Skip to main content

Anorectal Ultrasound

  • Chapter
Book cover Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
  • 953 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:349–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen MB, Pederson JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: Findings in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157(6):1199–1202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett SJD, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:465–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zetterstrom JP, Mellgren A, Madoff RD, Kim DG, Wong WD. Perineal body measurement improves evaluation of anterior sphincter lesions during endoanal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:705–713.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Auwerda HJ, Bac DJ, Wallenburg HC. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: relationship of anal endosonography and manometry to anorectal complaints. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1004–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnett SJD, Speakman CTM, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991;78:448–450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R, Morkrid L, Aasen AO, Bergan A. The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:42–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sentovich SM, Wong WD, Blatchford GJ. Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1000–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:434–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover JMA. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:752–755.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho DY. Endosonographic criteria for an internal opening of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:515–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991;78:445–447.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang YK, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, et al. The role of anal ultrasound in the assessment of benign anorectal disease. Coloproctology 1993;5:260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheong DMO, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1158–1160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1147–1152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sudol-Szopinska I, Gesla J, Jakubowski W, Noszczyk W, Szczepkowsi M, Sarti D. Reliability of endosonography in evaluation of anal fistulae and abscesses. Acta Radiol 2002;43:599–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yee LF, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Use of endoanal ultrasound in patients with rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1057–1064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH, et al. Evaluation of perianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:254–260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F, Panuel M, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC. Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 1999;86:1093–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Christiansen J, Bruun E, Skjoldbye B, Hagen K. Chronic idiopathic anal pain: analysis of ultrasonography, pathology, and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:661–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarantino D, Bernstein MA. Endoanal ultrasound in the staging and management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: potential implications of a new ultrasound staging system. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magdeburg B, Fried M, Meyenberger C. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of anal carcinomas. Endoscopy 1999;31:359–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Vaginal endosonography: new approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1296–1299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, et al. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:239–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, MacIver DK, Ward HC. High-resolution MR imaging of the anal sphincter in children: a pilot study using endoanal receiver coils. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:201–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. deSouza NM, Puni R, Kmiot WA, Bartram CI, Hall AS, Bydder GM. MRI of the anal sphincter. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:745–751.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schutte HE, Lameris JS. Imaging of the anorectal region. Eur J Radiol 1996;22:116–122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Strohbehn K, Ellis JH, Strohbehn JA, DeLancey JO. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:277–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, Krausz T. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearance in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1465–1471.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nogueras, J.J. (2006). Anorectal Ultrasound. In: Davila, G.W., Ghoniem, G.M., Wexner, S.D. (eds) Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-010-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-010-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-730-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-010-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics