Abstract
In this paper we apply Davis’ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in a qualitative fashion to analyze and interpret the chronological sequence of events leading to the acceptance of the Groupware technology, BSCW, in a virtual learning team. The research question investigated is: What are the factors influencing the integration process of Groupware technology in virtual learning teams in part-time adult education? The data were gathered through an in-depth qualitative action research study of one virtual learning team doing problem-oriented project work within a master education program. We find that one important factor influencing the integration process of Groupware is: How the technology provides support for social perspective awareness. In the case investigated the technology BSCW supported social awareness, which influenced both the ease-of-use and the perceived-usefulness of the Groupware technology, thus being an important condition that influenced the positive outcome of the integration process.
Chapter PDF
References
Adams, D. Nelson, R. and Todd, P. (1992): Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly, (16,2), July, 1992, pp. 227–247.
Alexander, P.M. (2002): Teamwork, Time, Trust and Information, in Proceedings of SAICSIT 2002. pp 65–74.
Avison, David; Francis Lau, Michael Myers and Peter Axel Nielsen: Action Research, in Communication of the ACM, January 1999, Vol. 42,No. 1
Bentley, R. T., T. Horstmann, and J. Trevor: The World Wide Web as enabling technology for CSCW: The case of BSCW, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 6,no. 2–3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 111–134
Bjørn, P. (2003): Re-Negotiating Protocols: A Way To Integrate GroupWare in Collaborative Learning Settings, Proceedings of European Conference in Information Systems (ECIS), Naples, 2003.
Bødker, K., Kensing, F. and Simonsen, J. (2003): Professional IT design — the foundation for sustainable IT usage, Forthcoming MIT Press.
Braa, K. and Vidgen, R. (2000): Research — From observation to intervention, Ch. 12 in Planet Internet. K. Braa, C. Sørensen, B. Dahlbom (eds.), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.
Carstensen, P. and Sørensen, C. (1996): From the social to the systematic: Mechanisms supporting coordination in design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5,no. 4, 1996, pp. 387–413.
Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990): Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 1990.
Cheesman, Robin og Simon B. Heilesen: Supporting Problem-based Learning in Groups in a Net Enviroment, In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadly & J. Roschelle (Eds.) Dec. 12–15, Standford University, Palo Alto, California. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J.W. (1998), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Sage Publications.
Davis, F. (1989): Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, (13,3), September, 1989, pp. 319–340.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, (35,6), August 1989, pp. 982–1003.
Davison, R., Qureshi, S., Vreede, G-J. d., Vogel, D. and Jones, N.: Group Support Systems through the Lens of Action Research: Cases in Organizations, Journal of Global IT Management, 3,4, 6–23, 2000.
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, Lone og Elsebeth K. Sorensen: Distributed Computer Supported Collaborative Learning through shared Practice and Social Participation, In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadly & J. Roschelle (Eds.) Dec. 12–-15, Standford University, Palo Alto, California. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Donnellan, B. (2003) Knowledge Management Systems Implementation to Support New Product Development, Unpublished Phd Dissertation, University of Limerick.
Dourish, Paul and Bly, Sara (1992): Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group, In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennet and G. Lynch (eds.): CHI’92 Conference Proceedings: ACM Conferences on human factors in computing systems, 3–7 May 1992, Montercy, California, New York: ACM press. pp. 541–577.
Gefen D., Karahanna, E. and D.W. Straub (2003): Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model, MIS Quarterly 27,No. 1, pp 51–90.
Grinter, R. E. and Eldridge, M. A. (2001): y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?, In Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 16–20 September 2001, Bonn, Germany, pp. 219–238, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 2001
Grudin, J. (1994): Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 37,No. 1, 1994, pp. 92–105
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L.; Knoll, Kathleen and Leidner, Dorothy E. (1998): Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Journal of Management Information Systems; Spring 1998; 14,4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 29
Karsten, H.: Collaboration and Collaborative Information Technologies: A Review of the Evidens, The DATA BASE for advances in Information Systems, Vol. 30,No. 2, 1999.
Kayworth T. R., and Leidner, D.E. (2002): Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, Winther 2001–2002, Vol. 18,No. 3, pp 7–40.
Koufaris, M. (2002): Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13,No. 2, pp. 205–223.
Kvale, S. (1996): InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage, 1996.
Kwon, H.S., Chidambaram, L. (2000): A Test of Technology Acceptance Model, The Case of Cellular Telephone Adoption, Proceedings of the 33 rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society.
Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P., Zhuang, Y.( 2000): The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29,No. 3, pp. 269–282.
Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003): Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management 40 (2003), pp 191–204
Majchrazak, A., Rice, D.E., Malhotra, A., King, N.: Technology Adaptation: The case of a Computer-Supported Inter-organizational Virtual Team, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24,No. 4, pp. 569–600, 2000.
Massey, A.P., Hung, Y.C., Montoya-Weiss, M., and Ramesh, V. (2001): When Culture and Style Aren’t About Clothes: Perceptions of Task-Technology “Fit” in Global Virtual Teams, Proceedings of the 2001 — International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Wokr — vol. 2001.
Mathiassen, Lars: Collaborative Practice Research, in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems — Vol. 14, 2002; pp. 57–76.
Mathiassen, Lars: Reflective Systems Development, in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems — Vol. 10,No. 1&2, 1998; pp. 67–134.
Maznevski, M.L. and Chudoba, K.M. (2000): Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness, Organization Science, Vol. 11,no. 5, September–October 2000, pp. 473–492.
Neville, K. and Fitzgerald, B. (2002): An Innovative Training Model for an Organization Embracing Technology, Journal of IT Education, Vol.1,No. 3.
Olesen, H.S. and Jensen, J.H. (1999): Project Studies — A late modern university reform?, Roskilde University Press, 1999.
Orlikowski, Wanda J.: Learning from NOTES: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation, in J. Turner and R. Kraut (eds.): CSCW’ 92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, 31. October–4. November 1992, ACM Press, New York, 1992, pp. 362–369.
Paré, G. and Dubé, L. (1999): Virtual Teams: An exploratory study of key challenges and strategies. Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Information Systems, January 1999.
Pavlou, P.A. (2001) Consumer Intentions to Adopt Electronic Commerce-Incorporating Trust and Risk in the Technology Acceptance Model, Paper Presented at DIGIT Workshop, December, http://www.mis.temple.edu/digit, accessed the 4th February, 2003.
Perakyla, A. (1997), Reliability and Validity in Research Based on Transcripts, in Qualitative Research, Ed. Silverman D., Sage Publications, pp. 201–220.
Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2000): Virtual Teams: Managerial Behavior Control’s impact on Team Effectiveness, International Conference on Information Systems. Proceedings of the 21 ICIS, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 575–580.
Prinz, W. (1999): NESSIE: An Awareness Environment for Cooperative Settings, GMD-FIT, Germany, Proceedings of the Sixth European conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1999, Copenhagen, Denmark, Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA, 1999
Schmidt, K. (2002): The Problem with ‘Awareness’ — Introductory Remarks on ‘Awareness in CSCW’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 11, 2002, pp. 285–298.
Schmidt, K. and Simone, C. (1996): Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW system design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5,no. 2–3,1996, pp. 155–200
Simonsen, J. and Kensing, F. (1997): Using Ethnography in Contextual design, Communication of the ACM, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp. 82–88.
Steinfield, C., Jang, C. and Pfaff, B. (1999): Supporting Virtual Team Collaboration: The TeamSCOPE System, Group 99, Phoenix Arizona USA, ACM 1999 — 1-58113-065-1/99/11
Tollmar, K., Sandor, O., and Schomer, A. (1996): Supporting social awareness @Work: Design and experience, in Proceedings of CSCW’ 96, Cambridge MA, November 1996, ACM Press, pp. 298–307
Venkatesh, V. (2000): Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into The Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, Issue 4, p. 342–366.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. (2000): A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, Vol. 46,No. 2, pp. 186–205.
Vidgen, R. and Braa, K. (1997): Balancing Interpretation and Intervention in Information System Research: The Action Case Approach. In Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J.I. (Eds.) (1997): Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall.
Walcott, H.F. (1994), Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Yager, S.E. (1999): Using Information Technology in a Virtual Work World: Characteristics of Collaborative Workers, SIGCPR’ 99, New Orleans, LA, USA. Copyright ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bjørn, P., Scupola, A. (2004). Groupware Integration in Virtual Learning Teams. In: Fitzgerald, B., Wynn, E. (eds) IT Innovation for Adaptability and Competitiveness. TDIT 2004. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 141. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8000-X_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8000-X_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7999-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8000-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive