Abstract
Plant domestication ranks as one of the most important developments in human history, giving human populations the potential to harness unprecedented quantities of the earth’s resources. But domestication has also played a more subtle historical role as the foundation of the modern study of evolution and adaptation. Until recently, however, researchers interested in domestication were limited to studying phenotypic changes or the genetics of simple Mendelian traits, when often the characters of most interest — fruit size, yield, height, flowering time, etc. — are quantitative in nature. The goals of this paper are to review some of the recent work on the quantitative genetics of plant domestication, identify some of the common trends found in this literature, and offer some novel interpretations of the data that is currently available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aert, R., L. Sági & G. Volckaert, in press. Gene content and density in banana (Musa acuminata) as revealed by genomic sequencing of BAC clones. Theor. Appl. Genet.
Anderson, W.W., J. Arnold, D.G. Baldwin, A.T. Beckenbach, C.J. Brown, S.H. Bryant, J.A. Coyne, L.G. Harshman & W.B. Heed, 1991. Four decades of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 10367–10371.
Barton, N.H. & P.D. Keightley, 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 11–21.
Baum, M., S. Grando, G. Backes, A. Jahoor, A. Sabbagh & S. Ceccarelli, 2003. QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross ‘Arta’ × H. spontaneum 41-1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1215–1225.
Bres-Patry, C., M. Lorieux, G. Clement, M. Bangratz & A. Ghesquiere, 2001. Heredity and genetic mapping of domestication-related traits in a temperate japonica weedy rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 118–126.
Burke, J.M., S. Tang, S.J. Knapp & L.H. Rieseberg, 2002. Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication. Genetics 161: 1257–1267.
Cai, H.W. & H. Morishima, 2002. QTL clusters reflect character associations in wild and cultivated rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1217–1228.
Cowie, R.H. & J.S. Jones, 1998. Gene frequency changes in Cepaea snails on the Marlborough Downs over 25 years. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 233–255.
Darwin, C., 1899. The Origin of Species. H.M. Caldwell Co., New York, NY., USA.
Doebley, J., A. Stec & L. Hubbard, 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485–488.
Doebley, J., A. Stec, J. Wendel & M. Edwards, 1990. Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F-2 population implications for the origin of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9888–9892.
Doganlar, S., A. Frary, M.C. Daunay, R.N. Lester & S.D. Tanksley, 2002. Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161: 1713–1726.
Dudley, J.W. and R.J. Lambert, 1992. Ninety generations of selection for oil and protein in maize. Maydica 37:1–7
Eyre-Walker, A., R.L. Gaut, H. Hilton, D.L. Feldman & B.S. Gaut, 1998. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 4441–4446.
Frary, A. & S. Doganlar, 2003. Comparative genetics of crop plant domestication and evolution. Turkish J. Agr. For. 27: 59–69.
Frary, A., S. Doganlar, M.C. Daunay & S.D. Tanksley, 2003. QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant and implications for conservation of gene function during evolution of solanaceous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 359–370.
Frary, A., T.C. Nesbitt, A. Frary, S. Grandillo, E. van der Knaap, B. Cong, J. Liu, J. Meller, R. Elber, K.B. Alpert & S.D. Tanksley, 2000. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85–88.
Fu, H., Z. Zheng & H.K. Dooner, 2001. Recombination rates between adjacent genic and retrotransposon regions in maize vary by 2 orders of magnitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 1082–1087.
Fulton, T.M., B.T. Beck, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed, J. Lopez, V. Petiard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir & S.D. Tanksley, 1997. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 881–894.
Gill, K.S., B.S. Gill, T.R. Endo & E.V. Boyko, 1996. Identification and high-density mapping of gene-rich regions in chromosome group 5 of wheat. Genetics 143: 1001–1012.
Gottlieb, L.D., 1984. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am. Nat. 123: 681–709.
Grant, P.R. & B.R. Grant, 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296: 707–711.
Grant, V., 1981. Plant Speciation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY., USA.
Harlan, J.R., 1992. Crops and Man. American Society of Agronomy: Crop Science Society of America, Madison WI, USA.
Hashizume, T., I. Shimamoto & M. Hirai, 2003. Construction of a linkage map and QTL analysis of horticultural traits for watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mastsum and Nakai] using RAPD, RFLP and ISSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 779–785.
Hillman, G.C. & M.S. Davies, 1990. Domestication rates in wild-type wheats and barley under primitive cultivation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39: 39–78.
Hilu, K.W., 1983. The role of single-gene mutations in the evolution of flowering plants. Evol. Biol. 16: 97–128.
Huang, X.Q., H. Coester, M.W. Ganal & M.S. Roeder, 2003. Advanced backcross QTL analysis for the identification of quantitative trait loci alleles from wild relatives of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 1379–1389.
Johnson, W.C., L.E. Jackson, O. Ochoa, R. van Wijk, J. Peleman, D.A. St. Clair & R.W. Michelmore, 2000. Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and Lactuca serriola, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 1066–1073.
Koinange, E.M.K., S.P. Singh & P. Gepts, 1996. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci. 36: 1037–1045.
Ladizinsky, G., 1985. Founder effect in crop-plant evolution. Econ. Bot. 39: 191–199.
Lande, R., 1983. The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity 50: 47–65.
Le Thierry D’Ennequin, M., B. Toupance, T. Robert, B. Godelle & P.H. Gouyon, 1999. Plant domestication: a model for studying the selection of linkage. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1138–1147.
Lenormand, T. & S.P. Otto, 2000. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156: 423–428.
Lester, R.N., 1989. Evolution under domestication involving disturbance of genic balance. Euphytica 44: 125–132.
Mauricio, R., 2001. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: uses and caveats for evolutionary biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 370–381.
Orr, H.A., 1998a. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935–949.
Orr, H. A., 1998b. Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics 149: 2099–2104.
Orr, H.A., 2003. The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. Genetics 163: 1519–1526.
Orr, H.A. & A.J. Betancourt, 2001. Haldane’s sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157: 875–884.
Orr, H.A. & J.A. Coyne, 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am. Nat. 140: 725–742.
Otto, S.P. & N.H. Barton, 1997. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics 147: 879–906.
Otto, S.P. & N.H. Barton, 2001. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55: 1921–1931.
Paterson, A.H., 2002. What has QTL mapping taught us about plant domestication? New Phytol. 154: 591–08.
Paterson, A.H., S. Damon, J.D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H.D. Rabinowitch, S.E. Lincoln, E.S. Lander & S.D. Tanksley, 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato — comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181–197.
Paterson, A.H., Y.R. Lin, Z. Li, K.F. Schertz, J.F. Doebley, S.R.M. Pinson, S.C. Liu, J.W. Stansel & J.E. Irvine, 1995. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269: 1714–1718.
Peng, J., Y. Ronin, T. Fahima, M.S. Roder, Y. Li, E. Nevo & A. Korol, 2003. Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2489–2494.
Pernes, J., 1983. The genetics of the domestication of cereals. Recherche 14: 910–919.
Pillen, K., A. Zacharias & J. Léon, 2004. Comparative AB-QTL analysis in barley using a single exotic donor of Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1591–1601.
Poncet, V., F. Lamy, K.M. Devos, M.D. Gale, A. Sarr & T. Robert, 2000. Genetic control of domestication traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 147–159.
Poncet, V., F. Lamy, J. Enjalbert, H. Joly, A. Sarr & T. Robert, 1998. Genetic analysis of the domestication syndrome in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae): Inheritance of the major characters. Heredity 81: 648–58.
Rao, G.U., C.A. Ben, Y. Borovsky & I. Paran, 2003. Mapping of yield-related QTLs in pepper in an interspecific cross of Capsicum annuum and C. frutescens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 1457–1466.
Rieseberg, L.H., A. Widmer, A.M. Arntz & J.M. Burke, 2002. Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 12242–12245.
Ross-Ibarra, J., 2004. The evolution of recombination under domestication: a test of two hypotheses. Am. Nat. 163: 105–112.
Takeuchi, Y., S.Y. Lin, T. Sasaki & M. Yano, 2003. Fine linkage mapping enables dissection of closely linked quantitative trait loci for seed dormancy and heading in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1174–1180.
Thomson, M.J., T.H. Tai, A.M. McClung, X-H. Lai, M.E. Hinga, K.B. Lobos, Y. Xu, C.P. Martinez & S.R. McCouch, 2003. Mapping quantitative trait loci for yield, yield components and morphological traits in an advanced backcross population between Oryza rufipogon and the Oryza sativa cultivar Jefferson. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 479–493.
Varona, L., L. Gomez-Raya, W.M. Rauw, A. Clop, C. Ovilo & J.L. Noguera, 2004. Derivation of a Bayes factor to distinguish between linked or pleiotropic quantitative trait loci. Genetics 166: 1025–1035.
Vavilov, N., 1922. The law of homologous series in variation. J. Genet. 12: 47–89.
Visser, M.E., A.J. van Noordwijk, J.M. Tinbergen & C.M. Lessells, 1998. Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 265: 1867–1870.
Wang, R.L., A. Stec, J. Hey, L. Lukens & J. Doebley, 1999. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236–239.
Wang, D., G.L. Graef, A.M. Procopiuk, & B.W. Diers, 2004. Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 458–467.
Ware, D & L. Stein, 2003. Comparison of genes among cereals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6: 121–127.
Westerbergh, A. & J. Doebley, 2002. Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution 56: 273–283.
Xiao, J.H., J.M. Li, S. Grandillo, S.N. Ahn, L.P. Yuan, S.D. Tanksley & S.R. McCouch, 1998. Identification of trait-improving quantitative trait loci alleles from a wild rice relative, Oryza rufipogon. Genetics 150: 899–909.
Xiong, L.X., K.D. Liu, X.K. Dai, C.G. Xu & Q.F. Zhang, 1999. Identification of genetic factors controlling domestication-related traits of rice using an F-2 population of a cross between Oryza sativa and O. rufipogon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 243–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ross-Ibarra, J. (2005). Quantitative trait loci and the study of plant domestication. In: Mauricio, R. (eds) Genetics of Adaptation. Georgia Genetics Review III, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3836-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3836-4_18
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3476-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3836-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)