Skip to main content

Towards a Standard Terminology for (Bio)Semiotics

  • Chapter
Book cover Introduction to Biosemiotics
  • 1275 Accesses

Abstract

Semiotic theory has often been burdened by terminological inconsistencies and especially by the use of concepts and definitions in idiosyncratic ways. This paper aims to provide a framework for eliminating such inconsistencies and idiosyncracies by putting forward a simple system of terms based on Modeling Systems Theory, as developed by the late Thomas A. Sebeok, that takes into account semiotic behavior across species. The four basic forms proposed here (singularized, composite, cohesive, and connective) are defined, illustrated, and defended as solutions for standardizing semiotic terminology and for bringing general semiotic theory more in line with the biosemiotic movement

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barbieri, M. (1985). The Semantic Theory of Evolution. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2003). The Organic Codes. An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Elements of Semiology. New York: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1956 [1947]). Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2003). Poetic Logic: The Role of Metaphor in Thought, Language, and Culture. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2001). Four Ages of Understanding: The First Postmodern Survey of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2003). Why Semiotics? Ottawa: Legas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1978). Semiotics: A Discipline or an Interdisciplinary Method. In: A. Sebeok (ed.), Sight, Sound, and Sense, 73–88. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennion, E. R. and Tinbergen, N. (1967). Tracks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florkin, M. (1974). Concepts of Molecular Biosemiotics and Molecular Evolution. In M. Florkin and E H. Stotz (eds.), Comprehensive Biochemistry, Molecular Evolution, 1–124. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879). Begiffsschrift eine der Aritmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Nebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, H. (1955). The Honey-Guides. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 208. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goatley, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J. (1987). On Meaning: Selected Writings on Semiotic Theory. P. Perron and F. H. Collins (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. (1955). Animal Communication and the Origin of Human Language. Science Progress 43, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (1966). A Discussion of Ritualization of Behaviour in Animals and Men. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 251, 247–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F. (1974). The Logic of Living Systems: A History of Heredity. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1970). Language in Relation to Other Communication Systems. In C. Olivetti (ed.), Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, 3–16. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloft, W. (1959). Versuch einer Analyse der Trophobiotischen Beziehungen von Ameisen zu Aphiden, Biologische Zentralblatt 78, 863–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, L. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George and Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Y. (1991). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, W. and McCulloch, W. S. (1947). How We Know Universals: The Perception of Auditory and Visual Forms. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 9, 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. Robering, K., and Sebeok, T. A. (eds.) (1997–2004). Semiotik/Semiotics. Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur/A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, 4 vols. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. (1972). The Social Behaviour of Monkeys. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1963). Communication among Social Bees; Porpoises and Sonar; Man and Dolphin. Language 39, 448–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1972). Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1994). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Global Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. and Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1975). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models. Reading: W.A. Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. von (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tierre. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danesi, M. (2008). Towards a Standard Terminology for (Bio)Semiotics. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics