Skip to main content

Computer Simulation: Practice, Epistemology, and Social Dynamics

  • Chapter
Simulation

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook ((SOSC,volume 25))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1975). “La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison”, Sociologie et Sociétés, 7: 91–118 (rééd.: (1976), “Le champ scientifique”, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,2/3: 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité,Paris: Editions Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, L.O. and T. Roska (2002) Cellular Neural Networks and Visual Computing: Foundation and Applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1996).ct ”Computer simulations and the trading zone”, in P. Gallison and D.J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power,Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 118–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics,Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1970). “Mathematical games: The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game ‘Life”’, Scientific American,223: 120–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (ed.) (1994). “Numerical experimentation”, in P. Humphreys (ed.), Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher, Vol. 2, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, B. and T. Shinn (eds.) (2001). Instrumentation between Science, State and Industry, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol. 22, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (2003). “Model simulation and ‘computer experiments’“, in H. Radder (ed.), The Philosophy of Experimentation,Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press 2003, pp. 198-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küppers, G. and J. Lenhard (2006). “Computersimulationen: Modellierungen zweiter Ordnung”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. (1990). “Science and daily life”, in W. Krohn, G. Küppers and H. Nowotny (eds.), Selforganization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (1954). Die Bekenntnisse des Hochstaplers Felix Krull, Frankfurt a.M.: S. Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. (2003). “Experiments without material intervention. Model experiments, virtual experiments, and virtually experiments”, in H. Radder (ed.), The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. and M. Morrison (eds.), (1999). “Models as mediating instruments”, in M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Oxford English Dictionary, fourth edition, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F. (1991). “Computer simulation in the physical sciences”, in F. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, vol. 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Science Citation Index (SCI® ), Thomson ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980). “Minds, brains, and programs”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S. (ed.), (2004). The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior as the Hallmark of Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, T. and B. Joerges (2002). “The transverse science and technology culture: Dynamics and roles of research-technology”, Social Science Information, 41: 207–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A.M. (1950). “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, LIX: 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, E. (1999). “Sactioning models: The epistemology of simulation”, Science in Context, 12: 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, E. (2003). “Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world”, Philosophy of Science, 70: 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, B.P. (1976). Theory of Modelling and Simulation,Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

KÜppers, G. (2006). Computer Simulation: Practice, Epistemology, and Social Dynamics. In: Lenhard, J., Küppers, G., Shinn, T. (eds) Simulation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5375-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics