Skip to main content

Gravity Field Mapping from GRACE: Different Approaches—Same Results?

  • Conference paper
VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 142))

Abstract

GFZ as part of the GRACE Science Data System (SDS) is routinely processing time-variable global gravity field models on monthly and weekly basis throughout the whole GRACE mission period. These operational products consist of spherical harmonic coefficients which are calculated based on the so-called dynamic method, i.e. integration of variational equations. As a matter of fact, these coefficients are imperfect due to different error sources such as inaccurate background models, instrument noise and inhomogeneous sampling and thus have to be filtered during post-processing in an appropriate way. Nevertheless, the current release named GFZ RL05 shows significant improvements compared to its precursors with an average error level of only about a factor of 6 above the pre-launch estimated baseline accuracy.

Additionally, an alternative approach using radial basis functions is developed at GFZ. This approach is based on the inversion of integral equations using gradient differences as in-situ observations. The resulting gravity field products can be directly derived as gridded data making this approach also suitable for regional applications. No post-filtering is necessary, as regularization is already applied during system inversion. Additionally applying a Kalman filter, higher temporal resolution can be achieved.

This paper gives a brief overview of the methodology of both approaches and their particular strengths and weaknesses are discussed. Results from GFZ RL05 and the latest results of the radial basis function approach are compared and also validated against independent data sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bettadpur S (2012) UTCSR level-2 processing standards document (for level-2 product release 0005). GRACE document 327–742. ftp://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/allData/grace/docs/. Accessed 31 July 2013

  • Bruinsma SL, Lemoine J-M, Biancale R, Valès N (2010) CNES/GRGS 10-day gravity field models (release 02) and their evaluation. Adv Space Res 45:587–601. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2009.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahle C, Flechtner F, Gruber C, König D, König R, Michalak G, Neumayer KH (2012) GFZ GRACE level-2 processing standards document for level-2 product release 0005. Scientific Technical Report STR12/02 - Data, Revised Edition, January 2013, Potsdam, 21 p. doi:10.2312/GFZ.b103-1202-25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahle C, Flechtner F, Gruber C, König D, König R, Michalak G, Neumayer KH (2014) GFZ RL05: An Improved Time-Series of Monthly GRACE Gravity Field Solutions. In: Flechtner F et al (eds) Observation of the system earth from space – CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Future Missions, Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_4

    Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270:105–134. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00283-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flechtner F, Dobslaw H, Fagiolini E (2014) AOD1B Product Description Document for Product Releases 05 (Rev. 4.2). GRACE Document 327–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber C, Moon Y, Flechtner F, Dahle C, Novák P, König R, Neumayer KH (2014) Submonthly GRACE Solutions from Localizing Integral Equations and Kalman Filtering. In: Rizos C and Willis P (eds) Earth on the edge: science for a sustainable planet, international association of geodesy symposia, vol 139. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (2000) Simulation study of a low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtenbach E, Mayer-Gürr T, Eicker A (2009) Deriving daily snapshots of the Earth’s gravity field from GRACE L1B data using Kalman filtering. Geophys Res Lett 36:L17102. doi:10.1029/2009GL039564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusche J, Schmidt R, Petrovic S, Rietbroek R (2009) Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model. J Geodesy 83:903–913. doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0308-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Ditmar P, Siemes C, Slobbe DC, Revtova E, Klees R, Riva R, Zhao Q (2010) DEOS Mass Transport model (DMT-1) based on GRACE satellite data: methodology and validation. Geophys J Int 181:769–788. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04533.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Gürr T (2006) Gravitationsfeldbestimmung aus der Analyse kurzer Bahnbögen am Beispiel der Satellitenmissionen CHAMP und GRACE. Dissertation, University of Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer U, Jäggi A, Beutler G (2012) Monthly gravity field solutions based on GRACE observations generated with the celestial mechanics approach. Earth Planet Sci Lett 345:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer U, Dahle C, Sneeuw N, Jäggi A, Beutler G, Bock H (2015) The effect of pseudo-stochastic orbit parameters on GRACE montly gravity fields – insights from lumped coefficents. Submitted to international association of geodesy symposia, VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák P (2007) Integral inversion of SST data of type GRACE. Stud Geophys Geod 51:351–367. doi:10.1007/s11200-007-0020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, König R, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY (2005) An earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S. J Geodyn 39:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel R (1975) Downward continuation of gravity information from satellite to satellite tracking or satellite gradiometry in local areas. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science, vol 221. Ohio State University, Columbus, 50 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R (2007) Zur Bestimmung des cm-Geoids und dessen zeitlicher Variationen mit GRACE. Dissertation, Scientific Technical Report STR07/04, April 2007, Potsdam, 141 p. doi:10.2312/GFZ.b103-07042

    Google Scholar 

  • Shako R, Förste C, Abrikosov O, Bruinsma SL, Marty J-C, Lemoine J-M, Flechtner F, Neumayer KH, Dahle C (2014) EIGEN-6C: A High-Resolution Global Gravity Combination Model Including GOCE Data. In: Flechtner F et al (eds) Observation of the system earth from space – CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and Future Missions, Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_20

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U, Lutz S, Dach R (2011) CODE contribution to the first IGS reprocessing campaign. Technical Report 1/2011, Institute for Astronomical and Physical Geodesy (IAPG), Technical University of Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09607. doi:10.1029/2004GL019920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesmer V, Steigenberger P, van Dam T, Mayer-Gürr T (2011) Vertical deformations from homogeneously processed GRACE and global GPS long-term series. J Geodesy 85:291–310. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0437-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins M, Yuan DN (2012) JPL level-2 processing standards document for level-2 product release 05. GRACE document 327–744. ftp://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/allData/grace/docs/. Accessed 31 July 2013

  • Werth S, Güntner A, Petrovic S, Schmidt R (2009) Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 277:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with support code 03F0654A.

We would like to thank the German Space Operations Center (GSOC) of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) for providing continuously and nearly 100% of the raw telemetry data of the twin GRACE satellites.

We would also like to thank the editor, M. Weigelt, as well as U. Meyer and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments improving this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Dahle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dahle, C., Gruber, C., Fagiolini, E., Flechtner, F. (2015). Gravity Field Mapping from GRACE: Different Approaches—Same Results?. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics