Abstract
A revolution in radiography has occurred in the last three decades; digital radiography has replaced screen-film radiography. To understand digital radiography, one must begin with the fundamental principles, which have not changed since Roentgen’s time. The conversion of X-rays into a visible image, however, has changed from screen-film to digital radiography. A discussion on the characteristics of digital radiography and its most common forms, computed radiography (CR) and digital flat-panel radiography follows. The fundamentals of digital image processing are discussed, including preprocessing, latitude reduction, and contrast modification. Advanced technologies are also described, including structured phosphors, slot scanners, dual-sided CR, irradiation side sampling flat panels, and gaseous avalanche detectors. The potential application of dual energy subtraction radiography and tomosynthesis to pediatric thoracic radiography is also considered. The chapter concludes with a discussion on radiation dose optimization in pediatric chest radiography including the newest standards for exposure indicators, dose area product, dose reporting, and informatics initiatives to support dose reporting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some older systems report “EAP”, or “Exposure Area Product” in traditional units of Roentgen times distance squared.
References
AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging. PP-25. 12/13/2011 http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=318&type=PP¤t=true Accessed 29 April 2013
Cohen MD, Long B, Cory DA, Broderick NJ, Smith JA (1989) Digital imaging of the newborn chest. Clin Radiol 40:365–368
Cohen MD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, White SJ, Smith JA, Long B (1991) Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns. Radiology 181(3):829–832
Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron MC, Parent S (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine 35:989–994
Després P, Beaudoin G, Gravel P, de Guise JA (2005) Physical characteristics of a low-dose gas microstrip detector for orthopedic x-ray imaging. Med Phys 32(4):1193–1204
Don S, Whiting BR, Rutz LJ, Apgar BK (2012) New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists. Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1337–1341. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8678
Don S, Macdougall R, Strauss K, Moore QT, Goske MJ, Cohen M, Herrmann T, John SD, Noble L, Morrison G, Lehman L, Whiting BR (2013) Image gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography. Am J Roentgenol 200(5):W431–W436. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9895
Heller RM, Erickson JJ, Price RR (1982) Pediatric non-angiographic applications of digital radiography. In: Price RR, Rollo FD, Mo-nahan WG, James AE Jr (eds) Digital radiography: a focus on clinical utility. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 267–277
Kogutt MS, Jones JP, Perkins DD (1988) Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging. Am J Roentgenol 151:775–779
Kroft LJM, Geleijns J, Mertens BJA, Veldkamp WJH, Zonderland HM (2004) Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. Radiol 231(1):156–163
Kroft LJM, Veldkamp WJH, Mertens BJA, Boot MV, Geleijns J (2005) Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease. Am J Roentgenol 185:339–346
Kushner DC (1983) Scanning beam low dose digital radiography: initial clinical trials relevant to pediatric radiology [abstr]. Am J Roentgenol 141:847
Leblans P, Struye L, Willems P (2000) A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector. J Digit Imaging 13(2)Suppl 0031:117–120
Liu X, Shaw CC, Lai CJ, Altunbasa MC, Chen L, Han T, Wang T (2008) Scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of a slot-scan digital chest radiography system with electronic aft-collimation: a chest phantom study. Med Phys 35(6):2391–2402
Luckey GW (1975) Apparatus and method for producing images corresponding to patterns of high-energy radiation. US Patent 3,859,527, 01 Jan 1975
Medical electrical equipment—Exposure index of digital X-ray imaging systems—Part 1: Definitions and requirements for general radiography, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), international standard 62494-1-08 Geneva, Switzerland, 2008
Merlo L, Bighi S, Cervi PM, Lupi L (1991) Computed radiography in neonatal intensive care. Pediatr Radiol 21:94–96
Rowlands JA (2002) The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol 47:R123–R166
Romlein J (2007) CR versus DR? Blurred lines of distinction. Applied Radiol December Suppl:8–10
Samei E, Saunders RS, Lo JY, Dobbins JT III, Jesneck JL, Floyd CE, Ravin CE (2004) Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. Med Phys 31(9):2687–2698
Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U, Venema HW, Uffmann M, Prokop M (2008) Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality. Eur Radiol 18:1818–1830
Seibert JA (2007) Digital radiography: CR versus DR? Time to reconsider the options, the definitions, and the current capabilities. Applied Radiol December Suppl:4–7
Seibert JA, Morin RL (2011) The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol 41:573–581
Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M, Gingold E, Goldman L, Krugh K, Leong DL, Mah E, Ogden K, Peck D, Samei E, Wang J, Willis CE (2009) An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (Executive Summary). Med Phys 36(7):2898–2914
Tarver RD, Cohen M, Broderick NJ, Conces DJ Jr (1990) Pediatric digital chest imaging. J Thorac Imaging 5(1):31–35
Uffmann M, Prokop M, Eisenhuber E, Fuchsjager M, Weber M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lesions. Invest Radiol 40(5):249–256
Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2009) Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 72(2):202–208
Vastagh S (2011) Statement by MITA on behalf of the MITA CR-DR group of the X-ray section. Pediatr Radiol 41:566. doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1961-7
Vult von Steyern K, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Bozovic G, Wiklund M, Geijer M (2012) Description and validation of a scoring system for tomosynthesis in pulmonary cystic fibrosis. Eur Radiol 22:2718–2728
Willis CE (2002) Computed radiography: a higher dose? Pediatr Radiol 32:745–750
Willis CE (2008) Digital radiography: CR versus DR? Sometimes recognizing the distinction in technologies makes a difference. Applied Radiol January:25–28
Willis CE (2009) Optimizing digital radiography of children. Eur J Radiol 72(2):266–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Willis, C.E., Don, S. (2013). Advances in Chest Radiography Techniques: CR, DR, Tomosynthesis, and Radiation Dose Optimization. In: Garcia-Peña, P., Guillerman, R. (eds) Pediatric Chest Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2013_938
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2013_938
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37336-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37337-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)