Skip to main content

Non-Indigenous Plant Species In Central European Forest Ecosystems

  • Chapter
Book cover Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas

Abstract

In the study presented here, the occurrence of non-indigenous vascular plant species in Central European forest ecosystems is outlined with regard to the current state and future perspectives. A focus is laid on Germany. This analysis is based on numerous ecological investigations on the species and ecosystem level. In total, 29 non-indigenous woody and 25 non-indigenous herb species are recorded within forest stands. Generally, there are much less exotic species, which grow on forest sites compared to habitats more or less strongly altered by human impact like, for example, agricultural and urban-industrial ecosystems. Most of the exotic species found in forests belong to the plant families Rosaceae, Pinaceae, and Asteraceae and have their origin in North America. A wide range of different natural and anthropogenic forest communities are invaded by non-indigenous plants, such as floodplain forests, mixed broad-leaved and conifer forests on nutrient-poor to nutrient-rich sites, and dry oak forests. The establishment of nonindigenous species in forests can affect the ecosystem considerably. This is shown, for instance, for the tree species Robinia pseudoacacia(alteration of the soil conditions) and Prunus serotina(influence on forest regeneration) and the herbs of the genus Fallopia(decrease of species richness on a local scale). Few nonindigenous species in forests, like for example Prunus serotina, can cause problems with regard to land use on a supra-regional scale. In conclusion, the management of non-indigenous species in forests on a local scale, in accordance with regional nature conservation objectives and considering socio-economic aspects might be useful. However, an assessment of a positive or negative impact of non-indigenous species on forest ecosystems has to be based on properly defined values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adolphi, K. (1995). Neophytische Kultur- und Anbaupflanzen als Kulturflüchtlinge des Rheinlandes. Nardus,2, 1-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, S. and Zerbe, S. (2001). Historische und floristisch-vegetationskundliche Untersuchungen im Landschaftspark Märkisch-Wilmersdorf als Beitrag zur Gartendenkmalpflege. Landschaftsentwickl. u. Umweltforschg.,117, 1-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auge, H. (1997). Biologische Invasionen: Das Beispiel Mahonia aquifolium. In R. Feldmann, K. Henle, H. Auge, J. Flachowsky, S. Klotz and R. Krönert (Eds.), Regeneration und nachhaltige Landnutzung: Konzepte für belastete Regionen(pp. 124-129). Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkert, D., Erzberger, P., Klawitter, J., Linder, W., Linke, C., Schaepe, A., Steinland, M. and Wiehle, W. (1995). Liste der Moose von Brandenburg und Berlin mit Gefährdungsgraden. Verh. Bot. Ver. Berlin Brandenbg., 128, 1-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böcker, R., Gebhardt, H., Konold, W. and Schmidt-Fischer, S. (1995). Gebietsfremde Pflanzen. Auswirkungen auf einheimische Arten, Lebensgemeinschaften und Biotope, Kontrollmöglichkeiten und Management. ecomed, Landsberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhmer, H.-J., Heger, T. and Trepl, L. (2001). Fallstudien zu gebietsfremden Arten in Deutschland. UBATexte, 13, 1-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Ed.) (2005). Daten und Informationen zu Wildpflanzen und zur Vegetation Deutschlands. Retrieved Dec. 2005 from http://www.floraweb.de.

  • Cassidy, T.M., Fownes, J.H. and Harrington, R.A. (2004). Nitrogen limits an invasive perennial shrub in forest understory. Biol. Invasions, 6, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmura, D., Woźniak, G., śliwińska-Wyrzychowska, A. (2005). The participation of invasive plants in the degeneration of coniferous forests of the Silesian Upland. In A. Brzeg and M. Wojterska (Eds.), Coniferous forests vegetation – differentiation, dynamics and transformations. Wyd. Nauk. UAM, Ser. Biologia, 69, 339-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutschewitz, K., Lausch, A., Kühn, I. and Klotz, S. (2003). Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany. Global Ecol. and Biogeography, 12, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dostálek, J. (1997). Changes in the distribution of synanthropic plants along roads in the territory of the Protected Landscape Area of the Orlické hory Mts. Přŕroda10, 159-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, C. and Diekmann, M. (1998). Prediction of occurrence of vascular plants in deciduous forests of South Sweden by means of Ellenberg indicator values. Appl. Veg. Sci., 1, 139-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H. (1996). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. 5th ed., Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. and Paulissen, D. (1991). Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot. 18, 1–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falinski, J.B. (1986). Vegetation dynamics in temperate lowland primeval forests. Geobotany, 8, 1-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E., Schuldes, H., Kübler R. and Konold, W. (1995). Neophyten. Biologie, Verbreitung und Kontrolle ausgewählter Arten.ecomed, Landsberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J.S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V.A., Epstein, P.R., Ewel, J.J., Klink, C.A., Lugo, A.E., Norton, D., Ojima, D., Richardson, D., Sanderson, E.W., Valladares, F., Vilá, M., Zamora, R. and Zobel, M. (2005). Emerging Ecosystems: Theoretical and Management Aspects of the New Ecological World Order. Retrieved Jan. 2005 from http://www.unesco.org/mab/EE/ hobbs.pdf.

  • Hobbs, R.J. and Huenneke, L.F. (1992). Disturbance, diversity, and invasions: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biol., 6, 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, G. (1961). Die Stickstoffbindung der Robinie (Robinia pseudoacaciaL.). Arch. Forstwesen, 10, 627-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huennecke, L.F., Hamburg, S.P., Koide, R., Mooney, H.A. and Vitousek, P.A. (1990). Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecol., 71, 478–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttl, R. (1998). Neuartige Waldschäden. Ber. u. Abh. Berlin-Brandenburg. Akad. d. Wissensch.,5, 131- 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordán, F., Takács-Sánta, A. and Molnár, I. (1999). A reliability theoretical quest for keystones. Oikos, 86, 453-462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurko, A. (1963). Die Veränderung der ursprünglichen Waldphytozönosen durch die Introduktion der Robinie. Ceskoslov. Ochr. Prŕr., 1, 56-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurko, A. and Kontris, J. (1982). Phytocoenological and ecological characteristics of acacia-woods in the little Carpathians. Biológia, 37, 67-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, A. (2005). Use and perception of post-industrial urban landscapes in the Ruhr. In I. Kowarik and S. Körner (Eds.), Wild Urban Woodlands. New Perspectives for Urban Forestry(pp. 117-130). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klauck, E.J. (1986). Robinien-Gesellschaften im mittleren Saartal. Tuexenia, 6, 325-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimo, E., Hager, H. and Kulhavý, J. (Eds.) (2000). Spruce monocultures in Central Europe –problems and prospects. Eur. For. Inst. Proc., 33, 1-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoerzer, D. (1999). Zur Naturverjüngung der Douglasie im Schwarzwald. Diss. Bot., 306, 1–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoerzer, D. and Reif, A. (2002). Fremdländische Baumarten in deutschen Wäldern. Fluch oder Segen? In I. Kowarik and U. Starfinger (Eds.), Biologische Invasionen: Herausforderung zum Handeln? Neobiota, 1, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, A. and Sukopp, H. (1964). über die soziologische Struktur einiger Robinienbestände im Stadtgebiet von Berlin. Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde N.F., 4, 74-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. (1990). Zur Einführung und Ausbreitung der Robinie (Robinia pseudoacaciaL.) in Brandenburg und zur Sukzession ruderaler Robinienbestände in Berlin. Verh. Berliner Bot. Ver., 8, 33-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. (1992). Einführung und Ausbreitung nichteinheimischer Gehölzarten in Berlin und Brandenburg und ihre Folgen für Flora und Vegetation. Ein Modell für die Freisetzung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen. Verh. Bot. Ver. Berlin Brandenbg., Suppl., 3, 1–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. (1995). On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek and M. Wade (Eds.), Plant invasions. General aspects and special problems(pp. 85-103). SPB Acad. Publ., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. (2003). Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. and Körner, S. (Eds.) (2005). Wild urban woodlands. New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik, I. and Schepker, H. (1998). Plant invasions in Northern Germany: Human perception and response. In U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik and M. Williamson (Eds.), Plant invasions: Ecological mechanism and human responses(pp. 109-120). Backhuys Publ., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyer, D. and Zerbe, S. (2006). Short-lived tree species and their role as indicators for plant diversity in pine forests. Restor. Ecol., 14, 137-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmeyer, W. and Sukopp, H. (1992). Agriophyten in der Vegetation Mitteleuropas. Schriftenr. Vegetationskde., 25, 1-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmeyer, W. and Sukopp, H. (2001). Agriophyten in der Vegetation Mitteleuropas. 1. Nachtrag. In >D. Brandes (Ed.), Adventivpflanzen. Beiträge zu Biologie, Vorkommen und Ausbreitungsdynamik von Archaeophyten und Neophyten in Mitteleuropa. Braunschw. Geobot. Arb., 8, 179-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, S. and Lavorel, S. (1994). Predicting richness of native, rare, and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Conserv. Biol.,8, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L.S., Soulé, M.E. and Doak, D.F. (1993). The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience,43, 219-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer, E. (1992). Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, Part IV: Wälder und Gebüsche. 2nd ed., Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer, E. (2001). Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. 8th ed., Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsthoorn, A.F.M., Bartelink, H.H., Gardiner, J.J., Pretzsch, H., Hekhuis, H.J. and Franc, A. (1999). Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN Scient Contrib., 15, 1-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paar, M., Tiefenbach, M. and Winkler, I. (1994). Trockenrasen in österreich. Bestandsaufnahme und Gefährdung. UBA-Rep., 107, 1-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. (1993). Factors affecting the diversity of flora and vegetation in Central European settlements. Vegetatio, 106, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. (1997). Compositae as invaders – better than others? Preslia, 69, 9-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. (1998b). Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos, 82, 282-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. and Prach, K. (1994). Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats – a comparison of four species alien to Central Europe. J. Biogeogr., 20, 413-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P., Prach, K.Rejmánek, M. and Wade, M. (Eds.) (1995). Plant Invasions. General Aspects and Special Problems. SPB Acad. Publ., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. and Pyšek, A. (1995). Invasion of Heracleum mantegazzianumin different habitats in the Czech Republic. J. Veg. Sci.,6, 711-718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J. and Mandák, B. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia, 74, 97-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebele, F. and Dettmar, J. (1996). Industriebrachen. ökologie und Management. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P. (2005). Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In E. van der Maarel (Ed.). Vegetation Ecology(pp. 332-354). Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandlund, O.T., Schei, P.J. and Viken, A. (1999). Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepker, H. (1998). Wahrnehmung, Ausbreitung und Bewertung von Neophyten. Eine Analyse der problematischen nichteinheimischen Pflanzenarten in Niedersachsen. ibidem, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepker, H. and Kowarik, I. (1998). Invasive North American blueberry hybrids (Vaccinium corymbosumx angustifolium) in Northern Germany. In U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik and M. Williamson (Eds.), Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses(pp. 253- 260). Backhuys Publ., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, F.-G. (1969). Zur Klassifizierung der Anthropochoren. Vegetatio, 16, 225-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, F.-G. (1972). Amelanchier-Arten als Neophyten in Europa. Abh. Naturwiss. Ver. Bremen, 37, 287-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaeth, I., Balder, H. and Kilz, E. (1994). Das Problem mit der Spätblühenden Traubenkirsche in den Berliner Forsten. Allg. Forstzeitschr., 49, 234-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfinger, U. (1997). Introduction and naturalization of Prunus serotinain Central Europe. In J.H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pyšek and D. Green (Eds.), Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe(pp. 161–171). Backhuys Publ., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfinger, U., Edwards, K., Kowarik, I. and Williamson, M. (Eds.) (1998). Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanism and Human Responses. Backhuys Publ., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfinger, U., Kowarik, I., Rode, M. and Schepker, H. (2003). From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? – the perception of an alien tree species through the centuries. Biol. Invasions,5, 323-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T.J., Binkley, D., Chong, G.W., Kalkhan, M.A., Schell, L.D., Bull, K.A., Otsuki, J., Newman, G., Bashkin, M. and Son, Y. (1999). Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr., 69, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepl, L. (1983). Zum Gebrauch von Pflanzenarten als Indikatoren der Umweltdynamik. Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde N.F., 23, 151-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepl, L. (1984). über Impatiens parvifloraDC. Agriophyt in Mitteleuropa. Diss. Bot., 73, 1–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress O.T.A. (1993). Harmful Non-Iindigenous Species in the United States.U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M., D’Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., Rejmanek, M. and Westbrooks, R. (1997). Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand J. Ecol.,21: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmanns, O. and Bogenrieder, A. (1995). Die Entwicklung von Flaumeichenwäldern im Kaiserstuhl im Laufe des letzten halben Jahrhunderts. Forstarchiv, 4, 167-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S. (1999). Die Wald- und Forstgesellschaften des Spessarts mit Vorschlägen zu deren zukünftigen Entwicklung. Mitt. Naturwiss. Mus. Aschaffenbg., 19, 1–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S. (2001). On the ecology of Sorbus aucuparia(Rosaceae) with special regard to germination, establishment, and growth. Pol. Bot. J., 46, 229-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe S. (2002). Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage., 167, 27-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S., Brande, A. and Gladitz, F. (2000). Kiefer, Eiche und Buche in der Menzer Heide (NBrandenburg). Veränderungen der Waldvegetation unter dem Einflu{\ss} des Menschen. Verh. Bot. Ver. Berlin Brandenbg., 133, 45-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S., Maurer, U., Schmitz, S., Sukopp, H. (2003). Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan., 62, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S. and Vater, G. (2000). Vegetationskundliche und standortsökologische Untersuchungen in Pappelforsten auf Niedermoorstandorten des Oberspreewaldes (Brandenburg). Tuexenia, 20, 55-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S. and Wirth, P. (2006). Ecological range of invasive plant species in Central European pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) forests. Ann. For. Sci., 63, 189-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

ZERBE, S. (2008). Non-Indigenous Plant Species In Central European Forest Ecosystems. In: Hong, SK., Nakagoshi, N., Fu, B., Morimoto, Y. (eds) Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5488-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics