The paper discusses the incorporation of richer semantic structures into the Preference Semantics system: they are called pseudo-texts and capture something of the information expressed in one type of frame proposed by Minsky (q.v.). However, they are in a format, and subject to rules of inference, consistent with earlier accounts of this system of language analysis and understanding. Their use is discussed in connection with the phenomenon of extended use: sentences where the semantic preferences are broken. It is argued that such situations are the norm and not the exception in normal language use, and that a language understanding system must give some general treatment of them. A notion of sense projection is proposed, leading on to an alteration of semantic formulas (word sense representations) in the face of unexpected context by drawing information from the pseudo texts. A possible implementation is described, based on a new semantic parser for the Preference Semantics system, which would cope with extended use by the methods suggested and answer questions about the process of analysis itself. It is argued that this would be a good context in which to place a language understander (rather than that of question-answering about a limited area of the real world, as is normal) and, moreover, that the sense projection mechanisms suggested would provide a test-bed on which the usefulness of frames for language understanding could be realistically assessed
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bobrow, D. and Winograd, T., K.R.L.—an overview of a knowledge representation language, Cognitive Science 1 (1977) 3–46.
Boden, M., Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. (Harvester Press, Hassocks, 1977).
Charniak, E., A framed PAINTING: the representation of a commonsense knowledge fragment, Cognitive Science 1 (1977) 355–394.
Chomsky, N., Aspects of a Theory of Syntax (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965).
Chomsky, N., Language and Mind (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969).
Fillmore, C., Scenes and frames semantics, in: Zampolli, ed., Linguistics Structures Processes (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977) 55–82.
Granger, R. H., FOUL-UP, a program that figures out meanings of words from context, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University (1977).
Grice, H. P., Logic and Conversation, in: Cole and Morgan, eds., Syntax and Semantics, 3 (Academic Press, New York, 1975) 43–59.
Katz, J. and Fodor, J., The structure of a semantic theory, Language 39 (1963) 170–210.
Minsky, M., A frame-work for representing knowledge, in: Winston, ed., The psychology of computer vision (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975) 211–277.
Pownall, D., The Raining Tree War (Heinemann, London, 1974).
Reddy, R. et al., The Hearsay speech understanding system, Proc. Third Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intell. (Stanford, CA, S.R.I., 1973) 185–193.
Russell, S., Computer understanding of metaphorical verbs, Amer. Jl. Comput. Ling. 44 (1976).
Schank, R., ed., Conceptual Information Processing (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
Schank, R., Using knowledge to understand (1975) as [24].
Schank, R. and Colby, K., eds., Computer Models of Thought and Language (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).
Schank, R. and Abelson, R., Scripts, Plans and Goals (Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1977).
Wilks, Y., Computable Semantic Derivations. Memo # SP-3017 (Systems Devel. Corp., Santa Monica, 1968).
Wilks, Y., Grammar, Meaning and the Machine Analysis of Language (Routledge, London and Boston, 1972).
Wilks, Y., Natural Language Inference, Memo # AIM–211 (Artificial Intelligence Lab., Stanford, 1973).
Wilks, Y., Preference Semantics, in: Keenan, ed., The Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1975) 329–350.
Wilks, Y., An intelligent analyzer and understander of English, Comm. A.C.M., 18 (1975) 264–274.
Wilks, Y., A preferential, pattern-matching semantics for natural language understanding, Artificial Intelligence, 6 (1975) 53–74.
Wilks, Y., Primitives and words, in: Theoret. Issues in Natural Language Processing (B.B.N. Cambridge, MA, 1975) 27–31.
Wilks, Y., De minimis: the archaeology of frames, in: Proc. AISB Conf. (Artif. Intell. Dept., Edinburgh, 1976) 111–126.
Wilks, Y., What sort of taxonomy of causality do we need for natural language understanding? Cognitive Science 2 (1977) 235–264.
Wilks, Y. Good and bad arguments for semantic primitives (Dept. of Artificial Intelligence Univ. of Edinburgh, 1977) Memo No. 42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilks, Y. (2007). Making Preferences More Active. In: Ahmad, K., Brewster, C., Stevenson, M. (eds) Words and Intelligence I. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5285-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5285-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5284-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5285-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)