Skip to main content

Durability of resistance and cost of virulence

  • Chapter
  • 584 Accesses

Abstract

A seasonal model, where a growing season is defined as the time between sowing and harvest and alternates with an inter-crop period, was derived to study the effects of the ‘cost of virulence’ and cropping ratio on durability of resistance. We assumed a single strain of virulent pathogen, a single strain of avirulent pathogen and two cultivars (one resistant and one susceptible) and studied two measures of durability of resistance (‘take-over time’ and ‘usefulness time’). Take-over time is defined as the time needed for the virulent strain of the pathogen to reach a preset threshold and predominate over the previous pathogen population. Usefulness time is the time needed before the estimated gain in green canopy area duration per plant through the use of the resistant cultivar becomes negligible. The model suggested that, although it could take several seasons before the virulent strain of the pathogen predominated over the previous pathogen population, the usefulness time of the resistant cultivar was always much shorter. Furthermore, increasing selection for the virulent strain of the pathogen (through increasing the cropping ratio of the resistant cultivar) caused the virulent strain of the pathogen to invade the system more rapidly. Cost of virulence, reflecting differences in pathogen infection rates between the four possible combinations of cultivar/pathogen strain, significantly affected durability of resistance, with the dynamics of the virulent and avirulent strains ranging from a case where the virulent strain of the pathogen died out to a case where the virulent strain of the pathogen invaded the resident pathogen population. An intermediate state, where the system reached equilibrium and the virulent strain of the pathogen neither became predominant nor died out, was defined as ‘coexistence’ of both strains of the pathogen. Occurrence of coexistence was directly related to the cost of virulence since it did not occur when virulence of the pathogen did not have a fitness cost. Two methods to include cost of virulence in the model gave similar results in relation to the two measures of durability of resistance studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aubertot JN, West JS, Bousset-Vaslin L, Salam MU, Barbetti MJ and Diggle AJ (2006) Modelling for integrated avirulence management: Case study of phoma stem canker of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). European Journal of Plant Pathology 114: 91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun H, Levivier S, Somda I, Ruer D, Renard M and Chèvre AM (2000) A field method for evaluating the potential durability of new resistance sources: Application to the Leptosphaeria maculans-Brassica napus pathosystem. Phytopathology 90: 961–966

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brun H, Huteau V, Ermel M, Eber F, Chèvre AM and Renard M (2004) Field behaviour of oilseed rape genotypes carrying major resistance genes exposed to different Leptosphaeria maculans populations. International Organisation for Biological Control Bulletin 27: 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Delourme R, Chèvre AM, Brun H, Rouxel T, Balesdent MH, Dias JS, Salisbury P, Renard M and Rimmer SR (2006) Major gene and polygenic resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). European Journal of Plant Pathology 114: 41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt RE (1995) The relationship between plant-disease severity and yield. Annual Review of Phytopathology 33: 119–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett BJ (2004) Current knowledge of the interaction between Brassica napus and Leptosphaeria maculans. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 26: 245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YJ, Li ZQ, Evans N, Rouxel T, Fitt BDL and Balesdent MH (2006) Fitness cost associated with loss of the AvrLm4 avirulence function in Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker of oilseed rape). European Journal of Plant Pathology 114: 77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley TM, Babcock BA and Hellmich RL (2001) Bt corn and insect resistance: An economic assessment of refuges. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26: 176–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn ML, Gout L, Howlett BJ, Melayah D, Meyer M, Balesdent MH and Rouxel T (2006) The genome of Leptosphaeria maculans. European Journal of Plant Pathology 114: 17–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sivasithamparam K and Barbetti MJ (2003) Breakdown of a Brassica rapa subsp. Sylvestris single dominant blackleg resistance gene in B. napus rapeseed by Leptosphaeria maculans field isolates in Australia. Plant Disease 87: 752

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Damour L, Sivasithamparam K and Barbetti MJ (2004a) Increased virulence and physiological specialization among western Australian isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans breaking down existing single dominant gene-based resistance in six cultivars of Brassica napus. Brassica 6: 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Barbetti MJ and Kuo J (2004b) Germination and invasion by ascospores and pycnidiospores of Leptosphaeria maculans on spring-type Brassica napus canola varieties with varying susceptibility to blackleg. Journal of General Plant Pathology 70: 261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcroft SJ, Purwantara A, Salisbury PA, Potter TD, Wratten N, Khangura R, Barbetti MJ and Howlett BJ (2002) Reaction of a range of Brassica species under Australian conditions to the fungus, Leptosphaeria maculans, the causal agent of blackleg. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42: 587–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcroft SJ, Sprague SJ, Pymer SJ, Salisbury PA and Howlett BJ (2003) Factors affecting production of inoculum of the blackleg fungus (Leptosphaeria maculans) in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 1231–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald BA and Linde C (2002) Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 349–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietravalle S, van den Bosch F and Evans N (2004) Durability of resistance, a modelling approach. International Organisation for Biological Control Bulletin 27: 119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Regev U (2002). Pest resistance in agriculture: An economic perspective. The Economics of Managing Biotechnologies (pp. 51–69). Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Regev U, Shalit H and Gutierrez AP (1983) On the optimal allocation of pesticides with increasing resistance-the case of Alfalfa Weevil. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10: 86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouxel T, Penaud A, Pinochet X, Brun H, Gout L, Delourme R, Schmit J and Balesdent MH (2003) A 10-year survey of populations of Leptosphaeria maculans in France indicates a rapid adaptation towards the Rlm1 resistance gene of oilseed rape. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109: 871–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turkington TK, Clayton GW, Klein-Gebbinck H and Woods DL (2000) Residue decomposition and blackleg of canola: influence of tillage practices. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 22: 150–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bosch F and Gilligan CA (2003) Measures of durability of resistance. Phytopathology 93: 616–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wherrett AD, Sivasithamparam K and Barbetti MJ (2004) Establishing the relationship of ascospore loads with blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) severity on canola (Brassica napus). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55: 849–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

B. D. L. Fitt N. Evans B. J. Howlett B. M. Cooke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pietravalle, S., Lemarié, S., van den Bosch, F. (2006). Durability of resistance and cost of virulence. In: Fitt, B.D.L., Evans, N., Howlett, B.J., Cooke, B.M. (eds) Sustainable strategies for managing Brassica napus (oilseed rape) resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4525-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics