Skip to main content

Simplifying the Manager Competency Model by Using the Rough Set Approach

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing (RSFDGrC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3642))

Abstract

It is now a leading company strategy to apply competency models for identifying and developing capabilities of their managers. However, a competency model usually contains too many intended competencies to be implemented. Recently, some scholars and experts argue that eight is the maximum for managers to assess. Hence, how to simplify the manager competency model is becoming an important issue. Well known as data mining techniques, the rough sets theory is a relatively new approach and good at data reduction in qualitative analysis, so that the rough set approach is suitable for dealing with the qualitative problem in simplifying the competency model. The aim of this paper is to mining the minimal set of competencies through using the rough set approach to help companies for better utilizing the competency model. The results show that the “self-management” competency is the most indispensable portion to a manager competency model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athey, T.R., Orth, M.S.: Emerging Competency Methods for the Future. Human Resource Management 38(3), 215–226 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beynon, M.J., Peel, M.J.: Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction. Omega: International Journal of Management Science 29(6), 561–576 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyatzis, R.E.: The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curry, B.: Rough sets: current and future developments. The International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks 20(5), 247–250 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitras, A.I., Slowinski, R., Susmaga, R., Zopounidis, C.: Business failure prediction using rough sets. European Journal of Operational Research 114(2), 263–280 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dive, B.: Education Management. New Zealand Management, Auckland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Rough Sets and Multivariate Statistical Classification: A Simulation Study. Computational Economics 19(3), 287–301 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. In: Slowinski, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, pp. 203–232. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goh, C., Law, R.: Incorporating the rough sets theory into travel demand analysis. Tourism Management 24(5), 511–517 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: A new rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk. In: Zopounidis, C. (ed.) Operational Tools in the Management of Financial Risks, pp. 121–136. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. European Journal of Operational Research 138(2), 247–259 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E., Slocum, J.W.: Management: A Competency-Based Approach. South-Western College Pub, Cincinnati (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Style Competency Study Group: A Proposal for Japanese Style Competency Model. Tokyo: Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. JPC-SED: The Fifth Survey on Changes in the Japanese-style Personnel System. Tokyo: Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelner, S.P.: A Few Thoughts on Executive Competency Convergence. Center for Quality of Management Journal 10(1), 67–72 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Krusinska, E., Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, J.: Discriminat versus rough set approach to vague data analysis. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 8(1), 43–56 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansfield, R.S.: Building Competency Models: Approaches for HR Professionals. Human Resource Management 35(1), 7–18 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McClelland, D.C.: Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist 28(1), 1–24 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mi, J.S., Wu, W.Z., Zhang, W.X.: Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model. Information Sciences 159(3-4), 255–272 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirable, R.: Everything You Wanted to Know About Competency Modeling. Training and Development 51(8), 73–77 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mori, N., Tanaka, H., Inoue, K.: Rough sets and KANSEI: knowledge acquisition and reasoning from KANSEI data. Kaibundo, Japan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Classification. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 20(5), 469–483 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. In: Lin, T.Y., Cercone, N. (eds.) Rough Sets and Data Mining: Analysis for Imprecise Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets, decision algorithms and Bayes’ theorem. European Journal of Operational Research 136(1), 181–189 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., Syndey, F.: Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review 74(2), 71–80 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez, D., Patel, R., Bright, A., Gregory, D., Gowing, M.K.: Developing Competency Models to Promote Integrated Human Resource. Human Resource Management 41(3), 309–324 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoonover, S.C., Schoonover, H., Nemerov, D., Ehly, C.: Competency-Based HR Applications: Results of a Comprehensive Survey. Andersen/Schoonover/SHRM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sinnott, G.C., Madison, G.H., Pataki, G.E.: Competencies: Report of the Competencies Workgroup, Workforce and Succession Planning Work Groups. New York State Governor’s Office of Employee Relations and the Department of Civil Service (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skowron, A., Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: From the rough set theory to the evidence theory. In: Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 295–305. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Slowinski, R., Zopounidis, C.: Application of the rough set approach to evaluation of bankruptcy risk. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 4(1), 27–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spencer, L.M., Spencer, S.M.: Competence at work: Model for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tay, F.E.H., Shen, L.: Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model. European Journal of Operational Research 141(3), 641–659 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Walczak, B., Massart, D.: Rough sets theory. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 47(1), 1–16 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Y.F.: Mining stock price using fuzzy rough set system. Expert Systems with Applications 24(1), 13–23 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Works Institute: What is the competency? Works. 57 (1), 1-47, Japan, Recruit (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, WW., Lee, YT., Tzeng, GH. (2005). Simplifying the Manager Competency Model by Using the Rough Set Approach. In: Ślęzak, D., Yao, J., Peters, J.F., Ziarko, W., Hu, X. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. RSFDGrC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3642. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11548706_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11548706_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28660-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31824-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics