Abstract
Many strong arguments can be made to support the collection of good indicators of children’s well-being and for using such indicators to informpolicy and practice. Indeed, indicators such as rates of teen pregnancy, high school graduation, or dropping out can support, contradict, or generally inform public and political opinion about the circumstances of young people today and that is why great effort and resources are expended in collecting and refining child indicator data.1 Indicators, however, are just one of several important tools for policymakers to rely upon when faced with making difficult policy decisions. Indicator data alone cannot provide information or specific guidance about a policy response to a social problem. Experimental studies are a key type of social science research—the “gold standard” method for untangling cause from effect—that can fulfill this role for policymakers and serve as a necessary complement to indicator data to best inform policy decisions. Here we make the case for the role of experimental studies as the link between indicator data (identifying a social policy concern) and policy decisions.We describe how the results from experimental studies can inform policy decisions as well as the choice of which indicators to study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brock, T., et al. (2002). Welfare Reform in Cleveland. New York: MDRC.
Brock, T., et al. (2004). Welfare Reform in Miami. New York: MDRC.
Capizzano, J. and Stagner, M. (2005). Studying the role of child well-being indicators in the policy process: using surveys among decision makers. In Ben-Arieh, A. and Goerge, B. (eds.), Indicators of Children's Well-Being: Understanding Their Role, Usage, and Policy Influence. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag, pp. 151–160
Cochrane Collaboration (2002). Cochrane controlled trials register. The Cochrane Library, 3rd edition. New York.
Figlio, D.N. (1995). The effects of drinking age laws and alcohol-related crashes: time series evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(4):555–566
Gennetian, L.A., Duncan, G., Knox, V., Clark-Kauffman, B., and Vargas, W. (2002a). How Welfare and Work Policies for Parents Affect Adolescents: A Synthesis of Research. New York: MDRC.
Gennetian, L.A., et al. (2002b). Making Child Care Choices. New York: MDRC.
Gennetian, L.A., Morris, P., Bos, J., and Bloom, H. (in press). Using instrumental variables analysis to learn more from social policy experiments. In Bloom, H. (ed.), Moving to the Next Level: Combining Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods to Advance Employment Policy Research.New York: Russell Sage.
Gomby, D.S., Culross, P.L., and Behrman, R.E. (1999). Home visiting: recent program evaluations, analysis, and recommendations. Future of Children, 9(1):4–26
Greenberg, D. and Shroder, M. (1997). The Digest of Social Experiments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Little, T. (2005). Increasing the impact of indicators among legislative policymakers. In Ben-Arieh, A. and Goerge, B. (eds.), Indicators of Children's Well-Being: Understanding Their Role, Usage, and Policy Influence. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag, pp. 131–140
McCall, R.B. and Green, B.L. (2004). Beyond the methodological gold standard of behavioral research: considerations for practice and policy. Social Policy Report, 18(2), pp. 1–20
Michalopoulos, C. (in press). Precedents and prospects for randomized experiments. In Bloom, H. (ed.), Moving to the Next Level: Combining Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods to Advance Employment Policy Research.New York: Russell Sage.
Moffitt, R. (2003). The role of randomized field trials in social science research: a perspective from evaluations of reforms of social welfare programs. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. T0295.
Moore, K.A., Brown, B.V., and Scarupa, H.J. (2003). The uses (and misuses) of social indicators: implications for public policy. Research Brief. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Morris, P., Duncan, G., and Clark-Kauffman E. (2004). Child well-being in an era of welfare-reform: the sensitivity of transitions in development to policy change. Unpublished manuscript. New York: MDRC.
Morris, P., and Gennetian, L. (2003). Identifying the effects of income on children's development using experimental data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65:716–729
Munnell, A.H. (1986). Lessons from the Income Maintenance Experiments: Proceedings of a Conference Held in September 1986. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Office of Income Security Policy, Department of Health and Human Services (1983). Overview of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Song, Y. and Lu, H. (2002) . Child Poverty Fact Sheet. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000). Trends in the Well-Being of America's Children and Youth.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MORRIS, P., GENNETIAN, L. (2006). Indicators and Policy Decisions: The Important Role of Experimental Studies. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Goerge, R.M. (eds) Indicators of Children's Well Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4242-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4242-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4237-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4242-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)