This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alastair I. Johnston, “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly, 45 (2001), pp. 487–515.
Thomas Risse, “Let’s Argue: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization, 54 (2000), p. 28. See also Frank Schimmelfennig, “International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an International Environment,” European Journal of International Relations, 16 (2000), p. 111.
Frank Schimmelfennig, “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization, 55 (2001), pp. 47–80. See also Frank Schimmelfennig, “The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and Eastern European States,” in Linden Ron (ed.), Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and Eastern European States (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002).
Jeffrey T. Checkel, “Bridging the Rational-Choice/Constructivist Gap? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions,” ARENA Working Papers WP 00/11(2000). See also Jeffrey T. Checkel, “International Institutions and Socialization in the New Europe,” ARENA Working Papers WP 01/11(2001).
Emanuel Adler, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, 3 (1997), pp. 319–363.
Peter Katzenstein, “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security,” in Peter Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 1–32.
Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), p. 25. See also Jeffrey T. Checkel, “Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” ARENA Working Papers, WP 98/16 (1998), pp. 2–3.
Markus Jachtenfuchs, “Deepening and Widening Integration Theory,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (2002), p. 654.
James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” ARENA Working Papers, WP 5 (1998), p. 13. For a postmodern constructivist approach see Richard Ashley, “The geopolitics of geopolitical space: Toward a critical social theory of international politics,” Alternatives, 12 (1987), pp. 403–434. For a neoliberal-rational approach see Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1984).
Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999).
Heather Grabbe, “European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire,” International Political Science Review, 23 (2002), pp. 251–256. See also András Inotai, “The CEECs: From Association Agreements to Full Membership?,” in John Redmond and Glenda G. Rosenthal (eds.), The Expanding European Union: Past, Present, Future (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers 1998), pp. 159–160.
James D. Fearon, “What is Identity, as we now use the word?,” Stanford University, Draft manuscript (1997).
David Beetham, The Legitimation of Power (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International 1991), pp. 16–17.
March and Olsen, op. cit. n. 9, pp. 8–12.
David Black, “The Long and Winding Road: International Norms and Domestic Political Change in South Africa,” in Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999), p. 103. Regarding persuasion see: Johnston, op. cit. n. 1, p. 490.
Their effectiveness was reduced by the EU’s inability to provide comprehensive and unconditional market access. The Community offered faster import liberalisation on the EU rather than on the CEE side and the degree of market opening on offer in agriculture, iron, textiles and steel was unsatisfactory. For further details on Europe Agreements see Alan Mayhew, Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Graham Avery and Fraser Cameron, The Enlargement of the European Union (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998), p. 33.
Helen Wallace and Ulrich Sedelmeier, “Eastern Enlargement,” in Helen Wallace and William Wallace (eds.), Policy Making in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000), pp. 449–450.
Heather Grabbe, “How does the EU Measure When the CEECs are Ready to Join?,” in Charles Jenkins (ed.), The Unification of Europe: An Analysis of EU Enlargement (London: Centre For Reform 2000), p. 40.
Grabbe, op. cit. n. 12, pp. 257–258.
Commission of the European Communities, Making a Success of Enlargement: Strategy Paper and Regular Reports from the Commission on Progress Towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries (Brussels, 2001), p. 24.
Commission of the European Communities, Enlargement Strategy Paper: Regular Reports from the Commission on Progress towards Accession by each of the Candidate Countries (Brussels, November 2000), p. 7.
John G. Ikenberry and Charles Kupchan, “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization, 44 (1990), pp. 290–292.
European Parliament, The European Conference and the Enlargement of the European Union, Briefing No. 18 (2003), http://www.europarl.eu.int/enlargement/briefings/18alen.htm.
Schimmelfennig, op. cit. n. 2, pp. 126–127.
Ibid, at 118–119.
Heather Grabbe and Kirsty Hughes, Enlarging the EU Eastwards (London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1998), p. 44.
Karen Henderson, “Reforming the Post-Communist States: Meeting the Political Conditions for Membership,” in Charles Jenkins (ed.), The Unification of Europe: An Analysis of EU Enlargement (London: Centre For Reform, 2000), p. 32.
Commission of the European Communities, Comprehensive Monitoring Report on the Czech Republic’s Preparations for Membership (Brussels, 5 November, 2003), pp. 10–14.
Commission of the European Communities, Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Poland’s Preparations for Membership (Brussels, 5 November 2003), pp. 13–14.
David M. Olson, “Democratization and Political Participation: The Experience of the Czech Republic,” in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrot (eds.), The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 154.
For further details on regime change and democratisation in Poland see: Marjorie Castle, and Ray Taras, Democracy in Poland (Oxford: Westview Press 2002), pp. 63–94. See also: Bernhard Wessels and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, “Transformation and the Prerequisites of Democratic Opposition in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Samuel H. Barnes and János Simon (eds.), The Post-Communist Citizen (Budapest: Erasmus Foundation and Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1998), pp. 1–34.
Andrew A. Michta, “Democratic Consolidation in Poland after 1989,” in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrot (eds.), The Consolidation of Democracy inEast-Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998), pp. 74–75. See also John Fitzmaurice, Government and Politics in the Visegrad Countries: Poland, Hungary the Czech Republic and Slovakia (London: MacMillan Press, 1998), pp. 23–27.
Schimmelfennig, op. cit. n. 2, p. 112.
For a detailed analysis of the notions of “diffuse” and “specific” support, see David Easton, “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support,” British Journal of Political Science, 5 (1975), pp. 435–457, as well as David Easton, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: Wiley, 1965).
Timothy G. Ash, History of the Present: Essays, Sketches and Dispatches from Europe in the 1990s (Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, 1999), p. 43.
Γιώργος Δελάστικ, “H Διεύρυνση της E.E. Eϕερε Mεγάλη Kρίση” [EU Enlargement Brought about an Unprecedented Crisis], H Kαθημερινή 21/12/2003, p. 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tamvaki, D. (2006). The Copenhagen Criteria and the Evolution of Popular Consent to EU Norms: From Legality to Normative Justifiability in Poland and the Czech Republic. In: Sadurski, W., Czarnota, A., Krygier, M. (eds) Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3842-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3842-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3841-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3842-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)