Abstract
The process of selecting the best proposals for observing time on observatories in space and on the ground is vitally important for astronomy and is generally done well, but the system has problems and can be improved. I identify four types of bias that enter the process when the oversubscription of observing time is large. The negative interaction between the large oversubscription rates and these biases should be recognized and can be mitigated. I believe that selection committees provide the most competent and least biased advice when they are given a modest number of proposals (roughly 50) covering a coherent but modest range of scientific topics, and the approximate time allocations among the committees covering the different scientific topics are driven largely by proposal pressure. There are several mechanisms for revising when necessary the allocations of observing time among the various committees.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Linsky, J.L. (2006). An Insider’s Perspective on Observing Time Selection Committees. In: Heck, A. (eds) Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy Volume 6. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 335. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4056-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4056-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4055-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4056-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)