicine's role in infection and inflammation. Lancet 354: 765–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Courpied JP, Migaud H (2000) Reprise fémorale dans les arthroplasties itératives aseptiques de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot [Suppl I] 86: 33–90

    Google Scholar 

  5. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296: 133–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elke R (2001) Die Schaftrevision. Klassifikation und Behandlung. Orthopäde 30(5): 280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelbrecht E, Siegel A (1989) Complications following hip joint prosthesis. Radiologe 29(10): 508–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mattingly D, McCarthy J, Bierbaum BE, Chandler HP, Turner RH, Cameron HU, McTighe T (1991) Revising the deficient proximal femur. Scientific Exhibition, 59th AAOS Meeting, edited, 1–11, Anaheim/USA, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, (295): 172–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paprosky WG (1992) The use of femoral strut grafts in cementless revision arthroplasty. Bone Implant Grafting. Edited by Older. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, pp 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanzen L, Carlsson AS (1989) The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in infected total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71(4): 638–641

    Google Scholar 

  12. White J, Kelly M, Dunsmuir R (1998) C-reactive protein level after total hip and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80(5): 909–911

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elke, R. (2005). Präoperative Diagnostik und gängige internationale Defektklassifikation. In: Thümler, P., Forst, R., Zeiler, G. (eds) Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26803-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics